Flagpole wrote:
This isn't hot or juicy or degenerate or anything. Three people have what appears to be a consenting relationship. Big freakin' deal.
I agree but polygamy is outlawed in all 50 states. When the gay marriage thing came through, the conservatives said the next thing that was coming was polygamy. I guess they were correct.
ronald mexico, esq wrote:
[/quote
Ms. Reynolds has changed her FB profile name to Begley so there may be more legal stuff going on here than one might think.
i can change my last name on facebook to kipchoge-bekele, does this mean we are legal?
to the guy who runs 120-130 a week and go cheated on, i'm sure andrew will save you a seat next to him in the closet so you can both watch from a distance.[/quote]
So you admit you can't read. Thanks.
i've read every post wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
This isn't hot or juicy or degenerate or anything. Three people have what appears to be a consenting relationship. Big freakin' deal.
I agree but polygamy is outlawed in all 50 states. When the gay marriage thing came through, the conservatives said the next thing that was coming was polygamy. I guess they were correct.
This Stephanie person is not married to either of them. Nothing illegal about it. Odd that conservatives are ones who typically want FREEDOM. Nothing more free than being able to love the adult person or even persons you want to love. Polygamy is a discussion for another day though. They are not engaging in that...Stephanie is not married to either of them.
i've read every post wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
This isn't hot or juicy or degenerate or anything. Three people have what appears to be a consenting relationship. Big freakin' deal.
I agree but polygamy is outlawed in all 50 states. When the gay marriage thing came through, the conservatives said the next thing that was coming was polygamy. I guess they were correct.
The only reason it hasn’t been legalized sooner is because taxes will be - I assume - pretty complicated. There’s really no good moral objection; if two women is ok, why not a woman and a man and another woman?
wado?
Sapel wrote:
And Salazar gets crap???
I know you think you are being clever, but you are not.
Observer of one thing wrote:
Hear me out on this... wrote:
Okay, so I opened the thread figuring it was going to be good for some laughs, but as I went through this I thought there actually be some merits to this arrangement.
As someone who is still training pretty hard into his 30s (120-130 mpw) while working 50-60 hours at a fairly demanding corporate job. I rarely have the energy to satisfy my wife as much as she would like. When my ex had an affair with other men years ago it hurt like hell, but somehow the idea of my SO being with another woman isn’t hurtful at all since there is no physical penetration involved (other than maybe an adult toy)
Along the lines of not having enough time - having another woman around to help with kids and chores would free up some time for me to get back to running triples again. If this woman could get even a part time minimum wage job to help out with some bills we would be better off financially as well.
We have no ties to this woman legally - so we wouldn’t be responsible for her medical bills if something catastrophic were to happen to her. My wife and mine social security would also go to each other and not this 2nd woman.
I guess if things are occasionally non-platonic between me and the 2nd woman that would be a cherry on top, but as I mentioned earlier I rarely even have the energy for my wife anymore even though I recognize that she is extremely attractive and love her more than anything in the world.
Ms. Reynolds has changed her FB profile name to Begley so there may be more legal stuff going on here than one might think.
Bigamy is illegal in the US. So I am not sure what "legal stuff" there is. Of course she could legally change her name.
There is nothing particularly wrong about Begley's "family" except it seems obvious Andrew is an afterthought in the photos, at least. I guess they're trying to stay together because of their "brand," to the two people in Atlanta who care. I personally have heard about these arrangements being made before the couple calls it quits.
For two seconds I forgot about COVID so thanks to the original poster for the breaking news.
Wouldn't want my son or daughter be coached by such a person of questionable morals.
thoughts and prayers wrote:
Dirty Dion wrote:
A lot of quick replies to call Andrew a cuc k. How you know he ain’t got the magic stick?
he looks like an afterthought in all photos they posted.
assumptions have been made based on this.
Agreed, nothing wrong with the arrangement except that it certainly appears he's getting the short end of the stick.
TMADDDHASFNE wrote:
Wouldn't want my son or daughter be coached by such a person of questionable morals.
There is nothing in her post that shows questionable morals. They are all consenting adults. The fact that you wouldn't want an Olympian coaching your child because she has different beliefs in love than you is incredibly narrow minded. They all look happy and I applaud them for not hiding their true selves for judgmental individuals like yourself.
fml wrote:
TMADDDHASFNE wrote:
Wouldn't want my son or daughter be coached by such a person of questionable morals.
There is nothing in her post that shows questionable morals. They are all consenting adults. The fact that you wouldn't want an Olympian coaching your child because she has different beliefs in love than you is incredibly narrow minded. They all look happy and I applaud them for not hiding their true selves for judgmental individuals like yourself.
CORRECT!
fml wrote:
There is nothing in her post that shows questionable morals. They are all consenting adults. The fact that you wouldn't want an Olympian coaching your child because she has different beliefs in love than you is incredibly narrow minded. They all look happy and I applaud them for not hiding their true selves for judgmental individuals like yourself.
Ok but where do you draw the line? You apparently draw the line at consenting adults. But why do you draw it there? Why can't a man make love to a boy like the Greeks? Or should we go in the other extreme and ban all relationships until 25+ as the brain isn't formed until then?
The dude is clearly a chump financially supporting a lesbian couple and being a house boy/servant.
i've read every post wrote:
fml wrote:
There is nothing in her post that shows questionable morals. They are all consenting adults. The fact that you wouldn't want an Olympian coaching your child because she has different beliefs in love than you is incredibly narrow minded. They all look happy and I applaud them for not hiding their true selves for judgmental individuals like yourself.
Ok but where do you draw the line? You apparently draw the line at consenting adults. But why do you draw it there? Why can't a man make love to a boy like the Greeks? Or should we go in the other extreme and ban all relationships until 25+ as the brain isn't formed until then?
Did you fail reading comprehension? I said consenting adults. Children (and animals) are not consenting adults. I am not arguing with you about when an adult brain develops.
I'm not sure how you pronounce it or anything, but I believe it's menage a trois.
Flagpole wrote:
Odd that conservatives are ones who typically want FREEDOM. Nothing more free than being able to love the adult person or even persons you want to love. Polygamy is a discussion for another day though. They are not engaging in that...Stephanie is not married to either of them.
"it's not polygamy because they're not technically married" yeah because it's against the law, not because they have made a conscious choice about the matter and declined the option
Whether it's degenerate or not is a matter of people's perspective.
These three can structure their lives as they see fit. Perhaps I am reading a lot into the pictures, but it seems the husband is the third wheel. It doesn’t seem like a healthy way to heal a broken heart or to move on with life. It makes me sad.
i've read every post wrote:
Ok but where do you draw the line? You apparently draw the line at consenting adults. But why do you draw it there? Why can't a man make love to a boy like the Greeks? Or should we go in the other extreme and ban all relationships until 25+ as the brain isn't formed until then?
*Jerry Seinfeld voice*
So what’s the deal with consent?!