The vast majority of people only care about football and basketball, where there are not many foreign student athletes. Most don’t even care if cross country exists let alone being bothered by the number of Kenyan runners.
Two of the other rotation players are Mexican and Serbian, although they were born and raised in the US.
Why can’t you just disagree with the policy? Why must you make your objection personal and insulting? This is why the country is so polarized. Rather than debate issues , the opposition shouts insults.
This executive order carries as much weight as me issuing a proclamation that I am the sexiest MF to ever walk the Earth. Trump is just pandering and distracting from tanking poll numbers, an unpopular war, and Epstein.
The executive branch does not have that right, but they do have the right to write an executive order. Congress has to approve it and judges have to side with it if challenged in court.
The executive branch has the right to write executive orders, but so do I. Congress doesn't "have" to approve anything (if Congress did, it would be a law) and there is absolutely no obligation for judges to side with it.
Executive orders direct agencies as to the manner in which they must implement orders that have already been passed.
People here complain about the current free-for-all. Then they complain about an EO to try to limit that. What would generate mostly kudos?
I agree with your sentiment, but we are a country of laws.
The current free-for-all feels like a problem. (For example, I'll guarantee that studies will show that already low graduation rates in DI football and men's basketball will get worse, and particularly for student athletes that transfer two times or more).
Trying to solve the problem via an EO that will be stricken down by the courts, that does not have legal merit or buy in by any or all parties, is simply not the way to go.
The executive branch does not have that right, but they do have the right to write an executive order. Congress has to approve it and judges have to side with it if challenged in court.
Great. We’re $39T in debt and Trump is going to piss away millions of dollars trying to defend his unconstitutional executive order. Trumpers are idiots.
Really? Millions of dollars were just spent paying Congress(both sides) for two weeks of doing nothing. If you are attributing these ideas to Trump rather than to the panel he convened..good..LOL. All of it is better than what is going on now.
Great. We’re $39T in debt and Trump is going to piss away millions of dollars trying to defend his unconstitutional executive order. Trumpers are idiots.
Really? Millions of dollars were just spent paying Congress(both sides) for two weeks of doing nothing. If you are attributing these ideas to Trump rather than to the panel he convened..good..LOL. All of it is better than what is going on now.
Congress, both sides, should not even touch this legislation, they are clueless on the even more important stuff, and an embarrassment to this country at this point.
People here complain about the current free-for-all. Then they complain about an EO to try to limit that. What would generate mostly kudos?
I think what would generate kudos is an actual plan (i.e., not written in an afternoon on the back of a napkin). One formulated by experts who actually know the issues and potential consequences and who consult all of the stakeholders. The latter group would include colleges outside of the Power 5 conferences, coaches from non-revenue sports and, most importantly, student-athletes themselves.
D1 football and basketball are the new shamateurism. Student-athletes finally got the right to sign NIL deals, but then the coaches decided they would parcel out the money, so they still have the power. Meanwhile, coaches, AD's and conference presidents get 6- and 7-figure salaries and have more power than the university presidents and professors. Some of these colleges look more like semi-pro teams than institutions of higher learning.