Serious thread about election fraud

pass the pretzels wrote:

I went to the election maps - current and 2016 - and drilled down to the counties. I picked Maricopa because the Trumps kept saying "wait until Maricopa reports" meaning that they expected good results there.

The TV pundits said the turnout in the suburbs was exceptionally high and primarily independents & swing voters. They also said 2018 showed it becoming more and more democratic. I have not researched it so I can't verify this.

I do know that Trump smeared milatry service members and in particular, John McCain, Arizona's hero. That alone probably cost him a large chunk of votes. Then McCain's wife endorsed Joe Biden, denounced Trump, and and publically called him out for just being who he is. Trump responded by trashing McCain again and this time added his widow and children to the barrage. That probably explains Maricopa County Arizona.

Why aren't Trump voters questioning Florida, Texas, North Carolina, Ohio,.....?

Good point George. Let's take a look at those states also. All fraud needs to be exposed.

11,000 sworn affidavits. In case you don't know how affidavits work, if you're caught to be lying or spread mistruths, you're likely to face perjury charges. No guys, keep listening to the MSM who just keeps repeating "no evidence of voter fraud, nothing to see here" until all the mindless sheep believes it's true.

Thot Police wrote:

https://www.newsweek.com/rnc-chair-says-11000-people-have-come-forward-voter-fraud-claims-1546546

11,000 sworn affidavits. In case you don't know how affidavits work, if you're caught to be lying or spread mistruths, you're likely to face perjury charges. No guys, keep listening to the MSM who just keeps repeating "no evidence of voter fraud, nothing to see here" until all the mindless sheep believes it's true.

500 sworn affidavits. You can't even read.

Just checking in to see if this thread ever got serious.

Thot Police wrote:

https://www.newsweek.com/rnc-chair-says-11000-people-have-come-forward-voter-fraud-claims-1546546

11,000 sworn affidavits. In case you don't know how affidavits work, if you're caught to be lying or spread mistruths, you're likely to face perjury charges. No guys, keep listening to the MSM who just keeps repeating "no evidence of voter fraud, nothing to see here" until all the mindless sheep believes it's true.

You know all these claims are just 'I saw some guy do something a bit shady with a piece of paper' and things like that.

These are not genuine claims of voter fraud, it's just desperate cult members.

The vast majority will be tenuous, and nothing will come of them, but vague enough that they also can't prove that they're lying.

Agingrunner wrote:

george c wrote:

I do know that Trump smeared milatry service members and in particular, John McCain, Arizona's hero. That alone probably cost him a large chunk of votes. Then McCain's wife endorsed Joe Biden, denounced Trump, and and publically called him out for just being who he is. Trump responded by trashing McCain again and this time added his widow and children to the barrage. That probably explains Maricopa County Arizona.

Why aren't Trump voters questioning Florida, Texas, North Carolina, Ohio,.....?

Good point George. Let's take a look at those states also. All fraud needs to be exposed.

I agree. I am not sure why anyone on either side would not support investigations into fraud. That said, i am not sure why 4 different bipartisan Election Security bills passed by the house were blocked from a vote by McConnell. Had they passed, some of this stuff might automatically be in place and not take lawsuits to pursuing transparency. What I have read, Trump's lawsuits have been dismissed because they addressed silly things like state laws accepting ballots that were mailed by 11/3. Pursue meaningful questions and they will have more meat.

Here's a video interview of a Democrat city councilman (also black, for those who want to accuse him of being a white supremacist Trump supporter) coming forward with his statements.

For those who like to spout of "no evidence of voter fraud" don't seem to understand what evidence is. There is no evidence until there is an investigation, that's why MSM can get away with saying "no evidence of voter fraud"

trollism wrote:

Thot Police wrote:

https://www.newsweek.com/rnc-chair-says-11000-people-have-come-forward-voter-fraud-claims-1546546

11,000 sworn affidavits. In case you don't know how affidavits work, if you're caught to be lying or spread mistruths, you're likely to face perjury charges. No guys, keep listening to the MSM who just keeps repeating "no evidence of voter fraud, nothing to see here" until all the mindless sheep believes it's true.

