USA Basketball Player Stephen Curry (Golden State, California) doesn't think that USA Astronauts ever landed on Earth's Moon

Too many Details, the Lies win in the end wrote:

From the video, we already apparently see that the hammer + feather BOTH take no more than 1.1 seconds (27 frames to be generous) to "fall" from height to surface.

On YouTube you can step frame by frame and get a better count (about 38 frames).

You Can Always Fiddle the Numbers wrote:

Videographer wrote:

Someone else can pick holes in all the other stuff you've posted, but have you allowed for the fact that maybe the video isn't rolling at real time speed?

Sure, NASA decided to speed up the tape by 1.5x (or 1.33x) and just for the "drop" segment of hammer + feather. The rest of the video looks enough to natural speed. And WHY would they post a video at not real time speed in the first place?? Just to troll the so-called "Hoax" auditors?!

NASA didn't decide anything, lots of things can effect why a video would not roll in real time.

"The rest of the video looks enough to natural speed." - How would you know?

You do the Math wrote:

THere is no listed human-data on NASA concerning "Dave Scott" (if real name)

Please tell me you're trolling, otherwise it means you're an idiot.

Try Googling:

dave scott nasa

how tall is dave scott astronaut

dave scott astronaut

Dr No wrote:

Too many Details, the Lies win in the end wrote:

From the video, we already apparently see that the hammer + feather BOTH take no more than 1.1 seconds (27 frames to be generous) to "fall" from height to surface.

On YouTube you can step frame by frame and get a better count (about 38 frames).

Via technology (watchframebyframe), here's an actual count.

Starting at 59.47s is earliest the USA astronaut's hands appear to start to move. Next frame makes is unsure whether this was the release (unlikely IMO).

Clear release is only by 59.62s. More probably time IMO is 59.55s ish. (also accounting for some difficult of starting at velocity exactly zero with bulky suits)

Hitting at between 1:00.70 and 1:00.74s, for at most 1.25 seconds, likely closer to 1.15 range as stated.

But OK, even with the over-estimate of 1.25s, we find that the hammer and feather travelled 1.276 meters, much noticeably less than shoulder height of a tall person wearing boots. Even at 1.3s you'd have to think he was either short or holding the instruments low.

Please tell me you're trolling. wrote:

Try Googling:

dave scott nasa

how tall is dave scott astronaut

dave scott astronaut

Google is in league with world governments, hard to trust their search results.

Anyway, DuckDuckGo responds with information about Dave Scott, including that he made $600000 from selling off "relics" (joystick controller) of his purported space journeys, but nothing about his height - the crucial factor in our hammer/feather hoax analysis. But we KNOW Neil Armstrong (5'11" or 1.80m) how tall was, and Dave Scott is clearly taller in official Gemini pictures. That gives an effective lower limit on his approximate shoulder height, especially when you take space boots into account.

The LM looks like a cheap model built out of cardboard, curtain rods and gold tape.

OneGiantLie

https://youtu.be/s6vAiyUIQog

Here's the Actual Science

humans can run a lot faster in lunar gravity than anyone ever expected.

So why were NASA’s theoretical calculations off-base?

When you don't put the "theory" to a practical test, unsurprisingly you miss the boat by a mile, even if you "pass down" your so-called knowledge for multiple generations to eager USA youths.

With 2014 Orion mission, they re-admitted the radiation was a problem, which they conveniently occluded 1969-72 from their theoretical constructs (contradicting the 1959 science evidence of/c).

They are still pressuring Steph.

We need to STAND WITH HIM!

https://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/warriors-steph-curry-talked-to-a-retired-astronaut-about-his-moon-landing-comments/

This so-called "astronaut" Scott Kelly just shows his ignorance with Steph, comparing other "hoaxes" to NASA's baloney. And he is WRONG that the lunar NBA 3-point line would be 142 feet away, because that is *ONLY* the gravity effect (6x), while the REAL difficulty in hitting a "3-pointer" is in muscular precision (anyone can chuck the ball that far, as a shot put). This would ITSELF change under the lunar conditions (if we ever get a moon there to experiment). And that's just as a preliminary observation. (Other details are how balls travel in Earth's Moon's vacuum)

So, simply because you can hurl the ball 6 times further due to fewer gravity, that DOESN'T MEAN you can SHOOT it with any accuracy at this longer distance!!!

An amateur's error. What one expects from NASA.

For a hoax to persist five years, no more than 2,521 people can be active participants: that is, be aware that the conspiracy exists. To last 25 years, that number drops to 502. And to last a century: 125 people tops.

Of course, the idiot investigator claims ALL 411000 NASA employees would "need to be involved", but reality says it's closer to 411, and indeed most plausibly only 25% of that.

In which case the hoax can last more than a century!! When everyone will be dead anyway.

But anyway, the fact that the Hoax hasn't been revealed is thus mathematically calculated to be NO OBSTACLE to its reality, if you use the correct number estimation on the size of insiders (125 tops).

