Observation from 27 years of life: People in the Northern Hemisphere believe in the globe. People in the Southern Hemisphere do not believe in the globe. That is all I have to say about this.
Observation from 27 years of life: People in the Northern Hemisphere believe in the globe. People in the Southern Hemisphere do not believe in the globe. That is all I have to say about this.
Ginkgo Biloba wrote:
A hemisphere doesn't fit a flat object. The hint is in the last part of the word.
Plus the Southern "Hemicircle" would flood if it were concave.
I'm interested in knowing how Antarctica has fossils of trees on it. Did the sun used to have a wider "sweep"?
Plate Tectonics??
Average LRCer wrote:
Ginkgo Biloba wrote:A hemisphere doesn't fit a flat object. The hint is in the last part of the word.
Plus the Southern "Hemicircle" would flood if it were concave.
I'm interested in knowing how Antarctica has fossils of trees on it. Did the sun used to have a wider "sweep"?
Plate Tectonics??
I think it more of a question of Technotronics. I fell that this video illustrates what our planet is really all about.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EcjWd-O4jImaj eht pu pmup wrote:
Average LRCer wrote:Plate Tectonics??
I think it more of a question of Technotronics. I fell that this video illustrates what our planet is really all about.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EcjWd-O4jI
That video explains human existence...a big mistake
Average LRCer wrote:
Ginkgo Biloba wrote:A hemisphere doesn't fit a flat object. The hint is in the last part of the word.
Plus the Southern "Hemicircle" would flood if it were concave.
I'm interested in knowing how Antarctica has fossils of trees on it. Did the sun used to have a wider "sweep"?
Plate Tectonics??
If the Antarctic plate spread around the whole outside of the plate the middle would have caved in.
Hard to have plate tectonics on a flat surface anyway. You need a hot core for that.
Ginkgo Biloba wrote:
Average LRCer wrote:Plate Tectonics??
If the Antarctic plate spread around the whole outside of the plate the middle would have caved in.
Hard to have plate tectonics on a flat surface anyway. You need a hot core for that.
That's what she said
China is in on the conspiracy too: http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/01/asia/china-moon-photos-jade-rabbit/index.html
Look how flat the Chinese horizon is compared to the NASA's faked pictures.
I honestly believe that the Earth is shaped like a pringle chip. Always have. Always will
Not a globe wrote:
There is absolutely no proof, not one photo that the Earth is a globe
4k ultra HD of the Earth being spherical (globe):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_-ZVBqU7L8Also,
There is absolutely no proof, not one photo that the Earth is flat.
Dum, dum, dum, dum, duuuum wrote:
Not a globe wrote:There is absolutely no proof, not one photo that the Earth is a globe
4k ultra HD of the Earth being spherical (globe):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_-ZVBqU7L8Also,
There is absolutely no proof, not one photo that the Earth is flat.
FAKE AF
Dum, dum, dum, dum, duuuum wrote:
Not a globe wrote:There is absolutely no proof, not one photo that the Earth is a globe
4k ultra HD of the Earth being spherical (globe):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_-ZVBqU7L8Also,
There is absolutely no proof, not one photo that the Earth is flat.
Absolutely cannot believe the BS that NASA puts out there.
Dum, dum, dum, dum, duuuum wrote:
Not a globe wrote:There is absolutely no proof, not one photo that the Earth is a globe
4k ultra HD of the Earth being spherical (globe):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_-ZVBqU7L8Also,
There is absolutely no proof, not one photo that the Earth is flat.
That video is a complete joke.
lindy-loo wrote:
Look how flat the Chinese horizon is compared to the NASA's faked pictures.
Where are the stars?
"So you think America actually landed men on the moon? Well, think again. We have proof that the moon landings in the late 60’s and early 70’s were all a big lie!
To start with, keep in mind that there was only about 100 people involved in the moon landing hoax. Mission Control in Houston as well as most of the men and women who worked on this project nearly 40 years ago had no idea it was a fake. But how is this possible? Very simple.
The power elite who put on this fiasco never let anyone see too big of picture. The thousands of people involved only had their small part to worry about. Mission control was in Houston. The launch site in Florida. The engineers, mechanics, computer programmers etc, didn’t have jobs that mixed with each other. So most people couldn’t figure out the whole thing amounted to a Hollywood production.
