HR is calculated from moving data only on Strava. Also HR data is coming from his Coros watch, not Whoop. Morons lol.
The average HR for that 1 kilometer is calculated over the course of the 21 minutes it took to complete that kilometer.
No you are wrong.
Strava uses moving time only to calculate HR averages.
Proof?? wrote:
No you are wrong.
Strava uses moving time only to calculate HR averages.
Interestingly this is the only day where his moving time is very close to the elapsed time so all the breaks are included within the splits. Usually he'd have over 1hr 30 of elapsed time each day.
So if 'strava uses moving time only to calculate HR averages' then by this logic you'd expect to see the HR drop when he is taking 27 mins to complete a km rather than 7mins.
LFG wrote:
Just a bunch of old men on here who seem really upset that no one wants to sniff their jock strap because it wreaks of bitterness and jealousy. WG’s jock strap smells like victory.
As opposed to all the flat earthers that worship the influencer god, who predominantly seem to be very young, niave boys, struggling to come to terms with their own musculinity and in all likelihood, still believe in Santa.
Even when I was very young I deplored my peers who mocked the wisdom of age. It's a very silly outlook that stunts your own abilty to grow wise.
Cockerell Army wrote:
Interestingly this is the only day where his moving time is very close to the elapsed time so all the breaks are included within the splits. Usually he'd have over 1hr 30 of elapsed time each day.
So if 'strava uses moving time only to calculate HR averages' then by this logic you'd expect to see the HR drop when he is taking 27 mins to complete a km rather than 7mins.
I believe I’ve seen 2 other days where both moving and elapsed time were almost the same. Also, I know there was one day where the data came from “Coros Wearables” instead of the Coros watch. I thought that was odd.
Proof?? wrote:
No you are wrong.
Strava uses moving time only to calculate HR averages.
Almost all of that time is considered moving time in this activity. His elapsed time shows only 61 seconds longer than his "moving time" for the whole activity. He's so obviously not running, because nobody runs a 30 minute mile and a 21 minute mile at the same heart rate as they do an 11:30 mile. Look at the activity. It's almost all moving time.
Goodge Will Hunting wrote:
Where is the proof he is doing it? In this digital age, and also after the Transcon shambles, the burden of proof is on him. Live stream with Starlink, day in, day out, we can troll the data, prove his step count is accurate. Then put up HR from 2 watches, might be discrepancies here and there but nothing for anyone to jump out and say CHEAT!
For whatever reason Goodge is never going to provide the data you want.
Whether you like it or not his sponsors, his followers and the media are happy to believe him without it. So in this instance, in order to change their minds, the burden of proof is on you.
well not exactly since Goodge himself said he appreciates there’s a “higher burden of proof when going for a record”. He and his team have now also publically encouraged skeptics to come and view him and see him actually running. but so far that’s all they’ve encouraged without addressing the main concerns with the days he’s already done: his HR data. why doesn’t he release that or provide more video proof in regards to his live HR while running. is he feeding off the drama and using it to boost his stock, or is his data bogus. until they release more data or someone observing him can collect real time HR readings that conflict with his past days, i don’t think we’ll know for sure.
I can tell you’re fairly low IQ from the way you write but you’re trying to appear intelligent. It’s ok I understand, you need to try and put other people’s intelligence down so you feel better about your own lack thereof.
I’m not putting down the wisdom of age, I’m putting down the pig headedness of the old c*nts in this thread.
LFG wrote:
I can tell you’re fairly low IQ from the way you write but you’re trying to appear intelligent. It’s ok I understand, you need to try and put other people’s intelligence down so you feel better about your own lack thereof.
I’m not putting down the wisdom of age, I’m putting down the pig headedness of the old c*nts in this thread.
Anyone who claims to know the "IQ" of someone in this way is not of sufficient intelligence to understand what IQ is, how it is measured and what its limitations are. It seems to be a popular thing at the moment to say on the internet as I have responded by asking the people saying this recently to guess what I scored on the Mensa Cattell B test and what my highest academic qualifications are. The interesting response has been these are not relevant to what the person was claiming. Not understanding self-contradiction is probably linked to low intelligence.
I bet you’re fun at parties with your bachelors degree and 105 IQ.
My point was that him trying to put down other people’s intelligence was just proof of a lack of his own intelligence.
LFG wrote:
My point was that him trying to put down other people’s intelligence was just proof of a lack of his own intelligence.
But you doing the same thing isn't?
How about everyone focuses on the evidence, or lack of it? Nothing else is relevant here. The likeability or intelligence of anyone involved is beside the point.
You've just been taken to school young man. Cringed reading your posts, oh dear.
LFG wrote:
If I’m wrong and someone can prove to me that he’s cheating then I will come back to this thread and apologise to everyone that I’ve trolled and insulted.
This really says it all - you've got nothing useful or interesting to contribute at all. You're just another troll.
No one here is remotely interested in changing your mind on anything. It'd be like trying to explain The Last of Us to my cat.
LFG wrote:
Just a bunch of old men on here who seem really upset that no one wants to sniff their jock strap because it wreaks of bitterness and jealousy. WG’s jock strap smells like victory.
I'm going to have to call you out on this as well because what the hell has someone's age got to with their ability to comment on this? You don't even know the ages of most of the people on here.
Contrary to what you seem to believe these comments are not making you look more intelligent than everybody else.
There are plenty of dark corners of the internet where your bigoted views will be welcomed, but this is a running forum.
I'm 42 and one quarter 😂
Just so everyone knows!
I’m 32 and three quarters :)
Keep cringing reading my posts! Will G will keep tearing up that Aussie tarmac and smash the record and you’ll all still be crying on here about “the data”.
You lot can give it but can’t take it. Happy to throw out insults like crotch sniffers, flat earthers etc but don’t like anything else being said back to you. And yeah I don’t know any of your ages but you all sound pretty old and miserable from what I can tell.