Jump Ball wrote:

This so-called "astronaut" Scott Kelly just shows his ignorance with Steph, comparing other "hoaxes" to NASA's baloney. And he is WRONG that the lunar NBA 3-point line would be 142 feet away, because that is *ONLY* the gravity effect (6x), while the REAL difficulty in hitting a "3-pointer" is in muscular precision (anyone can chuck the ball that far, as a shot put). This would ITSELF change under the lunar conditions (if we ever get a moon there to experiment). And that's just as a preliminary observation. (Other details are how balls travel in Earth's Moon's vacuum)

So, simply because you can hurl the ball 6 times further due to fewer gravity, that DOESN'T MEAN you can SHOOT it with any accuracy at this longer distance!!!

An amateur's error. What one expects from NASA.

The real scientific method would be send someone to Earth's Moon and have them shoot basketballs there. Unlike golf, it's NOT just distance that mostly matters.

So you have to wonder why, in the interest of science, they haven't sent a man 'back' to the moon (with good B-Ball range preferably) to test this.....

Conspiring Equation wrote:

For a hoax to persist five years, no more than 2,521 people can be active participants: that is, be aware that the conspiracy exists. To last 25 years, that number drops to 502. And to last a century: 125 people tops.

Of course, the idiot investigator claims ALL 411000 NASA employees would "need to be involved", but reality says it's closer to 411, and indeed most plausibly only 25% of that.

In which case the hoax can last more than a century!! When everyone will be dead anyway.

But anyway, the fact that the Hoax hasn't been revealed is thus mathematically calculated to be NO OBSTACLE to its reality, if you use the correct number estimation on the size of insiders (125 tops).

This is indeed the most ridiculous statement (among many) from the anti-hoax believers.

For instance, how many of KFC's employees know the 11 secret herbs and spices? By NASA apologist logic, they all would! But cleverly, the capitalist sellers figure out a way to COMPARTMENTALIZE the knowledge! Gee, what a novel concept, never would have thunked that.

And how many in the casino-ware supply chain would know how to manufacture phoney chips? It goes to say.

Cut it out with all the troll posts, you're making those of us who truly believe that the moon landing was a total hoax look like idiots.

Oh, 'ang a sec...

Conspiring Equation wrote:

For a hoax to persist five years, no more than 2,521 people can be active participants: that is, be aware that the conspiracy exists. To last 25 years, that number drops to 502. And to last a century: 125 people tops.

Of course, the idiot investigator claims ALL 411000 NASA employees would "need to be involved", but reality says it's closer to 411, and indeed most plausibly only 25% of that.

In which case the hoax can last more than a century!! When everyone will be dead anyway.

But anyway, the fact that the Hoax hasn't been revealed is thus mathematically calculated to be NO OBSTACLE to its reality, if you use the correct number estimation on the size of insiders (125 tops).

And that's not even considering that NASA trusted private companies to be in on the hoax. Don't forget to add in all the engineers at North American Aviation, Grumman, Boeing, GM.

They all did this knowing someday it would be discovered and they USA would be completely and thoroughly discredited. The Soviets and USA had already probes and rovers to the moon at that time. With the quick progress of space exploration at time, surely someone eventually would discover it. So, why in the world world anyone make that make that decision to do the most massive, costly, eloborate, hoax, when getting caught is assured with human progress and the consequences would be devastating for the Nation. Of course teams of people and their leaders would agree to it. And of course all the following administrations, agency heads, corporations, universities, etc. would continue the coverup.

Soviets poll at 57% to know it is a hoax, because they know how easy it is to manipulate opinion with propaganda, when in control of all sources of information like USA. Combined with school indoctrination, the next generations can indulge their corruption just the same.

Over a half of all Russians believe that US astronauts have never been on the Moon and that the US authorities and NASA covered up this fact by forging proof of moon landings, a new poll 2018 shows.

In the recent survey titled “Science and society: authority and trust” experts of the Russian state-run public opinion research center VTSIOM wrote that 57 percent of Russians currently think that the US claims of successful manned Moon missions are lies and that the documented proof of these missions was forged. Only 24 percent of respondents said that they believed that the manned Moon missions were real.

Researchers also specified that 65 percent of those who think that the US authorities are lying about the moon landings have secondary education.

Too many Details, the Lies win in the end wrote:

But we KNOW that formula for distance is D = (1/2) * g * T^2

where g is gravity accelleration (supposedly Moon's) and T is Time. and D is distance

Let's plug-in the variables. Now T= 1.1 (s) at most, while from "basic moon facts" we know g is 1/6 that of Earth! Which is 9.8 m/s^2 in SI units. So on Earth's Moon, it is 1.63 m/s^2, in SI units.

Multiplying, this yields 1/2 * (1.63) * 1.1^2 = 0.986 meters.

I think it hurts your argument when you have to use Math to prove it. Most readers will have tuned out by then.

Boo-Hoo, the Professional Scientists are upset when anyone strays from the indoctrination plantation.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2699262-shaqs-flat-earth-jokes-are-no-laughing-matter-for-scientists

Yet again, the anti-hoax believers feel they are losing, so spin out to try to attach Flat Earth into the mix.