To all you conspiracy theorists, trumpers'...you just can't fix stupid.
This thread was deleted by a volunteer moderator. I certainly don't want a thread this big deleted so I've restored. THat being said, this thread has served it's purpose. I've closed it to new posts.
We have a new 2024 vaccine thread here. New people don't need to try to wade through 20,000 posts to figure out what is going on.
-
33
-
What age, Dr. Jha ? 50 or 65 ?
Please clarify in the unlikely event that anyone will pay attention.
*******
“If you’re over 50, certainly if you’re over 65, you’ve got to go get these vaccines because it actually, literally could save your life. It’s a difference between life and death,” Jha said during an interview with Yahoo Finance.
24 -
DanM wrote:
What age, Dr. Jha ? 50 or 65 ?
Please clarify in the unlikely event that anyone will pay attention.
*******
“If you’re over 50, certainly if you’re over 65, you’ve got to go get these vaccines because it actually, literally could save your life. It’s a difference between life and death,” Jha said during an interview with Yahoo Finance.
Is anyone still listening to these liars?
54 -
my 2c wrote:
Alex Jones Was Right wrote:
"Cimate Change" is another Hoax, but climate(geo)-engineering is real.
Come on, don't you think you're laying it on a bit too thick? I appreciate your commitment to your art, but I think even the anti-vaxxers are going to catch on to how you're parodying them and making them all look like complete nutcases. What's next, lizard people?
You removed from my quote the link to Yale.edu discussing the reality of geo-engineering, also avoided the Biden research/funding/policies for dimming the sun in my other reply on the topic, then you do the usual Leftist gaslighting with the "lizard people." In 2022, "Climate Change" is just a political agenda pretending to be a theory, whereas geo-engineering is existing tech already in use (usually on the pretext of fighting "Climate Change")
Harvard, taking carbon dioxide (what plants crave) out of the air, lower crop yields, less food, more starvation = depopulation:
If you can't see through one hoax, then you're likely to fall for others pushed by the same people, groups, and governments.
34 -
14.1 Million doses destroyed in a country of 8.6 Million.
We have been fed lies about uptake. There is no way that two-thirds of humanity has taken at least one dose of Covid "vaccine".
*********
"Switzerland will destroy 9 million doses of Moderna (MRNA.O) COVID-19 vaccine that have reached their expiry date, with another 5.1 million vaccine jabs set to meet the same fate by February, the government said on Wednesday."
34 -
uhhhh... wrote:
antivaxxers killing democracy - - - - - - wrote:
Let us know when antivaxxers’ baseless claims and lazy trolling/gaslighting about vaccine induced deaths have actual evidence behind them. We’ll be waiting a while, I still see no evidence that antivaxxers know what credible evidence or proving information for accuracy and legitimacy actually means 🤡
you and 2600bro as well.
the board looks forward to hearing the results of your d-dimer tests.
Someone learned a new word recently!
34 -
Alex Jones Was Right wrote:
my 2c wrote:
Come on, don't you think you're laying it on a bit too thick? I appreciate your commitment to your art, but I think even the anti-vaxxers are going to catch on to how you're parodying them and making them all look like complete nutcases. What's next, lizard people?
You removed from my quote the link to Yale.edu discussing the reality of geo-engineering, also avoided the Biden research/funding/policies for dimming the sun in my other reply on the topic, then you do the usual Leftist gaslighting with the "lizard people." In 2022, "Climate Change" is just a political agenda pretending to be a theory, whereas geo-engineering is existing tech already in use (usually on the pretext of fighting "Climate Change")
Harvard, taking carbon dioxide (what plants crave) out of the air, lower crop yields, less food, more starvation = depopulation:
If you can't see through one hoax, then you're likely to fall for others pushed by the same people, groups, and governments.
This is meaningless without a detailed explanation of the effect on frogs' sexuality.
35 -
In light of the recent data that COVID is causing still births, especially in unvaxxed mothers... antivaxxers are still lying and babbling.
