Fauci knew, he lied to cover it up, he ruined lives, destroyed businesses, life savings and this miserable little troll should be fired and indicted.
Fauci knew, he lied to cover it up, he ruined lives, destroyed businesses, life savings and this miserable little troll should be fired and indicted.
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
So you admit you were wrong about the effects of the parliamentary ruling.
You are also wrong about Sinema. She's not dumb enough to jump onto a sinking ship.
Do you also believe that Trump will be reinstated by August?
I am right. You're going to have a near impossible task to pass the Biden agenda. I said "if" about Sinema, not predicting a certainty. As for Trump being reinstated, I don't see that happening. However, the (upcoming) forensic audits in AZ, GA, WI, PA and possibly in MI will reveal fraud and show the General Election of 2020 was clearly stolen.
You were wrong on the facts about the effects of the parliamentary ruling. HR1 and ProAct were never subject to reconciliation in the first place. So they are unaffected. The infrastructure bill is mostly unaffected because it was probably going to pass as a single piece of legislation anyway.
Passing the Biden agenda was never going to be easy and the ruling does little to help or hurt.
You are wrong about Sinema because the idea that she would become an independent is preposterous. She would stand no chance of being reelected as an independent.
All the upcoming audits will claim fraud. That's what they are designed to do. But they will reveal no actual fraud and only serve as a means to separate Trumpers from their money.
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Fauci knew, he lied to cover it up, he ruined lives, destroyed businesses, life savings and this miserable little troll should be fired and indicted.
Yep, that paragon of journalistic integrity The Gateway Pundit. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
formerly present wrote:
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Fauci knew, he lied to cover it up, he ruined lives, destroyed businesses, life savings and this miserable little troll should be fired and indicted.
Yep, that paragon of journalistic integrity The Gateway Pundit. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
You believed everything CNN/MSNBC/MSM fed you:
Hands up, don't shoot
Russia hoax
Covington kids
Kavanaugh is a rapist
Smollett was assaulted
Russians hacked electric grid in Vermont
Drinking bleach and the feeding koi fish hoaxes
Shall I continue?
Fat hurts wrote:
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
I am right. You're going to have a near impossible task to pass the Biden agenda. I said "if" about Sinema, not predicting a certainty. As for Trump being reinstated, I don't see that happening. However, the (upcoming) forensic audits in AZ, GA, WI, PA and possibly in MI will reveal fraud and show the General Election of 2020 was clearly stolen.
You were wrong on the facts about the effects of the parliamentary ruling. HR1 and ProAct were never subject to reconciliation in the first place. So they are unaffected. The infrastructure bill is mostly unaffected because it was probably going to pass as a single piece of legislation anyway.
Passing the Biden agenda was never going to be easy and the ruling does little to help or hurt.
You are wrong about Sinema because the idea that she would become an independent is preposterous. She would stand no chance of being reelected as an independent.
All the upcoming audits will claim fraud. That's what they are designed to do. But they will reveal no actual fraud and only serve as a means to separate Trumpers from their money.
But he called them "FORENSIC" audits! Don't you understand that that makes all of the difference in the world ?!?! THIS will finally make the difference !!
It's tough, because on the one hand, mocking probably only very rarely changes minds.
On the other hand, it's so hard to do ANYTHING but that with folks who haven't QUITE seen through Trump after 5 or 6 freakin' years.......
Wow, this country is sad.
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
formerly present wrote:
Yep, that paragon of journalistic integrity The Gateway Pundit. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
You believed everything CNN/MSNBC/MSM fed you:
Hands up, don't shoot
Russia hoax
Covington kids
Kavanaugh is a rapist
Smollett was assaulted
Russians hacked electric grid in Vermont
Drinking bleach and the feeding koi fish hoaxes
Shall I continue?
a) Your post does NOTHING to refute your having provided a link to a story from The Gateway Pundit. They have no integrity; if you continue link to them, neither do you.
"Overall, we rate The Gateway Pundit Questionable based on EXTREME right-wing BIAS, promotion of CONSPIRACIES, and NUMEROUS instances of PUBLISHING FALSE (FAKE) NEWS.
[Emphases mine.]
