President-elect Donald Trump’s defense secretary pick, Pete Hegseth, paid a woman who accused him of sexual assault in a settlement agreement that included a confidentiality clause, according to Hegseth’s attorney.
President-elect Donald Trump has said he will nominate Gaetz for attorney general, despite the recently ended ethics probe of alleged sexual misconduct and illicit drug use.
The story starts when a Florida Tax collector got himself in trouble with the law. Joel Greenberg who knew Gaetz, was involved in a sex trafficking ring and he was eventually sentenced for it. It consisted of getting girls for sugar daddy's and at least one was a minor. However Joel did a plea bargain where he lies and tried to implicate Matt Gaetz. For political reasons the press jumped all over this. Joel isn't reliable. He has 33 felonies the list of amazingly stupid things he did is enormous. *Sex trafficking *Stalking *Wire fraud *Bribery *Conspiracy to defraud the government *Identity theft I*Impersonating a cop (twice) *Created fake businesses and got them loans, he also got them covid bucks. *He spent 3.5 million on "consultants" who were all his close friends who attended his wedding. *Used tax money to buy and office and crypto mining machines. *He had too many plugged in and it set the building on fire. *He created fake IDs for the girls he trafficked and paid them on venmo. *He created a fake letter to smear a political opponent who was a teacher by pretending to be a male student in a sexual relationship with him. Left his finger prints on the envelope. *He also created fake Facebook a.d Twitter account is to label the guy z white separatist. *Spent 15k on remote water sprinklers outside his office that he could aim at people. *Brought MDNA to his sugar babies parties But the ethic committee in congress is going to listen to Joel who confessed to 6 of the felonies and is spending 11 years in jail. Because they politically want to target Matt Gaetz. Gaetz opposed the hate speech laws labeling criticism of Israel as anti-semitism. This other crook Steven Alford tried to blackmail Gaetz's father (25 million) claiming he could get Matt Gaetz a pardon for a sex trafficking allegation. But only if he gave him money that would be used to get a spy out of Iran, Robert Levinson. (CIA) Gaetz thinks the DOJ leaked information that they were investigating him to the extortionist and that they limited the case to a couple fall guys when it was a much larger network. In the end Joel and Alford were convicted. Nothing was found on Gaetz and Levinson is still Iran if he is even alive. Someone was trying to ensnare and blackmail rich American politicians so they could attempt to set free a spy in Iran. Here is the weird part. Yeah that wasn't even the weird part yet. When Gaetz was bring strong armed he went right to TV on the Tucker Carlson show and named his accusers. He named lawyers on TV and called them blackmailers. David McGee and Bob Kent. (Steven Alford worked with them.) Gaetz said when his father was approached to give them 25M he went right to the FBI and they had him wear a wire.
Why didn't the Garland Justice System indict him after a 2 year investigation?
You asked that question at least three times in this thread. It was answered for you every time. What is wrong with you that you keep repeating a question already asked and answered? It's weird.
Why didn't the Garland Justice System indict him after a 2 year investigation?
You asked that question at least three times in this thread. It was answered for you every time. What is wrong with you that you keep repeating a question already asked and answered? It's weird.
It has not been properly answered.
The answer is that did not have sufficient evidence to indict.
You asked that question at least three times in this thread. It was answered for you every time. What is wrong with you that you keep repeating a question already asked and answered? It's weird.
It has not been properly answered.
The answer is that did not have sufficient evidence to indict.
No, the answer is not necessarily that they didn't have the evidence to indict. The DOJ's first inquiry is whether they have enough evidence to indict. But the DOJ then assesses the likelihood of conviction in light of the likely jury pool, the presentation of the witnesses and other factors. This is the process because the DOJ wants a high probability of winning before they commit resources to a trial. So the fact that the DOJ thought there was enouth evidence to indict (given the information regarding the evidence) is just at likely as the DOJ deciding that there was not enough evidence to indict. This has been explained to you several times, including in this thread, and you dishonestly pretend otherwise.
The answer is that did not have sufficient evidence to indict.
No, the answer is not necessarily that they didn't have the evidence to indict. The DOJ's first inquiry is whether they have enough evidence to indict. But the DOJ then assesses the likelihood of conviction in light of the likely jury pool, the presentation of the witnesses and other factors. This is the process because the DOJ wants a high probability of winning before they commit resources to a trial. So the fact that the DOJ thought there was enouth evidence to indict (given the information regarding the evidence) is just at likely as the DOJ deciding that there was not enough evidence to indict. This has been explained to you several times, including in this thread, and you dishonestly pretend otherwise.
And worth noting that the Trump transition team is lying when they state that the DOJ cleared Gaetz of all charges. The DOJ neither finds a target of investigation guilty, or innocent. That is a job for a judge and/or jury. The DOJ decides whether to bring charges and prosecute.
And worth noting that the Trump transition team is lying when they state that the DOJ cleared Gaetz of all charges. The DOJ neither finds a target of investigation guilty, or innocent. That is a job for a judge and/or jury. The DOJ decides whether to bring charges and prosecute.
Young men look up to our country's leaders as role models. As a result of Trump's actions, both personally and that of his cabinet appointments (Gaetz), they will become emboldened to sexually prey upon and abuse girls and young women and justify it as acceptable behavior since all our new leaders have done it. Furthermore, they are led to believe that even if accused, they can just deny, deny, deny, and nothing will come of it.
No, the answer is not necessarily that they didn't have the evidence to indict. The DOJ's first inquiry is whether they have enough evidence to indict. But the DOJ then assesses the likelihood of conviction in light of the likely jury pool, the presentation of the witnesses and other factors. This is the process because the DOJ wants a high probability of winning before they commit resources to a trial. So the fact that the DOJ thought there was enouth evidence to indict (given the information regarding the evidence) is just at likely as the DOJ deciding that there was not enough evidence to indict. This has been explained to you several times, including in this thread, and you dishonestly pretend otherwise.
And worth noting that the Trump transition team is lying when they state that the DOJ cleared Gaetz of all charges. The DOJ neither finds a target of investigation guilty, or innocent. That is a job for a judge and/or jury. The DOJ decides whether to bring charges and prosecute.
Yes it is very difficult to obtain a guilty verdict for statutory rape charges. Especially when Gaetz was paying young prostitutes to join him at his drug and sex parties. Defense attorneys slut shame and this is why indictments are rare. And convictions are even rarer.
Plus Joel Greenberg is a terrible eyewitness
If anyone is calling a decision not to indict a declaration of innocence they don’t get it. Or they are a dishonest liar.
Gaetz daddy was a big shot in Fl Senate so he got Matty off on his DUI.
Matty had a college Roomy die mysteriously of auto asphyxiation and nobody ever questioned why.
Everyone in congress knows Matt from his desire to share self porn on his phone to grown adults and his contest of having the most sex with Aides and reporters. They despise him in his own party.
You asked that question at least three times in this thread. It was answered for you every time. What is wrong with you that you keep repeating a question already asked and answered? It's weird.
It has not been properly answered.
The answer is that did not have sufficient evidence to indict.