Just to be clear, you are saying the Financial Times, one of the most respected newspapers in the world, is deluded and stupid.
M’aga does such a great job at making themselves into liars and morans.
The current staff writing for the Times didn't build the reputation any more than the leftist morons currently disgracing the New York Times built the reputation of that paper.
No one who buys groceries believes your propaganda.
Thank GOD you have tik tok, fox and trump to tell you what is actually going on.
If I am a cultists who is my supposed leader? You claim to not be a cultist but regardless of circumstances you blindly defend the King Turd.
You know absolute nothing about me financial but claim I am broke? Thanks for proving my point that Trumpers are delusion and loyal to the point of their own undoing. Truly sad.
Compared to Trump you are broke moron.
You're clearly in the TDS cult whether you're too delusional to realize it or not.
Tell us more about how the billionaire who became the US president is a failure.
You can dislike the man for many reasons without resorting to arguments which make you sound like a goddamn moron.
You're right bro - I forgot Truth Social is a raging success!!
So, even Sally admits that Trump is guilty as charged.
Sally's only objection is that Trump should not be prosecuted. Absolutely no possibility that Trump is actually innocent.
Fascinating
I have no idea if Trump is guilty as charged. He DOES have the presumption of innocence which I know you would be totally on board with. Again, Trump is innocent and you have to agree with that, yes? If things change we can say differently but Trump is innocent -end of discussion.
He's charged with a crime that doesn't exist...
It's a misdemeanor book keeping charge and for political reason the corrupt DA has used absurd mental gymnastics to try to turn into into a federal felony.
If it was actually a federal felony it wouldn't even be in his jurisdiction. The case is idiotic on every level.
So, even Sally admits that Trump is guilty as charged.
Sally's only objection is that Trump should not be prosecuted. Absolutely no possibility that Trump is actually innocent.
Fascinating
I have no idea if Trump is guilty as charged. He DOES have the presumption of innocence which I know you would be totally on board with. Again, Trump is innocent and you have to agree with that, yes? If things change we can say differently but Trump is innocent -end of discussion.
No. You have already admitted that Trump is guilty as charged.
I have no idea if Trump is guilty as charged. He DOES have the presumption of innocence which I know you would be totally on board with. Again, Trump is innocent and you have to agree with that, yes? If things change we can say differently but Trump is innocent -end of discussion.
No. You have already admitted that Trump is guilty as charged.
I have no idea if Trump is guilty as charged. He DOES have the presumption of innocence which I know you would be totally on board with. Again, Trump is innocent and you have to agree with that, yes? If things change we can say differently but Trump is innocent -end of discussion.
No. You have already admitted that Trump is guilty as charged.
Can't un-admit that. Doesn't work that way.
Again.. because you're stupid...
The NDA existed BEFORE Trump ran for office.
This simple fact destroys any possible argument that the payments broke campaign finance law.
I have no idea if Trump is guilty as charged. He DOES have the presumption of innocence which I know you would be totally on board with. Again, Trump is innocent and you have to agree with that, yes? If things change we can say differently but Trump is innocent -end of discussion.
He's charged with a crime that doesn't exist...
It's a misdemeanor book keeping charge and for political reason the corrupt DA has used absurd mental gymnastics to try to turn into into a federal felony.
If it was actually a federal felony it wouldn't even be in his jurisdiction. The case is idiotic on every level.
Except campaign finance laws do exist and it will be proven Trump broke them. Lock him the fk up. You are in a cult.
No. You have already admitted that Trump is guilty as charged.
Can't un-admit that. Doesn't work that way.
Again.. because you're stupid...
The NDA existed BEFORE Trump ran for office.
This simple fact destroys any possible argument that the payments broke campaign finance law.
oboy.
You people really do need to read a newspaper. I mean seriously.
The crime is not the NDA. The crime is the campaign finance and accounting.
those took place in 2016. just before the election.
Come on. Try. Try real hard.