. . .
"The Gateway Pundit has published numerous false or conspiracy stories such as Hillary Clinton having a seizure, identifying an innocent person in the Las Vegas mass shooting, and identifying the wrong person after the motor vehicle homicide at the White Supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia. Further, TGP claimed the 'FBI received tips well in advance of the Florida school shooting and decided, for whatever reason, not to act.' Finally, based on publishing false information, TGP has faced lawsuits for defamation and damages to innocent individuals."
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-gateway-pundit/b) I have never--as in NOT ONCE--watched CNN or MSNBC. People I trust have told me what those channels are about, and it sounds incredibly boring: "Orange man bad!" I'll stick to a variety of sources, including Fox, thanks.
c) FYI I have never--as in NOT ONCE--cast a ballot on the Democratic line for any office in any election, in half a century as a voter. So there's that.
Bottom line: You form your "conclusions" in advance and so you're forced to link to "questionable" (no kidding!) sources to try to support them. Sad.
nonequals wrote:
It's tough, because on the one hand, mocking probably only very rarely changes minds.
On the other hand, it's so hard to do ANYTHING but that with folks who haven't QUITE seen through Trump after 5 or 6 freakin' years.......
Wow, this country is sad.
The faster you realize these loser derangement syndrome inflicted chuds are irretrievably lost the faster you will start calling them what they are - deplorable. There is no middle ground here, and many also deserve to be called grade A a$$holes.
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
formerly present wrote:
Yep, that paragon of journalistic integrity The Gateway Pundit. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
You believed everything CNN/MSNBC/MSM fed you:
Hands up, don't shoot
Russia hoax
Covington kids
Kavanaugh is a rapist
Smollett was assaulted
Russians hacked electric grid in Vermont
Drinking bleach and the feeding koi fish hoaxes
Shall I continue?
You are without a doubt the dumbest poster in letsrun history.
sternocleidomastoid wrote:
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
You believed everything CNN/MSNBC/MSM fed you:
Hands up, don't shoot
Russia hoax
Covington kids
Kavanaugh is a rapist
Smollett was assaulted
Russians hacked electric grid in Vermont
Drinking bleach and the feeding koi fish hoaxes
Shall I continue?
You are without a doubt the dumbest poster in letsrun history.
Wait just one minute, that is a hotly contested title between the trump lovers biff, Sally and ghost/igy. Let’s see:
Biff remained certain until late last year that the election would be overturned. He believed all those ridiculous trump minions and probably emptied his wallet for agent orange. He did however GTFO this thread for good it seems which means he at least figured something out.
Sally is a certified dumba$$ who despite trolling for years and claiming high intelligence has not managed to work out the basics. He tries to use trolling as cover but the outrageous stupidity and extent of the butthurtness from his loss is very visible. He still thinks Gina and I are the same poster for example. Also, despite his claims otherwise, he’s clearly a trump lover to the bone.
Ghost is a stone cold idiot for happily swallowing any Russian and right wing rag propaganda he sees, and not detecting even a hint of the immense hypocrisy in most of his posts. I’ll also throw Igy in the mix as I suspect they might be the same poster. He’s a raging racist on top of it all.
As you can see, it’s a fierce competition.. but I’d have to agree for now, ghost is going above and beyond.
Trump is on the big lie tour according to Brian Williams 😂
https://twitter.com/jackposobiec/status/1400668038777671680?s=21
Gina.... wrote:
A very fit couple.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/bidens-mark-first-ladys-birthday-185100709.html
👏
Yeah, compare that to the disgusting Big Mac guzzling amorphous orange blob that previously occupied the WH.
But but but this can’t be! Even FOX was saying Biden could barely speak on his own and stand up straight! He even tripped on some steps! 🎻🤡
Being a criminal POS is a requirement for Rs holding office
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1400294276735528964?s=21
I know I post a lot, and often about agent orange as unfortunately he’s still very relevant as the head of the GQP. I am happy to stop posting about him, but will only do so and stop throwing salt in the wound when the trump lovers finally admit he lost fair and square.
