43.70! Holy smokes!!
43.70! Holy smokes!!
Yawn wrote:
Try 44.09 -44.39 and see what you get, Brainstein.
an issue the rest of the posters in this thread weren't talking about there mrs. sharp as a marble.
HGL wrote:
How close was I!!!??? Thank you very much.
Decades as a NCAA DI coach and athlete lets me see talent, baby.
Great run from Kerley today and there's more in the tank.
Sir
Great Wishes
more nonsense wrote:
zxvxzcv wrote:I watched the finish four more times. That slowdown was absolutely worth .3 to .4 seconds.
In that case you're consistently clueless about the sport.
43.70.
zxvxzcv wrote:
more nonsense wrote:In that case you're consistently clueless about the sport.
43.70.
In a different race dilweed.
more nonsense wrote:
zxvxzcv wrote:43.70.
In a different race dilweed.
This^
Idiot posts are idiocy, lol.
more nonsense wrote:
Macdaddy wrote:I watched the finish four time and the slowdown was worth maybe .10-.15 seconds. It wasn't until the last few meters (the 42.7 mark) and, while he coasted in, he didn't 'put on the breaks' by any means.
At least you've got some common sense unlike the rest of the .40 secs better idiots.
Nice try to cover your ignorance with more insults. Was he going to go back and change his prelim time at SECs or to prove that was a 43.70 in his next hard race? Anyone who watched with an open mind could see that he cost himself multiple tenths slowing down, and thus that he was capable of going 43.70 when he did not let up. He might be close to Quincy Watts' pr of 43.50 at the NCAA finals and maybe gets to U.S. #3 behind Johnson and Reynolds at USATF.
more nonsense wrote:
zxvxzcv wrote:43.70.
In a different race dilweed.
zxvasdfasd wrote:
Nice try to cover your ignorance with more insults.
It was a statement of facts.
Seeing your complete humiliation is as satisfying as being absolutely spot on in my original assessment.
more nonsense wrote:
zxvasdfasd wrote:Nice try to cover your ignorance with more insults.
It was a statement of facts.