The only dildos here are the brojos
The only dildos here are the brojos
star fish wrote:
pathfinder wrote:
Including you guys.
I guess people see what they want to see.
The guy is literally pointing to the dildo shaped object with his smartphone, having called his lover on it. What do you think he wants us to see?
The name on the phone. But, as I said, people, including the Brojos and you, see what they want to see.
The fact people can argue this is anything other than dildo shows you just how blinkered people can be.
I hope one day, you all catch me in bed with your wife and I’ll tell you I’m her gay best friend and we were just naked cuddling in your bed.
You’ll shake my hand and grab me a beer.
star fish wrote:
The guy is literally pointing to the dildo shaped object with his smartphone, having called his lover on it. What do you think he wants us to see?
I guess you are now accusing him of having an affair with his mother, Naomi...and she is in on using a doll's leg as a dildo.
For the record you dildos, David Rudisha is the son of former 4 x 400m silver medallist Daniel, and 400m hurdler Naomi
Starfish is clearly an idiot, but you guys claiming it's a doll's leg are even worse. Even if it is a doll's leg or 'pink umbella' he would clearly know it looks like a dildo. He is posing in front of it.
Naomi is a common female name. However, maybe in the light of his wife's recent public social media criticism of his lack of attention, he is replying by saying he is not her personal dildo and family comes first?
Coevett wrote:
Starfish is clearly an idiot, but you guys claiming it's a doll's leg are even worse. Even if it is a doll's leg or 'pink umbella' he would clearly know it looks like a dildo. He is posing in front of it.
Naomi is a common female name. However, maybe in the light of his wife's recent public social media criticism of his lack of attention, he is replying by saying he is not her personal dildo and family comes first?
FMD, and you reckon Starfish is an idiot?
Coevett wrote:
Starfish is clearly an idiot, but you guys claiming it's a doll's leg are even worse. Even if it is a doll's leg or 'pink umbella' he would clearly know it looks like a dildo. He is posing in front of it.
Naomi is a common female name. However, maybe in the light of his wife's recent public social media criticism of his lack of attention, he is replying by saying he is not her personal dildo and family comes first?
It's a dolls leg you friggin' idiot, with a white sock/shoe on:
https://imgur.com/a/d5ofkhwCoevett wrote:
Starfish is clearly an idiot, but you guys claiming it's a doll's leg are even worse. Even if it is a doll's leg or 'pink umbella' he would clearly know it looks like a dildo. He is posing in front of it.
Naomi is a common female name. However, maybe in the light of his wife's recent public social media criticism of his lack of attention, he is replying by saying he is not her personal dildo and family comes first?
It appears as if Coevett is LetsRun’s resident dildo expert. This explains a lot. Coevett is perpetually threatened by black males, as he feels that he can only measure up with a dildo. Consequently he constantly belittles them and accuses them of doping.
Pervy Pervison wrote:
Looks like a small umbrella to me. ?
Too small to be a dildo and it’s not black.
That's a sex toy.
rare wrote:
jiaaf wrote:
You guys have reached a new low as any attacks on Africans appear to be permitted but nobody can question whether the white men, such as Woody Kincaid, could be doping. Some of you are clearly racist.
Hi El K, how are you?
What a idiot, I wish El K would go away for good. Nobody here ever suspected white runners including Radcliffe and Rupp....
....................................................... wrote:
Anyone has a hunch of what model it is? Asking for a "friend" . . . .
Could it be the highly popular "rabbit" known as a woman's best friend?
East Coast poor wrote:
rare wrote:
Hi El K, how are you?
What a idiot, I wish El K would go away for good. Nobody here ever suspected white runners including Radcliffe and Rupp....
YOU are the true moron here. Jiaaf is not El K. That I can guarantee you.
Rudisha posing in front of a single doll's leg (on an otherwise empty shelf and with the other shelves full of clutter) would be 100 x weirder than it being a dildo. Come to think of it, seeing a broken doll's leg with a white sock is 100 x creepier than seeing a dildo, but it fits in with the psychopathology of a lot of the doping apologists here.
It's a dolls leg you friggin' idiot. wrote:
Coevett wrote:
Starfish is clearly an idiot, but you guys claiming it's a doll's leg are even worse. Even if it is a doll's leg or 'pink umbella' he would clearly know it looks like a dildo. He is posing in front of it.
Naomi is a common female name. However, maybe in the light of his wife's recent public social media criticism of his lack of attention, he is replying by saying he is not her personal dildo and family comes first?
