basically...... wrote:
'Libel' is the term you are using, top athletes can be called into question as Linda has been here, and her legal position would probably hold more water if she passed a series of random drug tests.
I'm saying that being a lawyer, she has enough resources and knowledge to sue. It's not public knowledge if she has or has not taken any drug tests. We only hear of positive testers. If Linda has tested negative she could try to build a case. To post unsubstantiated accusations about someone who has adequate legal know-how and resources is just plain stupid.