Pictures are worth a thousand words wrote:
On Sept 15th 2018 the woman saw a picture of Robert Mueller? Has she been living in a cave?
Not everyone follows MSM 24/7 like LRC basementers.
Mueller's name rec is well under 33%, probably under 20%.
Pictures are worth a thousand words wrote:
On Sept 15th 2018 the woman saw a picture of Robert Mueller? Has she been living in a cave?
Not everyone follows MSM 24/7 like LRC basementers.
Mueller's name rec is well under 33%, probably under 20%.
Another non-news watcher wrote:
The accuser's name is Carolyne Cass of Cass Fashion.
Fearing for her life, she took a plane out of DC before the news conference revealed her name.
Carolyne Alicia Cass LLC is a New York Domestic Limited-Liability Company filed on October 16, 2008 . The company's filing status is listed as Active and its File Number is 3732506 . The Registered Agent on file for this company is Carolyne Cass and is located at 237 Sullivan Street Apt 3d, New York, NY 10012.
https://www.bizapedia.com/ny/carolyne-alicia-cass-llc.htmlTime to plea bargain wrote:
Explain to me again the actual FBI press release (NYC office) detailing Mueller's visit (2010), or do such actual facts just not exist in your world because they are too inconvenient? So why is this exact press release (distributed at press conference) not available online Internet, when the search mechanism goes back to 2010?
How about you explain the press release to me. How does a press release saying Mueller was in NYC in 2010 at some point prove that he was there "on or around" the day in question and rapes someone? The search mechanism you reference doesn't pull anything for the years 2010, 2011 or 2012. Data storage issue or three-year-long cover-up of FBI activities??? THE PLOT THICKENS.
The fact that Mueller was in DC on August 2nd doesn't bother you at all? The fact that she says it occurred in his suite on the 19th floor, when the 19th floor is an athletic club doesn't concern you at all? The fact that this woman didn't show up and Wohl and Burkman couldn't agree on how her name was spelled doesn't concern you? The fact that she might not exist doesn't concern you? The fact that Wohl was banned from securities trading due to fraud and misleading investors doesn't concern you? The fact that Burkman has, while working on other unrelated conspiracy theories, claimed to have credible witnesses who also never materialized doesn't concern you? The fact that the Gateway Pundit pulled Wohl's documents after putting them up and suspended their relationship with him doesn't concern you? The fact that documents contain no mention of Mueller's FBI security detail (which he would have had at the time) doesn't concern you? The fact that Wohl lied about his connections to his "intelligence firm" until he was outed and used stolen model headshots for the LinkedIn profiles of his "employees" doesn't concern you? The fact that this woman chose to reach out to Jacob Wohl's fake company (rather than, say, a real law firm) before it even existed doesn't concern you?
Wohl says no quid pro quo was offered. Unfortunately, another woman has email evidence that she was offered monetary compensation to make accusations against Mueller by Surefire Intelligence. This doesn't concern you? Do you also believe Jacob Wohl has surpassed the genius of Mozart?
You refuse trust anything the mainstream media or the FBI says, but you'll accept the absurd claims of a 20-year-old, disgraced sociopath at face value. How humiliating.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ny-pol-trump-wohl-women-cash-mueller-assault-20181101-story.htmlBad Wigins wrote:
Mueller's name rec is well under 33%, probably under 20%.
Exactly. Even during Kava-brawl in Congress, only something like 10% of USA people could name even a single SCOTUS supreme court justice. Unless you follow MSM 24/7 soap-opera as if it were a Netflix production, you'd not recon the guy.
The fact that Mueller was in DC on August 2nd doesn't bother you at all?
Planes to NYC exist. Trains to NYC exist.
For that matter: FBI travel accounts exist. Conference records exist.
The date will be worked out. The worksheet even says "on or about", why the insistence upon its ineffable correctitude?
When you make a mountain out of a minor molehill, what does that say about the other facts that are being demonstratively ignored?
The fact that she says it occurred in his suite on the 19th floor, when the 19th floor is an athletic club doesn't concern you at all?
The St Regis was renovated in 2013. Oh, MSM didn't report that fact?
Blue-check verified wrote:
Self-described genius wrote:
Literally on social media
Heh.
@CassCarolyne
LA Fashionista. Well-renowned designer that has studied at some of the top fashion schools in the world. This is a parody account.
Pic seems clipped from here.
http://elle-magazine.tumblr.com/post/816510300/street-chic-new-york-who-carolyne-cass-what-a..+.. wrote:
When you make a mountain out of a minor molehill, what does that say about the other facts that are being demonstratively ignored?
There are no other facts being ignored because you haven't presented any.
..+.. wrote:
The fact that Mueller was in DC on August 2nd doesn't bother you at all?
The date will be worked out. The worksheet even says "on or about", why the insistence upon its ineffable correctitude?
When you make a mountain out of a minor molehill, what does that say about the other facts that are being demonstratively ignored?
This is exactly how I know something big is in the works here. The irrelevant care to detail by MSM sycophants (even when codiciled "on or about"), when "protected" people like HRC are allowed to "change" their testimony (not even under oath!) however many billions of times to get their bit-bleached story right, while Mueller jails for "lying to FBI" and forcing pleajobs by going after the families of others.
Having seen him in action the last few years in Russian windmill lancing, can anyone doubt how a victim like Carolyne would have been silenced if she had come forward with the post-rape "DNA evidence" like was suggested?
odds-on wrote:
He is so confident of his power over her that he risks destroying an extremely successful career by unloading a wad of DNA. Not only is he evil; he's an idiot as well.
When you grow up and learn about real-world power structures, trying posting again.