It's a dolls leg you friggin' idiot, with a white sock/shoe on:
https://imgur.com/a/d5ofkhw
What do you use to get high before coming on here to post on the weekend?
Drunk Letsrun wrote:
What do you use to get high before coming on here to post on the weekend?
+1
I know lots of people who collect doll's legs. I have over 100 in my collection. Not always with socks, or even white socks. Sometimes black, sometimes pink - sometimes knee length.
What kind of person is Coevett who thinks there is something strange in keeping doll's legs as ornaments?
It's "dildoe" FYI.
I have phd in doll science, so I can confirm it is indeed a doll leg, not a dildo. Although a doll leg can be used as a dildo. So in that sense it is a dildo. A doll leg dildo.
Coevett wrote:
Rudisha posing in front of a single doll's leg (on an otherwise empty shelf and with the other shelves full of clutter) would be 100 x weirder than it being a dildo.
Come to think of it, seeing a broken doll's leg with a white sock is 100 x creepier than seeing a dildo, but it fits in with the psychopathology of a lot of the doping apologists here.
It's a dolls leg you friggin' idiot. wrote:
It's a dolls leg you friggin' idiot, with a white sock/shoe on:
https://imgur.com/a/d5ofkhw
Yep of course. Rudisha uploads a photo to Instagram inside his own house with either a doll's leg or a dildo (both legal objects for an adult to own) in the background and so therefore he is doping...
It's probably a doll's leg anyway as he has a young daughter, that looks like the living room, and there are other children's toys on the shelf
ex-runner wrote:
Yep of course. Rudisha uploads a photo to Instagram inside his own house with either a doll's leg or a dildo (both legal objects for an adult to own) in the background and so therefore he is doping...
It's probably a doll's leg anyway as he has a young daughter, that looks like the living room, and there are other children's toys on the shelf
I don't think one person has said anything about doping in this thread until you.
Having said that, you and the rest of the doping apologist freaks here would probably feel less need to make excuses if the 'doll's leg' resembled a syringe with EPO maked on it, rather than a dildo.
ex-runner and co : 'David Rudisha is a Kenyan, and therefore so simple he wouldn't be able to notice an object strongly resembling a dildo in the background right over his head in an Instagram post. It's amazing he can even use Instagram because they don't even have the Internet in Kenya'. Anyway, Rudisha posing with a dildo on Instagram would only prove that Seb Coe and every white runner in history was juiced to the gills. Brojos when are you going to ban the racist Coevett?'
Coevett and co : 'David Rudisha is a highly intelligent social media savvy experience athlete and is deliberately posing in front of a dildo shaped object in another strange post no doubt as a retort to the social media criticism and shaming of him by his wife.'
Coevett wrote:
ex-runner wrote:
Yep of course. Rudisha uploads a photo to Instagram inside his own house with either a doll's leg or a dildo (both legal objects for an adult to own) in the background and so therefore he is doping...
It's probably a doll's leg anyway as he has a young daughter, that looks like the living room, and there are other children's toys on the shelf
I don't think one person has said anything about doping in this thread until you.
Having said that, you and the rest of the doping apologist freaks here would probably feel less need to make excuses if the 'doll's leg' resembled a syringe with EPO maked on it, rather than a dildo.
ex-runner and co : 'David Rudisha is a Kenyan, and therefore so simple he wouldn't be able to notice an object strongly resembling a dildo in the background right over his head in an Instagram post. It's amazing he can even use Instagram because they don't even have the Internet in Kenya'. Anyway, Rudisha posing with a dildo on Instagram would only prove that Seb Coe and every white runner in history was juiced to the gills. Brojos when are you going to ban the racist Coevett?'
Coevett and co : 'David Rudisha is a highly intelligent social media savvy experience athlete and is deliberately posing in front of a dildo shaped object in another strange post no doubt as a retort to the social media criticism and shaming of him by his wife.'
Actually, you mentioned doping first. On page 4 you wrote:
Coevett wrote:
Come to think of it, seeing a broken doll's leg with a white sock is 100 x creepier than seeing a dildo, but it fits in with the psychopathology of a lot of the doping apologists here.
Anyway, it's not strange if someone mistakes that doll leg for a dildo at first, but people like Subway and Coevett insisting that it is a dildo and that David is sending some subliminal message by including it in a picture is something only a troll or a mentally disturbed person would do. Especially after a good number of posters told these people what that object is.
And Weldon, this thread is embarrassing.
It shouldn't have gone beyond the first page. It should have been deleted a long time ago.