FSU's #1-ranked women's team has a supermodel in its ranks

Michael Lincecum-Williams wrote:

How about her teammate Kayleigh Tyerman?

http://www.runnerspace.com/members/photos/436/53746_full.jpg

shut up, kayleigh.

johnny hopkins wrote:

Michael Lincecum-Williams wrote:

How about her teammate Kayleigh Tyerman?

http://www.runnerspace.com/members/photos/436/53746_full.jpg

shut up, kayleigh.

Kayleigh's pic here is definitely superior to any of Colleen's. I should say though that after a bit of googling, this is definitely above average for Kayleigh.

oldoldrunner wrote:

UCSB girl on the right could be a super model.

http://www.flotrack.org/photo/651582-IMG-7299/coverage/240454

Callie Mulgannon?

Wow Unbelievable wrote:

She's a model. By what stretch of the imagination does that make her a "supermodel?"

The term has lost all meaning.

Wilhelmina is huge and known for having a very broad range of "looks". This gal has "a look" that some clients currently want.

I found this on Model Mayhem

C&P

Formally, an "editorial model" is any model used in an editorial. Which encompases models of all types.

That said, it's not what people mean when they use the term. "Editorial model" is short for "editorial fashion model", a subset of "fashion model". If you aren't a fashion model, you aren't an "editorial model" no matter how many editorials you have appeared in. Go figure.

"Editorial" is distinct from "commercial" ("fashion model" being assumed), where "commercial" means "pretty" or "generic good looks" as opposed to "distinctive beauty" for editorial. "Beautiful in her own way" (and sometimes not at all pretty) is a good description of many editorial models.

As a class they tend to have austere features, high cheek bones, full lips.{/b]

The bolded is where this gal fits and the only reason she carries a Wilhemina compcard.

She's like letsrun and not established and probably never will be. The competition is too great. Most have a day job.

Wow she is fine i would hit that for sure

OMG! That bitch looks sick. Did you see the picture of her in those blue jean shorts? She is suffuring from anorexia. She is cute in the face but her body is terrible!

pac12fan wrote:

Wow she is fine i would hit that for sure

No, this is what you call FINE.

Look at that ass, it doesnt get any better.

Nat Turner wrote:

OMG! That bitch looks sick. Did you see the picture of her in those blue jean shorts? She is suffuring from anorexia. She is cute in the face but her body is terrible!

Uhhhh, that is disgusting. I bet she does not weigh over 75 lbs.

Nat Turner wrote:

pac12fan wrote:

Wow she is fine i would hit that for sure

No, this is what you call FINE.

http://www.thebarbertwins.com/home.html

Look at that ass, it doesnt get any better.

My My My! They look delicious. You're right, the twin on the right has a PERFECT ass.

I'm with you Nat, they can have those skinny, sickly lookin blondes. Fake tits and flat asses dont turn me on.

Did you just reply to your own post under different names Nat?

Be honest now.

trollism wrote:

Did you just reply to your own post under different names Nat?

Be honest now.

I agree with ol Nat about 98% of the time, but I am not him. Consider the fact that there may be more than one brotha on this site. It used to be we all look alike, now this?

I think she is beautiful. I like my women to have the body of a 12yr old girl.

you all need to get a life.

the fact that you have enough time to analyze a freshman runner means your are all losers who don't do anything but sit on your ass all day and wish you had a life

she is attractive, end of story. who cares if she is "supermodel" attractive. stop wasting your time and go get a life you losers