The one and only Kate Upton nude, Jennifer Lawrence nude, Justin Verlander nude thread

Here is a link to google with the pics. Completely safe site.

Mods. This is a link to google, not directly to any explicit content.

http://www.google.ie/search?q=fluxy.eu+index+of+leaks&oq=fluxy&gs_l=mobile-heirloom-serp.1.0.41j0l4.4072.6690.0.8454.6.5.0.1.1.0.287.1139.0j1j4.5.0....0...1c.1.34.mobile-heirloom-serp..0.6.1201.K6hJTueRJjc

Shit Seeking Its Own Level wrote:

Kipketer_Pumpkin_Eater, for the 19th straight week, wins the award for throwing together the greatest number of words without saying a single fúcking thing of substance. He sounds like the kind of sad middle-aged man who never did what he wanted to with his life, has no respect among those in his own age cohort, and hangs around public places to lecture 25-year-olds who are far more successful then he ever was on how they ought to conduct themselves.

Haha, one of a lot of cowards lurking in the shadows who are so spineless they have to hide behind ad hoc anonymous names I've never seen before. I can only imagine what kind of person you are in real life. Why don't you use a regular screen name and try to engage in some continuous, rational discussion? (you'd still be anonymous even then! but, ah, just amazing). You know, post some viewpoints of your own and maybe actually respond to points of mine? Totally empty criticism.

If you don't want to hear people's opinions and ethical concerns, then don't peruse threads which have ethical ramifications!

Shit Seeking Its Own Level wrote:

[...]

I mean, not to dwell on this too much and detour the thread, but What you've admitted to doing is screwed up, man. 19 weeks, you've been observing me... "stalking" me. You hide behind some name and, so, presumably, you have some rage built up about me for 19 or more weeks, and then, rather than responding to anything gradually or moderately, and to specific points, you come out and make some generalization about my character. Of course, I don't even know what posts of mine you've been reading cause you're not willing to engage in discussion whatsoever (since I like to chat about TONS of different things).

It's one thing if you make a rhetorical generalization to a poster on the spot, or some short snide joke about regulars (Ventolin's calculator, and other characters on teh forum). But you've been following me for 19 weeks or more but you won't say exactly what you've been reading or what it is...

You know, that's really creepy and disturbing?

Shit Seeking Its Own Level wrote:

Kipketer_Pumpkin_Eater, for the 19th straight week, wins the award for throwing together the greatest number of words without saying a single fúcking thing of substance. [...]

#hookup culture

#peer pressure

#sexuality

#growing up

#honesty

#human psychology

#group psychology

#emotions

#psychological/emotional consequences of hookup culture

#sexual psychology

#sexual ethics

#social media

#celebrity culture

#peer influence

#groupthink

#mass media

#promiscuous sex

#unprotected sex

#chastity

#wholesomeness

#moral standards

#consistency

These are things of substance. People--everyone--young people, parents, school administrators, lawmakers, religious figures, cultural critics, academics, journalists--discuss these matters endlessly.

Your puny little silo of a brain (that can't bring together different domains of thought and life) can't comprehend it, but there's more substance in a paragraph of what I write than your crappola-changing-name empty attacks. If what I said was truly unsubstantial--not even having a rhetorical, meta-purpose--you would not have the cause to get riled up.

To make the most degrading insult of a person--

to attack their character and say that everything they say

is outright invalid--without even making reference to anything specific--

and then do this in the context of saying, you've been

observing me for 19 weeks or more?

That's creepy and insane, and I'm going to call you out on it.

These matters are a continuation of a long line of cultural discussion, academic fields and subfields, religious concerns, political concerns, social concerns, you name it.

kdkd wrote:

Man what are you talking about? Ubiquity of sexuality among young adults? That is nonsense. Humans have sex and like sex. There's nothing wrong or unfortunate about that. This is no big deal. Hacking peoples' private lives is the big deal here.

You know what I'm talking about--you're not that dumb, else you wouldn't be in this thread. I wasn't talking about the ubiquity of sexuality itself. I'm talking about a current/ethos of our culture. You can't be that dumb. This thread is about the leaked photos. And what I'm talking about is a whole world of X-rated stuff. Unless you think that conventional marital sex on a weekend night is the equivalent of a whole world of sexuality and social politics.

I may or may not have seen most every leaked photo and video. I may or may not have went to a high school with people from all walks of life engaging in wildness and depravity you wouldn't dream of. I may or may not have witnessed for myself NCAA Division I runners--men and women--engaging in so many different things. I may or may not be continually shocked and surprised at the true nature of a whole variety of people's private lives--wilder and more bold than I had ever thought possible, and I thought I may or may not have been in other league.

I can't talk about specifics for reasons of anonymity and decorum on this board. I have seen a full spectrum of human existence. So that is why I've got a da*n opinion about it. There is such a thing as right and wrong. People get hurt. There are consequences to people's actions, there are consequences to the evolving values of a culture and subculture. I've seen culture and sexuality change in my lifetime, with the onset of different technologies, with the passing of time, with power vacuums, with successive cohorts/ages of people.

So that's why I write what I do, share some opinions and make some expressions. Where are you coming from? I can't tell when you just try to knock me down without any substance.

Some people are always taking issue when I discuss contemporary sexuality and ethics, but I can never be quite sure because they suffice to just make empty attacks on me. I made some poetic expressions, too, describing certain widespread mindsets, psychology of our communities, etc.

You are an idiot! /thread

dread runnerz wrote:

You are an idiot! /thread

Ummm, U must be gnu hear.

Your an idiot!

Can we please get back to talking about Kate Upton's fun bags?

Why are iPhone cameras so crappy? Even for low light, these photos suck.

They are photos of a mirror.