Nope. I'm asking you to elaborate because your statement made no damn sense.
It made no sense to you because you didn't read the comments before it. IF you did and still don't understand more words aren't going to help. Goldfish don't just struggle with physics because they haven't heard enough about it.
This post was edited 4 minutes after it was posted.
There is plenty of self deception going on by Trumpers.
But perhaps the largest is the belief that a Trump 2nd term will usher in global peace. A regular paradisiac new world order where everyone throws down their weapons and beats their swords into plowshares.
A Trump 2nd term will result in unprecedented global instability as he abandons allies and democracies in favor of despotic dictators that flatter him with love letters and give his family billions in "investments". Gone will be the international trust in working with the US and our intelligence agencies.
But don't take my word for it. Ask the life long Republicans that served in his cabinet and say he is entirely unfit and would be a disaster. That have spent their lives dealing with national security. Are these guys wrong and Steve Bannon, Charlie Kirk, Sean Hannity are right?
Classic leftist delusion and projection.
Biden is literally carrying water for Hamas because he knows it will help him win Michigan.
Neocons like John Bolton who think we need to invade every country on earth and stay forever to make themselves rich are the ones who were unfit for office.
Literal evidence of a low intellect and a poor education. And Google won't save you.
And your character is "literally" worse than your intellect and education !
The former president's campaign said the video featuring hypothetical newspaper headlines was "reposted by a staffer" to his Truth Social account while Trump was in court on Monday.
Winny, anyone who wants to live a 70s lifestyle of no flying, no cable, no cell phone, no computer, no eating out, no $50,000 truck, living in a small home…they can do that on a pretty low salary. Still doable, no problem. feel free!
Baffling that you think this is a good response.
WTF does any of that have to do with economics?
your view is that talking about economics really isn't economics.
Biden is literally carrying water for Hamas because he knows it will help him win Michigan.
Neocons like John Bolton who think we need to invade every country on earth and stay forever to make themselves rich are the ones who were unfit for office.
Literal evidence of a low intellect and a poor education. And Google won't save you.
And your character is "literally" worse than your intellect and education !
Here is the compilation of some of the most controversial remarks made by 2020 Democratic Presidential nominee and former Vice President Joe Biden over the y...
Philly grabs 6% of your paycheck after state and federal taxes. Combined with inflation, anemic wage growth, and his past history of tax cuts, this makes sense.
Is he going to win Philly? Hell no! But Clinton strategies James Carville described Pennsylvania best:
If Trump wins Pennsylvania or Michigan, it's game over. He's the betting favorite right now, which isn't too significant with all the time remaining. But in two weeks we'll have a verdict, Biden is practically a lame duck and has such an uphill battle that I want to ask a too-early question:
If you support Biden and Trump wins, do you think the Democratic party will do any soul searching and look at how things played out? Or, will we go straight to attacking Trump for everything he does without collecting $200?
If by soul searching you mean 'adopt fascist no-nothing cruel and stupid and pathologically lying Republican campaigning styles and policies' then no.
Honestly, the way the Dems are going, if Biden loses, the far lefties in the party will feel vindicated, a little happy, and push a Bernie type to the front of the party. Which would be a very very losing strategy. But the Dems are very terrible at the politics so that's what they would do.
This thread is rapidly devolving into a tit-for-tat s-show, so thank you for your earnest response. You're no fan of Trump, nor do you need to be to answer the question.
I find it intriguing that you see progressives doubling down in 2028. They may not have that option, though. Remember, Bernie was on track to win the nomination in both 2016 and 2020, until the party stepped in.
There's another irony I see here, and I can't help but point out: the GOP used to be the "big tent party," where all you had to do was ape Michael J Fox's character from "Family Ties" to belong. Now it looks like the Democratic party is in that role; you've got everyone from your young radicals to your retirees united in their hatred of Trump.
Raises an obvious question: what will become of the Democratic party once Trump is gone? (And, for the purposes of the thought experiment, remember that the 2020 election outcome didn't really matter in terms of making him irrelevant, so I doubt an L in 2024 changes much.)
If by soul searching you mean 'adopt fascist no-nothing cruel and stupid and pathologically lying Republican campaigning styles and policies' then no.
Honestly, the way the Dems are going, if Biden loses, the far lefties in the party will feel vindicated, a little happy, and push a Bernie type to the front of the party. Which would be a very very losing strategy. But the Dems are very terrible at the politics so that's what they would do.
This thread is rapidly devolving into a tit-for-tat s-show, so thank you for your earnest response. You're no fan of Trump, nor do you need to be to answer the question.
I find it intriguing that you see progressives doubling down in 2028. They may not have that option, though. Remember, Bernie was on track to win the nomination in both 2016 and 2020, until the party stepped in.
