Anyone having issues with the live results page through Lancertiming? It's not updating for me...
Anyone having issues with the live results page through Lancertiming? It's not updating for me...
check the link on the lancer timing weather; the one posted on the forum previously didn't work
I am - I get the results page but nothing happens when I click the ""latest completed event" link.
http://lancertiming.com/results/winter16/IVYHEPS/index.htm
I had this problem with other meets from earlier this season that Lancertiming was providing results for.
Well, when I checked the multis this morning there were no heat sheets up--I'll know to check the individual events next time, I guess (or remember to refresh the page!).
Anyway, thanks for the coverage and projections. Taking a quick scan of men's events, I see that Malcolm Johnson was a DNS in the 60 after all. No Sisserson for Cornell in the PV--that's gotta hurt--and the Princeton guys had the two fastest times in the 60m heats.
Adam Kelly came up big (21m+) on his sixth throw in the WT, but Winkler still won by more than two feet.
Ahh, what am I doing? Just go to hepstrack.com for great coverage!
Anyway, zero points for Princeton in the 3,000. Could it be that they'll get skunked in the longer stuff? That would be a real blow for their team hopes.
Well Princeton could make up some ground in the other finals for tomorrow.
Cornell once again has the most # of qualifiers (19), while Princeton has 14. Penn has 10, which is a pleasant surprise. Columbia has 6, Brown & Dartmouth have 5, Harvard has 4, and Yale has 1.
For the multis, I saw the entries when you select the "pentathlon scoreboard" and "heptathlon scoreboard" links, not the individual event links.
Great run by Rainero in the 3k. They were behind the pace set by Awad in heat 1 at the 2k, but Rainero had such a strong and fast final 1k to get the win. His final 200m was 28.1.
C/M Runner wrote:
Well Princeton could make up some ground in the other finals for tomorrow.
Cornell once again has the most # of qualifiers (19), while Princeton has 14. Penn has 10, which is a pleasant surprise. Columbia has 6, Brown & Dartmouth have 5, Harvard has 4, and Yale has 1.
For the multis, I saw the entries when you select the "pentathlon scoreboard" and "heptathlon scoreboard" links, not the individual event links.
Great run by Rainero in the 3k. They were behind the pace set by Awad in heat 1 at the 2k, but Rainero had such a strong and fast final 1k to get the win. His final 200m was 28.1.
Agreed, 8:08 on that track has to be worth 8:01ish on a banked one
Makes me wonder what time Awad would have done if he wasn't in the unseeded heat.
But it's pretty crazy how they got Awad a rabbit (according to Twitter he had one, but they didn't ID who it was). They got Awad through the mile in 4:18.
So I was at heps bought the program only to have my daughters name omitted from the all time list this is her senior year. So they are sending a pdf with the corrected page but will not reprint the book. Totally disappointed especially since I was told there are a lot of mistakes...funny they got the newbies correct. This is my 3rd time requesting a correction.....why the cold shoulder to certain school sprinters??
Take your whining elsewhere Mom
Recordsaccuracy wrote:
So I was at heps bought the program only to have my daughters name omitted from the all time list this is her senior year. So they are sending a pdf with the corrected page but will not reprint the book. Totally disappointed especially since I was told there are a lot of mistakes...funny they got the newbies correct. This is my 3rd time requesting a correction.....why the cold shoulder to certain school sprinters??
I doubt the Ivy League athletic department has a bias against any school or athletes. They aren't the greatest in keeping up with records and rankings in general. I think the Ivy League doesn't really care about XC/TF in general compared to the higher profile sports like football, basketball, and hockey. Either that or their personnel is spread out thin across multiple sports and they always leave TF/XC to the last minute.
Take releasing the meet schedule. It took them until the Tuesday before the meet to release it to the public. Wouldn't you want to release it before then for parents/fans to plan their trip out to Ithaca?
Maybe the ivy should get the records right or are you a part of the problem
C/M Runner wrote:
Makes me wonder what time Awad would have done if he wasn't in the unseeded heat.
But it's pretty crazy how they got Awad a rabbit (according to Twitter he had one, but they didn't ID who it was). They got Awad through the mile in 4:18.
Lyle Wistar took him through the mile then stepped off the track. Nice to have the luxury to burn a roster spot on a rabbit...
By my watch Rainero's K splits were 2:41/2:44/2:32... Not a bad close.
chaserofsteeples wrote:
C/M Runner wrote:Makes me wonder what time Awad would have done if he wasn't in the unseeded heat.
But it's pretty crazy how they got Awad a rabbit (according to Twitter he had one, but they didn't ID who it was). They got Awad through the mile in 4:18.
Lyle Wistar took him through the mile then stepped off the track. Nice to have the luxury to burn a roster spot on a rabbit...
By my watch Rainero's K splits were 2:41/2:44/2:32... Not a bad close.
Sorry- that's 2:46/2:49/2:32
I totally agree sad part is they they knowing have errors it was correct prior to my trip to Ithaca but somehow they messed it up assured me they would fix it for future records...I believe the athletes holistically deserve correct records...kinda sad. They need to do better.
Recordsaccuracy wrote:the athletes holistically deserve correct records
What the does this even mean?
Means get the entire body of work straight nor just bits and portions.
Sorry that should be not, Being attacked for wanting correct times listed. That's a first.
let's get this back on track (no pun intended). I think this is something you need to bring up with the ivy league officials. nobody here is in a position to help you out.
Cornell leads by ten points with far more qualifiers than princeton. Has anyone done an updated projected scoring spreadsheet? As far as I know, cornell is down 2 pts in the long jump and up 2 pts in the 3000, is that correct?
llamarunner wrote:
Cornell leads by ten points with far more qualifiers than princeton. Has anyone done an updated projected scoring spreadsheet? As far as I know, cornell is down 2 pts in the long jump and up 2 pts in the 3000, is that correct?
Unfortunately, I do not have the time for me to do this this morning due to my personal schedule (I tried to do some of it during the down portions of the meet yesterday but I'm not sure I was doing it right).
I'm hoping to catch the meet today through the Ivy League Digital Network. Any word on who the broadcast announcers are going to be?
Beatiful and warm day in ithaca today. let's hopes it's not too scorcing in barton hall.