In, 1962, then President John Kennedy said he had a vision of America “putting a man on the moon and returning him safely†before the decade is out. Now, we don’t know if at the time Kennedy knew this was impossible or not but shortly after his murder in 1963, the best rocket scientists in the world involved with the project informed Lyndon Johnson that science is at least 30 years away from being able to accomplish such a task. The fact is…they were a little optimistic. Here we are nearly 40 years later and we still don’t have the technology to send a man to the moon and return him safely to earth. The powers that decided on this fraud concluded that if they couldn’t send a man to the moon and get him back safely, then what would they do is to have NASA fake the project then keep the billions of taxpayer money used to fund this operation for themselves. They then decided they actually could “fake†the whole thing for a fraction of the money they were being supplied. Here’s a site in Iceland where we found alot of the NASA fakes were made, (See link above).
Here are some facts to keep in mind about the impossibilty of actually sending a human being to the moon: The moon is constantly being bombarded with “micrometeors†that travel at speeds of 20,000 mph. To keep that in perspective a rifle bullet travels at 800 mph. Remember the moon has no atmosphere to slow them down. If any astronaut or the Lunar landing module got hit with just one of those……even if it were the size of a grain of rice, that would be the end. Strange NASA wasn’t too concerned about this at the time, don’t you think?
This one is incredibly funny! This is supposed to be the frogmen to rescue the Apollo men. Look at the fake “kite string†that is on top the the module. This is supposed to be the string that held the parachutes that brought the module to earth. I would think it would require heavy ropes for such a task. By the way, if this is same space module that brought the astronauts home then where is the area that they docked and climbed into the Lunar Module? Was it the same place? It had to be….but they also had to have the parachutes in the same place. So where are the parachutes in this photo? How was there room to get through the opening into the lunar module with the parachutes stored there? Also, look at the fake breathing respirators on their mouths so they wouldn’t spread “Moon germs†to the frog men. Okay, what about the “moon germs†that are inside the module? what about the “moon germs†on their body? Are those moon germs less threatening than what they might breathe out? Maybe since NASA can’t tell us how the Apollo men went to the bathroom for two weeks, We are thinking the frog men should have the gas masks on for any nasty stuff the Apollo men might have brought back! By the way, the “Apollo men†are on the rafts and have been for at least 10 minutes, what is the “frog man†still doing swimming in the ocean? Looking for the great white shark ? Or is he looking for a carp to eat tonight? Come on
-Neil Armstrong's boot prints don't match! Different tread, see link for pics
-Neil Armstrong's space suit doesn't match! Helmet hookups different
-You guys were in space or “on the moon†for nearly two weeks…how did you go to the bathroom? NASA never really told us that
There are more gems, just read the entire article in the link above. Hilarious!
I agree that the whole moon landing broadcast was a Hollywood production. But I still am not sold on a flat earth
Look at this one picture that utterly destroys NASA's credibility. From Apollo 12 there is a picture of Pete Conrad standing on the moon. Look at the reflection from his helmet. It shows 2 astronauts. How is that possible? Apollo 12 had 2 astronauts that landed in the lunar module (Conrad and Alan Bean). and one astronaut orbiting the moon (Richard Gordon) the entire time who never landed. Busted!!!! We never landed on the moon. NASA lied. We been duped. Scroll down to see Pete Conrad pic.
TIL two things
1. You can support almost any theory, if you don't mind making increasingly convoluted explanations, and you dismiss every piece of evidence disproving your theory as a hoax ... or at least the ones you don't ignore.
2. People actually do this.
I guess I didn't really 'learn' either, so much as I 'gained an appreciation' for them.
Also the fact that I read all 30 pages is indefensible. But I did really like the Asimov bit. That guy was awesome.
What sucks is I used to believe that we went to the moon. I became a flat earth believer in Aug of 2015. Up until then, I was a die hard globalist like everyone else. We will never establish a moon base, we will never send people to Mars, we will never become like "Star Trek" and travel the stars.
In the flat earth model, our planet is stationary and the sun and moon revolve around us. The ancients were correct. Copernicus is wrong. The earth is flat, deal with it.
Bill Bowerman urinated on Phil Knight.