There's another irony I see here, and I can't help but point out: the GOP used to be the "big tent party," where all you had to do was ape Michael J Fox's character from "Family Ties" to belong. Now it looks like the Democratic party is in that role; you've got everyone from your young radicals to your retirees united in their hatred of Trump.
Raises an obvious question: what will become of the Democratic party once Trump is gone? (And, for the purposes of the thought experiment, remember that the 2020 election outcome didn't really matter in terms of making him irrelevant, so I doubt an L in 2024 changes much.)
I might respond more seriously later but it’s a myth that Bernie was winning until the party put its finger on the scale. millions more Dems favor a moderate like Obama, HRC and Joe over socialist Bernie. Millions. And that’s how they voted in the primary: for HRC.
This post was edited 25 seconds after it was posted.
This thread is rapidly devolving into a tit-for-tat s-show, so thank you for your earnest response. You're no fan of Trump, nor do you need to be to answer the question.
I find it intriguing that you see progressives doubling down in 2028. They may not have that option, though. Remember, Bernie was on track to win the nomination in both 2016 and 2020, until the party stepped in.
There's another irony I see here, and I can't help but point out: the GOP used to be the "big tent party," where all you had to do was ape Michael J Fox's character from "Family Ties" to belong. Now it looks like the Democratic party is in that role; you've got everyone from your young radicals to your retirees united in their hatred of Trump.
Raises an obvious question: what will become of the Democratic party once Trump is gone? (And, for the purposes of the thought experiment, remember that the 2020 election outcome didn't really matter in terms of making him irrelevant, so I doubt an L in 2024 changes much.)
I might respond more seriously later but it’s a myth that Bernie was winning until the party put its finger on the scale. millions more Dems favor a moderate like Obama, HRC and Joe over socialist Bernie. Millions. And that’s how they voted in the primary: for HRC.
Except wikileaks released the emails and internal DNC memos which showed that's exactly what the party did....
This thread is rapidly devolving into a tit-for-tat s-show, so thank you for your earnest response. You're no fan of Trump, nor do you need to be to answer the question.
I find it intriguing that you see progressives doubling down in 2028. They may not have that option, though. Remember, Bernie was on track to win the nomination in both 2016 and 2020, until the party stepped in.
There's another irony I see here, and I can't help but point out: the GOP used to be the "big tent party," where all you had to do was ape Michael J Fox's character from "Family Ties" to belong. Now it looks like the Democratic party is in that role; you've got everyone from your young radicals to your retirees united in their hatred of Trump.
Raises an obvious question: what will become of the Democratic party once Trump is gone? (And, for the purposes of the thought experiment, remember that the 2020 election outcome didn't really matter in terms of making him irrelevant, so I doubt an L in 2024 changes much.)
I might respond more seriously later but it’s a myth that Bernie was winning until the party put its finger on the scale. millions more Dems favor a moderate like Obama, HRC and Joe over socialist Bernie. Millions. And that’s how they voted in the primary: for HRC.
Both of my parents voted Hillary then Biden over Bernie. Everyone my age voted for Warren or Bernie
The "unified reich" comment in a video on Truth Social was a reference to a World War I headline and had nothing to do with Hitler's third reich as that did not yet exist. A junior staffer did not notice the reference and posted it.
If by soul searching you mean 'adopt fascist no-nothing cruel and stupid and pathologically lying Republican campaigning styles and policies' then no.
Honestly, the way the Dems are going, if Biden loses, the far lefties in the party will feel vindicated, a little happy, and push a Bernie type to the front of the party. Which would be a very very losing strategy. But the Dems are very terrible at the politics so that's what they would do.
This thread is rapidly devolving into a tit-for-tat s-show, so thank you for your earnest response. You're no fan of Trump, nor do you need to be to answer the question.
I find it intriguing that you see progressives doubling down in 2028. They may not have that option, though. Remember, Bernie was on track to win the nomination in both 2016 and 2020, until the party stepped in.
There's another irony I see here, and I can't help but point out: the GOP used to be the "big tent party," where all you had to do was ape Michael J Fox's character from "Family Ties" to belong. Now it looks like the Democratic party is in that role; you've got everyone from your young radicals to your retirees united in their hatred of Trump.
Raises an obvious question: what will become of the Democratic party once Trump is gone? (And, for the purposes of the thought experiment, remember that the 2020 election outcome didn't really matter in terms of making him irrelevant, so I doubt an L in 2024 changes much.)
What will become of the D party depends on what becomes of the R party when Trump is gone. If the Rs weaken significantly the Ds will keep doing what they are doing now with some rumblings here and there from "young radicals". If the Rs continue on this runaway train out to destroy democracy the Ds will have to lower their standard as well to compete in an unethical manner.
