Oddly enough, nobody else on this thread was so stup!d that they were unable to understand Nnonequal's post. You are the only one on this thread with a sufficient level of stup!dity. There is really no way around this fact.
I honestly don't recall: Was it TAITR or Newname who used to criticize others for not understanding hyperbole?
90% then 97%, then 98% in just afew posts. Wow, it is getting better by the second!
Most people don't care enough to vote until their mid 20s, then voting percentage goes up each decade. It makes a good story that all mail in ballots are fraud, but
1) Voter turnout only increases by about 4% average when states send mail in ballots to every registered voter an there is no evidence of favoring one party
2) There is no proof of widespread mal in vote fraud has been shown by the many investigations and court filings, despite orange man and my pillow guy's assertions [AZ investigator found MORE Biden votes],
3) 2020 D vs R voting percentages were historically normal. Trump specifically told his supporters to vote in person as his USPS appointee was dismantling mail sorting machines, yet still in person voting was down, but with normal voter distribution.
But among would-be criminals, it's basically 0%. Source: just trust agip
Let's look at the big picture:
1) Chances that Agip is correct about most inner-city criminals of the type you Trumpers are talking about being responsible citizens of a democracy and regularly voting (for those evil libs): Extremely high.
2) Chances that lots of Trump's inner circle are convicted criminals? 100%.
3) Chances that lots of the Neanderthals who did his bidding 6 Jan are criminals? 100%.
4) Chances that Trump is a criminal? 100%.
5) Chances that #4 will be proven? We'll see.
6) Chances that this "conversation" with the Trumpers is worth having? 0.00%.
But among would-be criminals, it's basically 0%. Source: just trust agip
Let's look at the big picture:
1) Chances that Agip is correct about most inner-city criminals of the type you Trumpers are talking about being responsible citizens of a democracy and regularly voting (for those evil libs): Extremely high.
2) Chances that lots of Trump's inner circle are convicted criminals? 100%.
3) Chances that lots of the Neanderthals who did his bidding 6 Jan are criminals? 100%.
4) Chances that Trump is a criminal? 100%.
5) Chances that #4 will be proven? We'll see.
6) Chances that this "conversation" with the Trumpers is worth having? 0.00%.
I'd add
7) Chances that one of Trump's big accomplishments, his business, was built on fraud: 100% and proven already.
This post was edited 27 seconds after it was posted.
Oddly enough, nobody else on this thread was so stup!d that they were unable to understand Nnonequal's post. You are the only one on this thread with a sufficient level of stup!dity. There is really no way around this fact.
I honestly don't recall: Was it TAITR or Newname who used to criticize others for not understanding hyperbole?
And just to be clear, I wasn't actually engaging in hyperbole when I said (however unclearly) that I'd vote for 99+% of other human beings over Trump. That's not an exaggeration. I think that he's that rarely flawed.
In fact, it's fascinating. While Donald Trump might not have ever killed anyone, I can imagine LOTS of murderers being better presidents. For example (and you can go on all day), would MOST murderers have handled COVID better? Absolutely. Not kissed up to dictators? Yep. Not tried to steal an election? Yep. Not treated the very most sensitive of government documents as cute keepsakes (and perhaps worse)? Yep. And on.......
Okay, let's not have you have it both ways: You want others to recognize hyperbole, you're going to have to recognize it yourself.
You're so dishonest.
Never once have I used hyperbole and then went on a self-righteous rant about reading comprehension the way the stolen valor dip sh*t did when someone called me out on it.
Hey a**wipe, dipsh** is my latest pet name for sometimes-lovable Sally. Don't put your truly filthy hands on it.
Do you still have nightmares about how the Army didn't even want you to make E5?
I honestly don't recall: Was it TAITR or Newname who used to criticize others for not understanding hyperbole?
And just to be clear, I wasn't actually engaging in hyperbole when I said (however unclearly) that I'd vote for 99+% of other human beings over Trump. That's not an exaggeration. I think that he's that rarely flawed.
In fact, it's fascinating. While Donald Trump might not have ever killed anyone, I can imagine LOTS of murderers being better presidents. For example (and you can go on all day), would MOST murderers have handled COVID better? Absolutely. Not kissed up to dictators? Yep. Not tried to steal an election? Yep. Not treated the very most sensitive of government documents as cute keepsakes (and perhaps worse)? Yep. And on.......
Oh, and here's what might be one of the more interesting ones: Who's sexually assaulted more women, Trump or the average murderer?
My money JUST might be on the guy who said QUITE clearly (accurately paraphrasing): FOR BETTER or worse, men have been able to abuse women for eons."
And just to be clear, I wasn't actually engaging in hyperbole when I said (however unclearly) that I'd vote for 99+% of other human beings over Trump. That's not an exaggeration. I think that he's that rarely flawed.
In fact, it's fascinating. While Donald Trump might not have ever killed anyone, I can imagine LOTS of murderers being better presidents. For example (and you can go on all day), would MOST murderers have handled COVID better? Absolutely. Not kissed up to dictators? Yep. Not tried to steal an election? Yep. Not treated the very most sensitive of government documents as cute keepsakes (and perhaps worse)? Yep. And on.......
Oh, and here's what might be one of the more interesting ones: Who's sexually assaulted more women, Trump or the average murderer?
My money JUST might be on the guy who said QUITE clearly (accurately paraphrasing): FOR BETTER or worse, men have been able to abuse women for eons."
