Hmm ,
One its politically motivated , Lance is the biggest of scalps to get. USADA head stands to gain if they nail Lance , its not about the sport or cleaning up anything as it is " I nailed him" focus.
Remember OJ ? bloody glove , blood in his vehicle , bedroom , motive etc etc. Guilty right ? No , if you lawyer up with a good team you stand to not be convicted.
This far from over.
In retrospect it is interesting to read the old debate.
If Lance got away with this for so long, what about the other big doppers like....? WHich begs the question- how dopped up is BerNIE "braces" lagat?
it doesn't matter if they (and wittness) are lying or telling the truth, the drugs tests are what count!
Let me give an example:
If you are in a court hearing, or inmate in prison, releasee on probation, or parolee on parole......then some family members, friends, or wittnesses states to the judge or the warden or other top offical they saw you taking drugs.....and then you were drug tested and tests were found to be negative for drugs.....you would be let go!
but lets say they demanded another test to make sure!
Okay....so you were drug tested again to make sure because the wittness were oh so so sure.........again the test was negative for drugs. In all four of these examples the accused would have to be let go and be called innocent of taking drugs......no matter how loud everyone claims the accused of taking drugs....that's how it works! Like it or not!
This I do known.
RuKiddingMe!! wrote:
it doesn't matter if they (and wittness) are lying or telling the truth, the drugs tests are what count!
Let me give an example:
If you are in a court hearing, or inmate in prison, releasee on probation, or parolee on parole......then some family members, friends, or wittnesses states to the judge or the warden or other top offical they saw you taking drugs.....and then you were drug tested and tests were found to be negative for drugs.....you would be let go!
but lets say they demanded another test to make sure!
Okay....so you were drug tested again to make sure because the wittness were oh so so sure.........again the test was negative for drugs. In all four of these examples the accused would have to be let go and be called innocent of taking drugs......no matter how loud everyone claims the accused of taking drugs....that's how it works! Like it or not!
This I do known.
Lance should have gone to the arbitration and had it thrown out then.