Official LRC President Joseph R Biden Thread

WinstonSmith wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

You should consider lying because really no one respects you

And let's remember who you are.

If I was a Columbia Grad who went to Harvard Law and had a medal of honor and a nobel prize you'd still attack my record because I'm not in your demented little cult.

WinstonSmith wrote:

gramps wrote:

I never said history isn't real. I said reading about it isn't the same thing as being there. That's not ground shaking information. Most people understand that.

1. It is completely laughable to pretend that you know more about anything just because you were alive at the time.

2. I was an adult when Clinton was president anyway so your argument is defeated by default.

3. You're a painfully stupid person. There is no topic on which I would take your opinion over anyone else alive. If you witnessed something with your dog I would honestly rather get your dog's take on what happened than yours.

WinstonSmith wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

You should consider lying because really no one respects you

And let's remember who you are.

If I was a Columbia Grad who went to Harvard Law and had a medal of honor and a nobel prize you'd still attack my record because I'm not in your demented little cult.

WinstonSmith wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

You should consider lying because really no one respects you

And let's remember who you are.

If I was a Columbia Grad who went to Harvard Law and had a medal of honor and a nobel prize you'd still attack my record because I'm not in your demented little cult.

Trollminator wrote:

WinstonSmith wrote:

1. It is completely laughable to pretend that you know more about anything just because you were alive at the time.

2. I was an adult when Clinton was president anyway so your argument is defeated by default.

3. You're a painfully stupid person. There is no topic on which I would take your opinion over anyone else alive. If you witnessed something with your dog I would honestly rather get your dog's take on what happened than yours.

Based on your posting history, you must believe you know everything, and better than anyone else. What leads me to conclude this? You try to argue everything to death, and I've never seen you acknowledge anything someone else posts as being correct or insightful. Keep up the great work!

gramps wrote:

No you weren't an adult when Clinton was president. Why do I know that, because you lack knowledge of the tenor of time. You make claims about that period and peoples views that are just untrue. Your takes lack nuance. You're projecting todays political polarization onto the general population back then. The general population back then wasn't nearly as dug in as they are now. You act as if there was rabid support for Clinton, after his sex scandal, there wasn't.

You only regurgitate things you've read. As I said before, it's not the same as being there.

WinstonSmith wrote:

Nnonequals wrote:

Please don't blame your parents' profound disappointment in you on me. It's not nice.

Come on now. Every one knows all of you stolen valor cowards lie about being war heroes to compensate for your daddy didn't love me issues.

You're projecting again! Poor little war hero.

hunter wheres the blow wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

Based on your posting history, you must believe you know everything, and better than anyone else. What leads me to conclude this? You try to argue everything to death, and I've never seen you acknowledge anything someone else posts as being correct or insightful. Keep up the great work!

Adult has studied his talking points very well. If you say something about taxes, he has a taxes response. If you say something about the 2008 financial crisis, he has a 2008 financial crisis response. These responses are very often repeated as the same topics come up. It's very politician-y. He kinda reminds me of Destiny the twitch debate pundit guy. Self taught based on years of experience. If he knew any underlying explanations or theory, he'd explain himself more, but he doesn't do that so you know he's really only memorized the talking points.

hunter wheres the blow wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

Based on your posting history, you must believe you know everything, and better than anyone else. What leads me to conclude this? You try to argue everything to death, and I've never seen you acknowledge anything someone else posts as being correct or insightful. Keep up the great work!

Adult has studied his talking points very well. If you say something about taxes, he has a taxes response. If you say something about the 2008 financial crisis, he has a 2008 financial crisis response. These responses are very often repeated as the same topics come up. It's very politician-y. He kinda reminds me of Destiny the twitch debate pundit guy. Self taught based on years of experience. If he knew any underlying explanations or theory, he'd explain himself more, but he doesn't do that so you know he's really only memorized the talking points.

agip wrote:

this quien es mas macho battle is interesting to only two people.

would you all take it elsewhere or just walk away, por favor?

WinstonSmith wrote:

gramps wrote:

Good god man. Give it rest. - 92 was a landslide ( Bush - read my lips no new taxes) , 96 was an even bigger landslide (Newt's government shutdown)

You quickly read the wrong article for your talking point.

Clinton got 43% of the vote in 92 you idiot. You preach about being there for 2 hours and then demonstrate you have no f*cking idea what actually happened.

LOL!

You are the dumbest person I've ever seen on these boards and that is really saying something.

WinstonSmith wrote:

agip wrote:

this quien es mas macho battle is interesting to only two people.

would you all take it elsewhere or just walk away, por favor?

Like it's any less interesting than your usual baghdad agip routine which clogs the thread.

Don't worry whenever the next logical step is for nonequals to just admit he's lying he disappears for the day.

WinstonSmith wrote:

hunter wheres the blow wrote:

Adult has studied his talking points very well. If you say something about taxes, he has a taxes response. If you say something about the 2008 financial crisis, he has a 2008 financial crisis response. These responses are very often repeated as the same topics come up. It's very politician-y. He kinda reminds me of Destiny the twitch debate pundit guy. Self taught based on years of experience. If he knew any underlying explanations or theory, he'd explain himself more, but he doesn't do that so you know he's really only memorized the talking points.

If I ask you about your favorite football team's QB will your answer be a "talking point" or your opinion on the subject?

I don't explain myself more because if any of the cult members don't like any of your opinions they immediately launch into personal attacks.

gramps wrote:

WinstonSmith wrote:

Clinton got 43% of the vote in 92 you idiot. You preach about being there for 2 hours and then demonstrate you have no f*cking idea what actually happened.

LOL!

You are the dumbest person I've ever seen on these boards and that is really saying something.

The electoral vote was 370 -168 a landslide. In 96 it was 379-159 a bigger landslide.

Are you saying the popular vote matters. Because, your guy Trump lost the popular vote in 2016 and again 2020.

It's like you don't understand how anything works.

agip wrote:

WinstonSmith wrote:

Like it's any less interesting than your usual baghdad agip routine which clogs the thread.

Don't worry whenever the next logical step is for nonequals to just admit he's lying he disappears for the day.

the truth shall set you free. or not, since you are a lying piece of anti-democracy, anti-honor, anti-law, anti-Constitution mierde.