Have you ever had relations with a, "10"?

recognizer of the lame wrote:

AGIRL wrote:

That was a great article.

That was an idiotic article. All women know what attracts men. 99.999% of women do just what the article advises them to do, especially as it relates to grooming themselves for a mate. Thus, the article provides little to no constructive insight.

No bro, all women do NOT know what attracts men. And 99.999% of women do NOT do just what the article advises them to do. What, are you blind, or just stupid?

I've had relations with many 10-year-olds. That's what you meant, right?

brofest wrote:

Again if a girl is tall enough and or skinny enough she could be a "10." One girl i dated didn't really know she was attractive as she was and was super cool and down to earth. The other new exactly what buttons to push on men and was miserable to date.

You are not operating on the same scale as the rest of us if you think that.

I've been with a couple legit models as well as other casual modeling/back-up dancing types (one is now in all sorts of magazines, tv shows) and I would only call them high 8s. Being "cool and down to earth" does not a 10 make.

50 years of Ford girls include:http://nypost.com/2014/07/11/29-celebs-who-became-super-stars-from-ford-models/https://celebrity.yahoo.com/photos/famous-ford-models-1405032467-slideshow/for the record I did not post as jjjjj

.......??.. wrote:

Thanks wineturtle.

jjjjjjj wrote:

A. Wineturtle is not young. This is correct

B. He is just saying that he has a friend with the agency, and hence, he has met a lot of their working models. this also

I made out with 9.5 during a music video once. She was taller than me and was a model and all that. We're still friends. I'm pretty sure if I was taller we'd had started dating. She liked me quite a lot. Her ring of friends were model type men and women and I felt under par though, so I never pursued.

Used to be Rono wrote:

I once conducted a business meeting with a smoking hot 10. When my business partner and I walked to the parking lot afterward we both admitted that we couldn't recall most of what she'd said. We'd been dazed for 40 minutes.

My life experience permitted me to pitch a business deal to Schiffer and Macpherson without being dazed or rattled by their celebrity or beauty.

btw I was very impressed by Macphersons business mind .

As we were saying our goodbyes Macpherson said something like -when you suggested having dinner with you tonight I didn't know if you were talking business dinner or a date.

Sharp mind on that Macpherson girl, very sharp.

Dial it up wrote:

Are you honestly trying to tell me that thin, nice breasts, long legs, good skin, symmetrical facial features, and clean straight teeth isn't considered more beautiful than a 300 pound trucker with 4 teeth, and lopsided breasts that hang down to her kneecaps?

Two things:

(1) Up until recently in human history, being "fat" was considered more attractive than being thin. It is only very recently--since our poor could ironically also become fat--that being "fat" has been percieved as a character flaw and unattractive. (Of course, there are sub-cultures in this country who still prefer larger women to skinny ones.) I just think it is stupid--as do most of the men I know--to suggest that there is an objective standard that almost all men want and that women should ultimately strive to achieve. It is just dumb. The poster who said the scale is binary was dead on: you either find them attractive or you don't. That's it.

Read the comments to this video (beware if you watch the video that it is youtube level "adult") and then tell me if you think there is an objective standard:

I mean it may not be my or your ideal, but it obviously is someone's.

(2) For your sake, I have really come to hope you are a troll.

I don't really have a dog in this particular bone but the main thing to remember here is having relations with women. It's easy to judge a woman by attractive or unattractive. It's another thing to have relations with them. By doing so (having relations) you break barriers that lead to trust, commitment and responsibility. By rating these women past, present, future, you can self judge at the same time, exercising self worth and appreciation both internally and externally. If you only judge women binarily you are committing a form of sin, if you will. You are breaking the human down into just animal which it is not. The further we evolve in our surroundings the further we depart from reproduction for reproductions sake.

Ratings are all relative. A 10 to you may not be a 10 to someone else. When you love someone they become a 10.

OP in da house wrote:

If you only judge women binarily you are committing a form of sin, if you will. You are breaking the human down into just animal which it is not. The further we evolve in our surroundings the further we depart from reproduction for reproductions sake.

You missed the point. Almost completely.

Does rubbing one out to porn count?

There's no such thing as a 10.

Mundus Vult wrote:

OP in da house wrote:

If you only judge women binarily you are committing a form of sin, if you will. You are breaking the human down into just animal which it is not. The further we evolve in our surroundings the further we depart from reproduction for reproductions sake.

You missed the point. Almost completely.

Possibly, but anyone who uses a binary scale to judge women are actually self centered in the act of sex, not mutually centered in relationships which could be a one night stand and essentially, sex. It's very confusing.

Actually we are all animals

Mundus you typed a that to repeat what I already told you about chubby chasers.

I never said every single person likes the same thing, fetishes exist. It's like how murder is universally accepted as wrong, but some people still do it

Is the binary scale -10 through 10

Or 1 through 10

If you slept with her she would have to land north of 1 I guess

Dial it up wrote:

Mundus you typed a that to repeat what I already told you about chubby chasers.

I never said every single person likes the same thing, fetishes exist. It's like how murder is universally accepted as wrong, but some people still do it

I feel much better now knowign that you are a troll. Well done.

Mundus Vult wrote:

Dial it up wrote:

Mundus you typed a that to repeat what I already told you about chubby chasers.

I never said every single person likes the same thing, fetishes exist. It's like how murder is universally accepted as wrong, but some people still do it

I feel much better now knowign that you are a troll. Well done.

We've known for a while you like the big ones

Beauty is only a light switch away.