Why do you think Harvey Weinstein was "an idiot" as well? He knew how the real power worked. No "DNA evidence" would make it past his "friends" (including Mossad on some occasions) or whoever he had going for him that day. If a Hollywood flunkie has such power to silence, imagine (just try, I know from our own experience you have no concept) how a 25yo woman when raped by head of FBI is going to act. Psychologically, there's NO CHANCE of recriminations. He knows it, she knows it. Until #MeToo started outing these rapists there was largely silence IN GENERAL, all the more so in this case where it was someone "you don't say know to" as Mueller was here.
Being assaulted by those in power is VERY threatening (cf. Juanita Broaddrick, among other WJC liaisons). Mocking the victims is totally uncalled for.
You're comparing Mueller to Weinstein? Take a look at their bios and look for similarities.
Everything Wohr has ever claimed is absolute BS, but the accuser he produces is believable? Again, the chances of her just happening to be a client of an imaginary company run by a right wing guy are zero. I really doubt a payment or report can be provided to prove she was ever a client.
Jack Burkman and Jacob Wohl are dumb and dumber. I miss the days when crackpots didn't have social media megaphones. History will remember this era as the internet dark ages.
..+.. wrote:
The fact that she says it occurred in his suite on the 19th floor, when the 19th floor is an athletic club doesn't concern you at all?
The St Regis was renovated in 2013. Oh, MSM didn't report that fact?
This is exactly like what they tried to do with the "Pumpkin Papers" with Whittaker Chambers (Witness), claiming that the Kodak film didn't exist when he claimed to have taken the pictures... OOPS, then a service-level technician recalled that they had a limited run of it that year, and was available to select distributors.
They concentrate on "facts" which SEEM to exist, and when the veil is dismissed, a heap of ruins remains.
crackpot media wrote:
Jack Burkman and Jacob Wohl are dumb and dumber. I miss the days when crackpots didn't have social media megaphones. History will remember this era as the internet dark ages.
What don't I understand is why they had the Media Event in DC.
You have to fly the victim Carolyne in, (she lives in NYC, sometimes LA).
Sure, Mueller is in DC, but the crime happened in NYC. That's where he'll be charged. Plus, it's his DS power base (in DC), bound to get etc the Soros-loonies showing up.
Bad move IMO, though I'm not a media-savvy like these guys.
Is-this-her ? wrote:
Another non-news watcher wrote:
The accuser's name is Carolyne Cass of Cass Fashion.
Fearing for her life, she took a plane out of DC before the news conference revealed her name.
Carolyne Alicia Cass LLC is a New York Domestic Limited-Liability Company filed on October 16, 2008 . The company's filing status is listed as Active and its File Number is 3732506 . The Registered Agent on file for this company is Carolyne Cass and is located at 237 Sullivan Street Apt 3d, New York, NY 10012.
https://www.bizapedia.com/ny/carolyne-alicia-cass-llc.html
This thread is useless with more pics. A LOT more pics. She is un-blonde in these pics. Your pic shows the dark roots under the fake hair coloring.
https://stylelikeu.com/profiles-2/closets/carolyne-cass/Friends of Bob wrote:
"I want to debunk this whole sad and tragic back story so we can get the focus back on our gal, our accuser and the main story. Lorraine Parsons, whom we allegedly paid (we didn't pay her), the problem is Lorraine Parsons doesn't exist (!). She's a phantom that somebody conjured," Burkman said. "There's a woman named Jennifer Taub, who does exist, but she received some email referencing in a vague way payment from a person who doesn't exist. That email also had nothing to do with us.
Considering that they fast made up this Lorraine Parsons woman and activated another friendly uni professor with imaginary email reference into the mix, you can see that Mueller knew this was coming and had Deepstate act en masse accordingly.
The real question is whether they will get to Cass's corroborating witness before she also is able to come forward.
Two of a Kind wrote:
crackpot media wrote:
Jack Burkman and Jacob Wohl are dumb and dumber. I miss the days when crackpots didn't have social media megaphones. History will remember this era as the internet dark ages.
What don't I understand is why they had the Media Event in DC.
You have to fly the victim Carolyne in, (she lives in NYC, sometimes LA).
Sure, Mueller is in DC, but the crime happened in NYC. That's where he'll be charged. Plus, it's his DS power base (in DC), bound to get etc the Soros-loonies showing up.
Bad move IMO, though I'm not a media-savvy like these guys.
They did fly her in, but she then feared for her life and flew straight back home again.
Look, you need to pick your battles here. Even the looniest of right wing loony websites are stepping slowly away from this train wreck.
j889a wrote:
This is actually just the first woman who will accuse Mueller from these genius representations.They will get more preposterous as time progresses, such as the who claims she went to multiple parties where FBI agents led by Mueller gang-raped her repeatedly.
Did Miss Cass (as they call her) continue to go to these fashionista meet-greets at upscale NYC boutiques even after her so-called run-in with a randy FBI cop?
Carolyne had the good fortune of growing up with a grandmother, mother and older sisters with flawless taste . . .
Don't you feel that it's a bit sexist that only WOMEN affected her taste?
Everyone is talking about the MSM, by why hasn't Fox run with it? Mueller being a rapist would make them die and go to heaven, but they've ignored the story.
trollism wrote:
Look, you need to pick your battles here. Even the looniest of right wing loony websites are stepping slowly away from this train wreck.
I'm sure half the posts (though not sure which half) in this thread are simply attempts to throw more weight on the train as it hurtles to its disaster.
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Everyone is talking about the MSM, by why hasn't Fox run with it? Mueller being a rapist would make them die and go to heaven, but they've ignored the story.
Much of Fox-News is (secretely) part of MSM, eg only hiring pseudo-conservative quislings.
If you actually watched them, you'd know they have a number of #NeverTrump elements, and aren't exactly opposed to Mueller.