Surprise! wrote:
suckas yo suckas wrote:
I would think that the best would be somewhere between a national high school champion's and a professional runner's ability.
Think about it. Basically you have guys with no cars and eating healthy. These are men that LIVED fitness. Not just an hour or two everyday. Essentially, they lived like the African runners, probably with a more-rounded fitness. Maybe a faster version of Lukas Verzbikas or however you spell his name.
Think of the origin of the marathon. That was those guys.
The one assumption everyone is making is that people actually wanted to or had motivation to see how fast they could be at a given distance.
The Ancient Olympics were also a religious festival. Winners often got statues made of them to be mounted on Mount Olympus to stand along with the Greek Gods. Virtually all Greek males were allowed to compete, but the winners were generally soldiers.
We know that ancient soldiers could peform feats that a modern solider just couldn't. And it's not just speculation or from dubioius historical sources. Archaologists can track, for example, how fast Roman soldiers could march with heavy equipment.
No doubt an Ancient Greek soldier was exceptionally fit and strong, often literally trained from birth to be a physical speciman. Those specializing in running would be national class today at least, and I'm sure over the course of the Ancient Olympics history of centuries, they produced some ridiculous talents.
The Ancient Olympic Games lasted for around 1,000 years. Modern Olympics have been around for 128 years. Professional running has been around for 50 years or so. Given that the Ancient Greeks were the most logical and intelligent people who ever lived, do you really think they wouldn't have figured out some modern training methods over 1,000 years?