They have no shame.
47 -
What I mean is that there is obviously a strong correlation between dose number and adverse outcome. However, one could try to dismiss this by suggesting that the weakest (with the most comorbidities and/or already on death's doorstep) are also the most likely to be jabbed. I say fine, if this is a valid explanation then at the very least, the jab does not appear to be working at improving their outcomes either, does it? In other words, it doesn't work for those that need it and no one else needs it!
24 -
Alex Jones Was Right wrote:
What I mean is that there is obviously a strong correlation between dose number and adverse outcome. However, one could try to dismiss this by suggesting that the weakest (with the most comorbidities and/or already on death's doorstep) are also the most likely to be jabbed. I say fine, if this is a valid explanation then at the very least, the jab does not appear to be working at improving their outcomes either, does it? In other words, it doesn't work for those that need it and no one else needs it!
Base rate fallacy
43 -
Quarter 3 of 2021 saw excess mortality accelerate to 84% for 25-44 year olds.
Check out the report from the Society of Actuaries for insurance group life policies. They don't play politics, just raw, undisputed data.
Prior to this anomaly, this age bracket historically experienced far less mortality than the general population.
There is only one logical explanation for this if you understand the temporal association.
01 -
A man walks into a shop that sells brains, he walks up to the shop assistant and says 'I hope you can help me, I'd like to buy a new brain".
The shop assistants responds "no problem, here are some of our brains we have on sale"
"Here's the brain of a scientist, 5 dollars."
"Here's our second special deal for today. The brain of an anti-vaxxer, 20,000 dollars".
The man, completely perplexed, asks "Why is the brain of an anti-vaxxer more expensive than of a scientist?"
"Because it's never been used" The shop assistant replies.34 -
uhhhh... wrote:
Quarter 3 of 2021 saw excess mortality accelerate to 84% for 25-44 year olds.
Check out the report from the Society of Actuaries for insurance group life policies. They don't play politics, just raw, undisputed data.
Prior to this anomaly, this age bracket historically experienced far less mortality than the general population.
There is only one logical explanation for this if you understand the temporal association.
Yes, the Delta wave which hit younger populations FAR more than earlier COVID waves.
You can see it here:It's pretty easy to double deaths when only ~2,500 25-45 year olds are dying a week in the US.
The increase in excess deaths correlates perfectly with the Delta wave. Excellent insight you've made there.
33 -
antivaxxers killing democracy - - - - - - - wrote:
A man walks into a shop that sells brains, he walks up to the shop assistant and says 'I hope you can help me, I'd like to buy a new brain".
The shop assistants responds "no problem, here are some of our brains we have on sale"
"Here's the brain of a scientist, 5 dollars."
"Here's our second special deal for today. The brain of an anti-vaxxer, 20,000 dollars".
The man, completely perplexed, asks "Why is the brain of an anti-vaxxer more expensive than of a scientist?"
"Because it's never been used" The shop assistant replies.I lol'd
43 -
uhhhh... wrote:
Quarter 3 of 2021 saw excess mortality accelerate to 84% for 25-44 year olds.
Check out the report from the Society of Actuaries for insurance group life policies. They don't play politics, just raw, undisputed data.
Prior to this anomaly, this age bracket historically experienced far less mortality than the general population.
There is only one logical explanation for this if you understand the temporal association.
Let's see:
"Temporal association between two disorders or clinical problems refers to their hypothesized relationship in terms of time of onset, most often inferring a causal or contributory relationship."So Quarter 3 saw an anomaly in rising mortality rates in 25-44 year olds. Vaccines were introduced in January 2021 and by September over 65% of the US adult population had been vaccinated.
So if we're looking for a hypothetical cause it could either be, according to the pro jab shills, that age group were mostly unvaccinated and died from complications of Covid, the anti vaxxers would say they were vaccinated and died from the complications of the vaccine.
