Who is David? The 400 i ran in high school was freshman year during a dual meet so you don't know what you are talking about. Also high school did zero speed work and ran about 10 to 15 miles a week our couch was a substitute teacher.
Who is David? The 400 i ran in high school was freshman year during a dual meet so you don't know what you are talking about. Also high school did zero speed work and ran about 10 to 15 miles a week our couch was a substitute teacher.
BadIdea wrote:
Not a very good idea. I know guys,who can't break 54 but could still break 4 in the mile.... In high school I could barely run 58 for 400m but had High School bests of:
400m: 58.21
800m: 2:01.00
1500m: 4:06.89
1600m: 4:24.35
3200m: 9:19.66
5000m: 16:08.00
10,000m: 33:16.00
5k XC: 15:31.00
College was a whole different ball park:
200m: 22.25
400m: 47.97
800m: 1:51.96
1000m: 2:24.35
1500m: 3:45.09
MILE: 4:04.35
3000m: 8:16.25
5000m: 14:17.05
10,000m: 29:05.07
5k XC: 14:51.00
8k XC: 24:27.00
10k XC: 30:56.00
58 to 48 is bullsh*t. Just improving to 56 would be an achievement.
I wonder, David. Why not an Ivy or Stanford David?
Not fast enough wrote:
I wonder, David. Why not an Ivy or Stanford David?
Because I couldn't get in
BadIdea wrote:
Not a very good idea. I know guys,who can't break 54 but could still break 4 in the mile.... In high school I could barely run 58 for 400m but had High School bests of:
400m: 58.21
800m: 2:01.00
1500m: 4:06.89
1600m: 4:24.35
3200m: 9:19.66
5000m: 16:08.00
10,000m: 33:16.00
5k XC: 15:31.00
College was a whole different ball park:
200m: 22.25
400m: 47.97
800m: 1:51.96
1000m: 2:24.35
1500m: 3:45.09
MILE: 4:04.35
3000m: 8:16.25
5000m: 14:17.05
10,000m: 29:05.07
5k XC: 14:51.00
8k XC: 24:27.00
10k XC: 30:56.00
Lol
You aren't fooling anyone. You don't go from 58 to 47 in 4 years. Get off here you loser liar.
if you can run fast with minimal training you idiot
jesus f*cken christ wrote:
if you can run fast with minimal training you idiot
And what is "fast" and "minimal training"?
I had someone that I thought was slow. They usually just struggling to keep up and probably ran too hard. Eventually they progressed to the point that they didn’t struggle to keep up and the workouts were long enough that they had to slow to more of a threshold pace. They came back faster every time they did a threshold paced run.
Talent could be a high baseline fitness or being a high responder to training. Some people will never train enough to find out that they are talented.
an ok coach wrote:
I had someone that I thought was slow. They usually just struggling to keep up and probably ran too hard. Eventually they progressed to the point that they didn’t struggle to keep up and the workouts were long enough that they had to slow to more of a threshold pace. They came back faster every time they did a threshold paced run.
Talent could be a high baseline fitness or being a high responder to training. Some people will never train enough to find out that they are talented.
I have been training for over a year, and I still haven't responded
You're not training if you're just shuffling along at 12 minute pace every day. Do you do any workouts?
Yes. This is my training plan here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AwrPr6qL5WZg6YLh7x4t7HWj_0ClUtnS/view?usp=sharing
Which highly selectives did you apply to? Are you Asian or white? Why were you rejected when you voukd have gone to Stanford for free?
I will search you out on the club team this fall.
4 years? I took 2 off before I went to college and trained. But hey you know more than me!
mac truck wrote:
Which highly selectives did you apply to? Are you Asian or white? Why were you rejected when you voukd have gone to Stanford for free?
David said he was white in another thread.
mac truck wrote:
I will search you out on the club team this fall.
Why are you stalking me? How would you even know what university I am going to?
donuts wrote:
mac truck wrote:
Which highly selectives did you apply to? Are you Asian or white? Why were you rejected when you voukd have gone to Stanford for free?
David said he was white in another thread.
Correct
mac truck wrote:
I will search you out on the club team this fall.
Are you in UCLA?
So this you are playing now wrote:
BadIdea wrote:
Not a very good idea. I know guys,who can't break 54 but could still break 4 in the mile.... In high school I could barely run 58 for 400m but had High School bests of:
400m: 58.21
800m: 2:01.00
1500m: 4:06.89
1600m: 4:24.35
3200m: 9:19.66
5000m: 16:08.00
10,000m: 33:16.00
5k XC: 15:31.00
College was a whole different ball park:
200m: 22.25
400m: 47.97
800m: 1:51.96
1000m: 2:24.35
1500m: 3:45.09
MILE: 4:04.35
3000m: 8:16.25
5000m: 14:17.05
10,000m: 29:05.07
5k XC: 14:51.00
8k XC: 24:27.00
10k XC: 30:56.00
Lol
You aren't fooling anyone. You don't go from 58 to 47 in 4 years. Get off here you loser liar.
I actually believe him. If he didn’t train his speed at all and wasn’t coached well in hs i could see it.
indoorszn wrote:
So this you are playing now wrote:
Lol
You aren't fooling anyone. You don't go from 58 to 47 in 4 years. Get off here you loser liar.
I actually believe him. If he didn’t train his speed at all and wasn’t coached well in hs i could see it.
No, it's crap. Someone that could run 47 and 29:05 would run the 800 in 1:45. The times are made up and he doesn't know enough about track to make up believable fake PRs.