You don't explain it anywhere. You rely on the standard error of "correlation, therefore causation" and also vague assumptions. You presented a conclusion and now insist you've made an argument, when most of your posts are a sentence or two at most. Indulge us and make the argument "again." Lay out your argument in full in a single post and let it be at that, people will either agree with it or disagree with it. I wouldn't post further if you'd just make an actual, logical argument, whether I agree with it or not. But you won't, because as the thread shows, it's not your style. (And you're still trying to distract from your supposed point by continually referencing the owners of major franchises).