This here is worth reading as it’s one of the best summaries of fat boy I’ve seen. It’s a series of tweets from Seth Abramson:
1/ One thing I found in writing three bestselling nonfiction books about Donald Trump is that he has a series of methods for violating state and federal laws without getting caught—none of which are *actually* prophylactics against prosecution, they've just functioned that way.
2/ For instance, Trump has his accountants and lawyers commit crimes for him. He shares lawyers with criminals he wants to do business with. He has his lawyers represent and enter defense agreements with anyone who could hurt him. He dangles incentives to witnesses to stay quiet.
3/ He says things so preposterous that no one could think he believes them except the people he wants to act on what he's said. He avoids using email. He uses family members to commit crimes, as he believes they won't betray him. He seeks out already-compromised people as allies.
4/ The list goes on and on. But there's something else Trump does that I never saw a criminal knowingly do across the nearly a decade I represented more than 2,000 accused criminals in three jurisdictions: he commits crimes "in the aggregate," a very confusing and rare concept.
5/ That is, Trump commits a very large number of actions that each could *arguably* be said to be "on the line" of illegality. Now, to be clear, most of these actions *are* criminal. But in a system where prosecutors generally fear investigating the rich, powerful, and famous...
6/ ...Trump creates an incentive for prosecutors to look at *each act separately* and say, "Well, Trump *could* argue in court that..." and thereafter decide that they're not *sure* they could prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, which technically means they can't indict.
7/ Of course, the law doesn't work this way for you or me. It doesn't work this way for anyone who isn't rich, powerful, and famous. For the rest of us, prosecutors consider the *totality* of the actions of a suspect because that's generally how criminal intent is proven, anyway.
8/ It's *defense* attorneys—as I was for years—who are trained to break a case into pieces and attack each piece individually. When a *prosecutor* starts doing this as an excuse not to prosecute? Well, you can be certain that the defendant is rich, famous, powerful, or all three.
9/ So, what does this have to do with my pinned tweet? Well, Trump has found *so many different ways* to violate 18 U.S. Code § 912—which prohibits any person from pretending to be a government official—that a prosecutor scared to prosecute him can explain away (falsely) any one.
10/ But the totality of Trump's actions demonstrates a clear intent to cumulatively—in the aggregate—violate 18 U.S. Code § 912. Essentially, Trump's "scheme" requires repeated small actions, not a single camera-ready "aha!" moment. It's how Trump commits nearly *all* his crimes.
11/ That's why Mueller found a dozen acts of Obstruction by Trump. Why—non-defense lawyers might ask—not just one? Why didn't Trump just make clear *who* he wanted to do *what* in a single statement on a single day? Because Trump's crimes are schemes with small, repeated actions.
12/ Trump kept going back to Comey, McGahn, Manafort and others he wanted to obstruct or tamper with, hoping each time his actions would fall below the threshold for a crime—as no prosecutor would want to put the full picture together. Takes too long and too professionally risky.
13/ Of course it's juries that decide criminal cases—not prosecutors. And is there even one American who doubts that Trump is doing everything he can to appear to be the "legitimate" President of the United States? Does anyone doubt that he's fundraising off this misapprehension?
14/ Here's the relevant federal statute:
15/ In my pinned PROOF article, I also "pre-address" the problem with Legal Twitter that this sort of crime produces—attorneys who value being right over fulfilling their Oath, so they determine what *will* happen and then pretend that it's what *should* happen. In other words...
CONCLUSION/ ...they deduce that, for political reasons, Trump won't be investigated—they may be right—so they fail to demand the law be followed or *even* what I call for here: a cease-and-desist letter from federal authorities. Ignoring Trump's crimes makes him *more* dangerous.
Someone is actually making america great again...
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/06/04/business/global-minimum-tax-g7/index.html
Trollminator wrote:
I know I post a lot, and often about agent orange as unfortunately he’s still very relevant as the head of the GQP. I am happy to stop posting about him, but will only do so and stop throwing salt in the wound when the trump lovers finally admit he lost fair and square.
This here is worth reading as it’s one of the best summaries of fat boy I’ve seen. It’s a series of tweets from Seth Abramson:
1/ One thing I found in writing three bestselling nonfiction books about Donald Trump is that he has a series of methods for violating state and federal laws without getting caught—none of which are *actually* prophylactics against prosecution, they've just functioned that way.