On January 12, 2018, The Wall Street Journal reported that in October 2016, just before the 2016 United States presidential election, Michael Cohen, lawyer for then-presidential candidate Donald Trump, arranged a payment of US$130,000 to pornographic film actress Stormy Daniels to stop her disclosing an affair she and Trump allegedly had in July 2006
This simple fact destroys any possible argument that the payments broke campaign finance law.
oboy.
You people really do need to read a newspaper. I mean seriously.
The crime is not the NDA. The crime is the campaign finance and accounting.
those took place in 2016. just before the election.
Come on. Try. Try real hard.
On January 12, 2018, The Wall Street Journal reported that in October 2016, just before the 2016 United States presidential election, Michael Cohen, lawyer for then-presidential candidate Donald Trump, arranged a payment of US$130,000 to pornographic film actress Stormy Daniels to stop her disclosing an affair she and Trump allegedly had in July 2006
It's a misdemeanor book keeping charge and for political reason the corrupt DA has used absurd mental gymnastics to try to turn into into a federal felony.
If it was actually a federal felony it wouldn't even be in his jurisdiction. The case is idiotic on every level.
Except campaign finance laws do exist and it will be proven Trump broke them. Lock him the fk up. You are in a cult.
He didn't commit the crime... it can't be proven and every legal scholar who isn't a political hack admits this.
Hush money isn't a felony. There is no precedent for this.
You're so excited about the possible outcome that you're ignoring reality and the law... because YOU are in a cult.
This simple fact destroys any possible argument that the payments broke campaign finance law.
oboy.
You people really do need to read a newspaper. I mean seriously.
The crime is not the NDA. The crime is the campaign finance and accounting.
those took place in 2016. just before the election.
Come on. Try. Try real hard.
On January 12, 2018, The Wall Street Journal reported that in October 2016, just before the 2016 United States presidential election, Michael Cohen, lawyer for then-presidential candidate Donald Trump, arranged a payment of US$130,000 to pornographic film actress Stormy Daniels to stop her disclosing an affair she and Trump allegedly had in July 2006
If you weren't stupid you would understand why the existence of the NDA proves the payments weren't campaign finance violations.
Nevermind the fact that Trump was spending his own f*cking money...
You people really do need to read a newspaper. I mean seriously.
The crime is not the NDA. The crime is the campaign finance and accounting.
those took place in 2016. just before the election.
Come on. Try. Try real hard.
On January 12, 2018, The Wall Street Journal reported that in October 2016, just before the 2016 United States presidential election, Michael Cohen, lawyer for then-presidential candidate Donald Trump, arranged a payment of US$130,000 to pornographic film actress Stormy Daniels to stop her disclosing an affair she and Trump allegedly had in July 2006
If you weren't stupid you would understand why the existence of the NDA proves the payments weren't campaign finance violations.
Nevermind the fact that Trump was spending his own f*cking money...
lol...
would be SWEET if you explained your theory for us!
And also explain why the hush money and crimes took place just ONE MONTH before the election!
Except campaign finance laws do exist and it will be proven Trump broke them. Lock him the fk up. You are in a cult.
He didn't commit the crime... it can't be proven and every legal scholar who isn't a political hack admits this.
Hush money isn't a felony. There is no precedent for this.
You're so excited about the possible outcome that you're ignoring reality and the law... because YOU are in a cult.
I guess the judge and jury are also so excited about the possible outcome that they will ignore reality and the law. Witch hunt because no way its ever possible for Trump to be guilty of anything ever.
Campaign fiance laws and falsifying records... could've been any other type of payment, but it happens he paid off a p0rnstar because he knew he'd lose the election if it had come out.
well son, that's why criminals and amoral clods like Trump aren't supposed to run for office. Because we don't want terrible people, who have to pay hush money to porn stars and then cook the books to hide the payments the month before the election, to run our fine nation.
You want to pay off the women, fine, do it, but probably you don't want to run for office. And if you do, we've decided that the voters have a right to know about your hush money payments. So voters can make good choices in the voting booth.
and we do insist that financial books are truthful.
That's how our rules are set up.
You have a problem with these rules when they constrict right wing power and show you have been conned. I understand. But I'm sure your 'law and order conservative' nature will understand the purpose of the laws and support them.
This post was edited 2 minutes after it was posted.