louder for the ignorant ones in the back wrote:
Kevin Hadsell wrote:
It is good to see so many women getting into the profession. I think that this is going to improve the level of coaching overall. Now there is far more competition for the jobs. Coaches in the profession have to work even harder to produce and continue to move up or to break into the industry.
You can always make the argument that there are more qualified people than each of the hires. If all schools did was hire the person with the longest resume, where would we be? The importance of making a great hire is to find someone that is going to be the best fit for the job not just the most qualified. Not all qualifications can be, or need to be, quantified.
Bottom line is that coaching cross country and track used to be a Boys Only Club. No Girls Allowed. Now, it is opened up. If that means everyone has to step up their game, recruit harder, work harder, be open to new ideas and training, be more compassionate, be more visible, well....then that is what it means.
From a comfortable chair on the beach....
~Kevin
YES. Thank you for saying this.
Sincerely,
Female coach who will no doubt be torn apart on this dumpster fire message board
What it really mens is that the male coaches have to "step up their game, recruit harder, work harder, be open to new ideas and training, be more compassionate, be more visible."
And that's fine. It's an effort to speed up the diversity of the profession. But call it what it is. UConn did not consider a single male candidate for this position at any time.