2/ For instance, Trump has his accountants and lawyers commit crimes for him. He shares lawyers with criminals he wants to do business with. He has his lawyers represent and enter defense agreements with anyone who could hurt him. He dangles incentives to witnesses to stay quiet.
3/ He says things so preposterous that no one could think he believes them except the people he wants to act on what he's said. He avoids using email. He uses family members to commit crimes, as he believes they won't betray him. He seeks out already-compromised people as allies.
4/ The list goes on and on. But there's something else Trump does that I never saw a criminal knowingly do across the nearly a decade I represented more than 2,000 accused criminals in three jurisdictions: he commits crimes "in the aggregate," a very confusing and rare concept.
5/ That is, Trump commits a very large number of actions that each could *arguably* be said to be "on the line" of illegality. Now, to be clear, most of these actions *are* criminal. But in a system where prosecutors generally fear investigating the rich, powerful, and famous...
6/ ...Trump creates an incentive for prosecutors to look at *each act separately* and say, "Well, Trump *could* argue in court that..." and thereafter decide that they're not *sure* they could prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, which technically means they can't indict.
7/ Of course, the law doesn't work this way for you or me. It doesn't work this way for anyone who isn't rich, powerful, and famous. For the rest of us, prosecutors consider the *totality* of the actions of a suspect because that's generally how criminal intent is proven, anyway.
8/ It's *defense* attorneys—as I was for years—who are trained to break a case into pieces and attack each piece individually. When a *prosecutor* starts doing this as an excuse not to prosecute? Well, you can be certain that the defendant is rich, famous, powerful, or all three.
9/ So, what does this have to do with my pinned tweet? Well, Trump has found *so many different ways* to violate 18 U.S. Code § 912—which prohibits any person from pretending to be a government official—that a prosecutor scared to prosecute him can explain away (falsely) any one.
10/ But the totality of Trump's actions demonstrates a clear intent to cumulatively—in the aggregate—violate 18 U.S. Code § 912. Essentially, Trump's "scheme" requires repeated small actions, not a single camera-ready "aha!" moment. It's how Trump commits nearly *all* his crimes.
11/ That's why Mueller found a dozen acts of Obstruction by Trump. Why—non-defense lawyers might ask—not just one? Why didn't Trump just make clear *who* he wanted to do *what* in a single statement on a single day? Because Trump's crimes are schemes with small, repeated actions.
12/ Trump kept going back to Comey, McGahn, Manafort and others he wanted to obstruct or tamper with, hoping each time his actions would fall below the threshold for a crime—as no prosecutor would want to put the full picture together. Takes too long and too professionally risky.
13/ Of course it's juries that decide criminal cases—not prosecutors. And is there even one American who doubts that Trump is doing everything he can to appear to be the "legitimate" President of the United States? Does anyone doubt that he's fundraising off this misapprehension?
14/ Here's the relevant federal statute:
15/ In my pinned PROOF article, I also "pre-address" the problem with Legal Twitter that this sort of crime produces—attorneys who value being right over fulfilling their Oath, so they determine what *will* happen and then pretend that it's what *should* happen. In other words...
CONCLUSION/ ...they deduce that, for political reasons, Trump won't be investigated—they may be right—so they fail to demand the law be followed or *even* what I call for here: a cease-and-desist letter from federal authorities. Ignoring Trump's crimes makes him *more* dangerous.
You guys are 0-5 against Trump. 200 points below the Mendoza line. Time to give it up. He keeps humiliating you guys.
Trollminator wrote:
Gina.... wrote:
A very fit couple.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/bidens-mark-first-ladys-birthday-185100709.html👏
Yeah, compare that to the disgusting Big Mac guzzling amorphous orange blob that previously occupied the WH.
But but but this can’t be! Even FOX was saying Biden could barely speak on his own and stand up straight! He even tripped on some steps! 🎻🤡
To call Biden a scoundrel would be a huge understatement.
https://www.businessinsider.com/joe-biden-allegations-women-2020-campaign-2019-6