I supposed it could be a little of both but we'd need more data to figure out if other mortality causes belonged to either the shills or anti-vaxxers' camp. Like did the suicide rate for that age group happen as a result of being locked up, isolated, unemployed, vaxxed, or unvaxxed? Whom to blame?
20 -
Jefe in the CO wrote:
uhhhh... wrote:
Quarter 3 of 2021 saw excess mortality accelerate to 84% for 25-44 year olds.
Check out the report from the Society of Actuaries for insurance group life policies. They don't play politics, just raw, undisputed data.
Prior to this anomaly, this age bracket historically experienced far less mortality than the general population.
There is only one logical explanation for this if you understand the temporal association.
Let's see:
"Temporal association between two disorders or clinical problems refers to their hypothesized relationship in terms of time of onset, most often inferring a causal or contributory relationship."So Quarter 3 saw an anomaly in rising mortality rates in 25-44 year olds. Vaccines were introduced in January 2021 and by September over 65% of the US adult population had been vaccinated.
So if we're looking for a hypothetical cause it could either be, according to the pro jab shills, that age group were mostly unvaccinated and died from complications of Covid, the anti vaxxers would say they were vaccinated and died from the complications of the vaccine.
I supposed it could be a little of both but we'd need more data to figure out if other mortality causes belonged to either the shills or anti-vaxxers' camp. Like did the suicide rate for that age group happen as a result of being locked up, isolated, unemployed, vaxxed, or unvaxxed? Whom to blame?
Did not see these increases in 2020 during Covid and before the jab.
24 -
Jefe in the CO wrote:
uhhhh... wrote:
Quarter 3 of 2021 saw excess mortality accelerate to 84% for 25-44 year olds.
Check out the report from the Society of Actuaries for insurance group life policies. They don't play politics, just raw, undisputed data.
Prior to this anomaly, this age bracket historically experienced far less mortality than the general population.
There is only one logical explanation for this if you understand the temporal association.
Let's see:
"Temporal association between two disorders or clinical problems refers to their hypothesized relationship in terms of time of onset, most often inferring a causal or contributory relationship."So Quarter 3 saw an anomaly in rising mortality rates in 25-44 year olds. Vaccines were introduced in January 2021 and by September over 65% of the US adult population had been vaccinated.
So if we're looking for a hypothetical cause it could either be, according to the pro jab shills, that age group were mostly unvaccinated and died from complications of Covid, the anti vaxxers would say they were vaccinated and died from the complications of the vaccine.
I supposed it could be a little of both but we'd need more data to figure out if other mortality causes belonged to either the shills or anti-vaxxers' camp. Like did the suicide rate for that age group happen as a result of being locked up, isolated, unemployed, vaxxed, or unvaxxed? Whom to blame?
It's obviously the Delta wave. There were tons are data and articles showing that the Delta wave was hitting much younger slices of the pop than earlier waves. You had to be living under a rock to miss it then. I guess that is believable for these anti-vaxx troglodytes, quivering in fear all day long.
32 -
American hero for resisting the Covid Hoax and the masking fraud:
The image reading "will not provide any protection against COVID-19 (coronavirus)" is real. Most masks, if not all, being sold have some sort of label saying that it will not provide any protection against viruses, but that does not mean masks should not be worn. [blah, blah, blah, the CDC's lies to create the fear to justify lockdowns and push the "vaccines"]
13 -
Alex Jones Was Right wrote:
American hero for resisting the Covid Hoax and the masking fraud:
The image reading "will not provide any protection against COVID-19 (coronavirus)" is real. Most masks, if not all, being sold have some sort of label saying that it will not provide any protection against viruses, but that does not mean masks should not be worn. [blah, blah, blah, the CDC's lies to create the fear to justify lockdowns and push the "vaccines"]
But what about the frogs and space lasers
21 -
You literally did exactly what he said. Ignore very real things and mention some stupid fringe thing. You are a dishonest person
10
/cloudfront-us-east-2.images.arcpublishing.com/reuters/TFL7EZY6HFL45DDKYNHCWW6NVI.jpg)
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.