Yep, make him POTUS again !!
The exact language. Since I know that the Trumpers want to be maximally informed about their hero:
KAPLAN: And you say – and again this has become very famous – in this video, ‘“I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the p*ssy. You can do anything.” That’s what you said. Correct? TRUMP: Well, historically, that’s true with stars. KAPLAN: It’s true with stars that they can grab women by the p*ssy? TRUMP: Well, that’s what, if you look over the last million years I guess that’s been largely true. Not always, but largely true. Unfortunately or fortunately.
Adolt's reaction to that quote: "So? Where's the bad part?"
Oh, and here's what might be one of the more interesting ones: Who's sexually assaulted more women, Trump or the average murderer?
My money JUST might be on the guy who said QUITE clearly (accurately paraphrasing): FOR BETTER or worse, men have been able to abuse women for eons."
Yep, make him POTUS again !!
The exact language. Since I know that the Trumpers want to be maximally informed about their hero:
KAPLAN: And you say – and again this has become very famous – in this video, ‘“I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the p*ssy. You can do anything.” That’s what you said. Correct? TRUMP: Well, historically, that’s true with stars. KAPLAN: It’s true with stars that they can grab women by the p*ssy? TRUMP: Well, that’s what, if you look over the last million years I guess that’s been largely true. Not always, but largely true. Unfortunately or fortunately.
Adolt's reaction to that quote: "So? Where's the bad part?"
Last but not least, the guy's a freakin' biological anthropology expert! A MILLION years? Who the f*** knew?! Thanks, Don!!
Adolt: "Biological anthropology" is basically "olden days stuff." Like REALLY olden days. Like cavemen, and sh**. And sure, if you want, throw in dinosaurs (in fact, please do).
1) Chances that Agip is correct about most inner-city criminals of the type you Trumpers are talking about being responsible citizens of a democracy and regularly voting (for those evil libs): Extremely high.
2) Chances that lots of Trump's inner circle are convicted criminals? 100%.
3) Chances that lots of the Neanderthals who did his bidding 6 Jan are criminals? 100%.
4) Chances that Trump is a criminal? 100%.
5) Chances that #4 will be proven? We'll see.
6) Chances that this "conversation" with the Trumpers is worth having? 0.00%.
I'd add
7) Chances that one of Trump's big accomplishments, his business, was built on fraud: 100% and proven already.
Chance that Nnnonequals and Agip know how to use "proven" and "proved." 0%
Oh, and here's what might be one of the more interesting ones: Who's sexually assaulted more women, Trump or the average murderer?
My money JUST might be on the guy who said QUITE clearly (accurately paraphrasing): FOR BETTER or worse, men have been able to abuse women for eons."
Yep, make him POTUS again !!
The exact language. Since I know that the Trumpers want to be maximally informed about their hero:
KAPLAN: And you say – and again this has become very famous – in this video, ‘“I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the p*ssy. You can do anything.” That’s what you said. Correct? TRUMP: Well, historically, that’s true with stars. KAPLAN: It’s true with stars that they can grab women by the p*ssy? TRUMP: Well, that’s what, if you look over the last million years I guess that’s been largely true. Not always, but largely true. Unfortunately or fortunately.
Adolt's reaction to that quote: "So? Where's the bad part?"
have to be careful here...a certain type of woman who hangs out around celebrity slimeballs like trump mostly do let stars do whatever they want. It's a self-selected group of starstruck social climbing women. Being grabbed is sort of their goal. Why do you think so many men joined rock bands back in the day?
Anyway, that's who trump is talking about here.
This post was edited 32 seconds after it was posted.
I provided links with real numbers. You countered with made up values and vague conspiracy theories once again. Historical percentages of D vs. R did not change, yet trumpers claim widespread fraud for which they cannot provide any actual evidence. Investigations have proven Biden won and they were funded and run by.... Republicans!
Oh I see what's happening here. You're just really stupid.
How do you prove that a mail in ballot was or wasn't fraudulent when there's no requirement for signature matching?
Do you realize that in many states an ID is not required to vote in person? Since most Trump voters voted in person, any Trump voter that did not show ID must be fraudulent. No proof needed! See how weak that is? Yet, this is your argument.
🚨BREAKING: The House Oversight Committee has uncovered evidence that Joe Biden received a recurring payment of $1,380 from his son Hunter’s law firm beginning in 2018, shortly after a bank money laundering officer warned that the same account was receiving millions of dollars in… pic.twitter.com/lqtiZ8ge0T
Okay--and? The article (even assuming the reporting is accurate--unfortunately, not a given with ZeroHedge), says that this happened while JRB was a private citizen.
Okay--and? The article (even assuming the reporting is accurate--unfortunately, not a given with ZeroHedge), says that this happened while JRB was a private citizen.
Great point because politicians can participate in any crimes they want when they're between terms in office. That's why Democrats don't care about what private citizen Donald Trump does.
Okay--and? The article (even assuming the reporting is accurate--unfortunately, not a given with ZeroHedge), says that this happened while JRB was a private citizen.
Great point because politicians can participate in any crimes they want when they're between terms in office. That's why Democrats don't care about what private citizen Donald Trump does.
the better point is that loaning family members money and then getting paid back is not a crime in any way and especially not an impeachable offense.
This is all documented on the other side. Joe loaned money out to family members...it came back later, interest free apparently.