You know all these claims are just 'I saw some guy do something a bit shady with a piece of paper' and things like that.

These are not genuine claims of voter fraud, it's just desperate cult members.

The vast majority will be tenuous, and nothing will come of them, but vague enough that they also can't prove that they're lying.

I just posted a video of a democrat city councilman that found dead voter's ballots - is he a desperate cult member? I'm glad you've already gone through all 11,000 allegations and verified if they're true in less than a week.

Unless....you're just saying dismissing all allegations before an investigation is done because you don't want to admit there's a possibility that the guy you like committed fraud, because we all know people never lie to benefit themselves or their groups. I'm going to go with the latter.

Thot Police wrote:

https://nationalfile.com/video-massive-democrat-voter-fraud-busted-by-former-houston-city-councilman/

Here's a video interview of a Democrat city councilman (also black, for those who want to accuse him of being a white supremacist Trump supporter) coming forward with his statements.

For those who like to spout of "no evidence of voter fraud" don't seem to understand what evidence is. There is no evidence until there is an investigation, that's why MSM can get away with saying "no evidence of voter fraud"

Bro you were off on your sworn affidavits by a factor of 2200%.

local lib wrote:

Thot Police wrote:

https://www.newsweek.com/rnc-chair-says-11000-people-have-come-forward-voter-fraud-claims-1546546

11,000 sworn affidavits. In case you don't know how affidavits work, if you're caught to be lying or spread mistruths, you're likely to face perjury charges. No guys, keep listening to the MSM who just keeps repeating "no evidence of voter fraud, nothing to see here" until all the mindless sheep believes it's true.

500 sworn affidavits. You can't even read.

Oh I'm sorry... ONLY 500 sworn affidavits. You're right, nothing to see here.

the beagle wrote:

Thot Police wrote:

https://nationalfile.com/video-massive-democrat-voter-fraud-busted-by-former-houston-city-councilman/

Here's a video interview of a Democrat city councilman (also black, for those who want to accuse him of being a white supremacist Trump supporter) coming forward with his statements.

For those who like to spout of "no evidence of voter fraud" don't seem to understand what evidence is. There is no evidence until there is an investigation, that's why MSM can get away with saying "no evidence of voter fraud"

Bro you were off on your sworn affidavits by a factor of 2200%.

11,000 allegations in 500 sworn affidavits. Nothing to see here, you're right. No reason for investigation, move along.

Thot Police wrote:

the beagle wrote:

Bro you were off on your sworn affidavits by a factor of 2200%.

11,000 allegations in 500 sworn affidavits. Nothing to see here, you're right. No reason for investigation, move along.

Never said that there is nothing worth looking into - I was explaining how you just lost your credibility. These are not mutually exclusive.

the beagle wrote:

Thot Police wrote:

11,000 allegations in 500 sworn affidavits. Nothing to see here, you're right. No reason for investigation, move along.

Never said that there is nothing worth looking into - I was explaining how you just lost your credibility. These are not mutually exclusive.

Ah I'm so sorry - let me try and get back into your good graces and restore honor into the Thot Police name. It was 11,000 allegations made in 500 sworn affidavits.

Thot Police wrote:

Ah I'm so sorry - let me try and get back into your good graces and restore honor into the Thot Police name. It was 11,000 allegations made in 500 sworn affidavits.

Yes, we all know. It was right there in the synopsis of the article you posted.

We all saw it, but somehow you didn't.

Sorry, you have not regained your credibility. It remains at zero.

Nice dodge. Does he have less credibility than a guy that goes by Trollism?

libster wrote:

Serious question time -

The internet including this thread is ablaze with allegations & evidence.

The truth is that none of us can verify any of the claims here. So I’m at the point where I’m assuming the best & credible evidence will end up in court, and anything else was weak or misinformation. Fair? I’m not sure how else I’m supposed to sort through it.

The question then is - if the trend continues where all of Trump’s lawsuits are unsuccessful, will that be enough to satisfy the conservatives who presently believe there was fraud? If not - is it possible to convince you, what would it take?

Any response to this?