Are "flat-earthers" an actual thing?

>40 IQ score wrote:

Are you retarded?

Not cool, dude.

Felix Baumgarter jumped from a pod, carried by a weather balloon, at 24.2 miles above earth. The photos from that event sure make the earth seem spherical to me. Does either side look at those photos and have any commentary to strengthen or weaken their argument?

Wow, just wow wrote:

Felix Baumgarter jumped from a pod, carried by a weather balloon, at 24.2 miles above earth. The photos from that event sure make the earth seem spherical to me. Does either side look at those photos and have any commentary to strengthen or weaken their argument?

That is because he used a very wide angle lens which distorted the frame.

Ok, he used a wide angle lense. I don't know if that's true, I wouldn't know. Does anybody else see anything there that would lend to this discussion?

Wow, just wow wrote:

Felix Baumgarter jumped from a pod, carried by a weather balloon, at 24.2 miles above earth. The photos from that event sure make the earth seem spherical to me. Does either side look at those photos and have any commentary to strengthen or weaken their argument?

The camera he had used a wide angle lens. Everything will look exaggeratedly rounded.

The plane "meet up" in Antarctica already disproved the flat Earth theory, that's why LQ has vanished.

Vhina just released 1000s of photo from the moon. They all look very heat and vastly different from the NASA photos.

China rules wrote:

Vhina just released 1000s of photo from the moon. They all look very heat and vastly different from the NASA photos.

That's because they are to be viewed through a different shape of eye.

Okay, flat earther, what are the two cities that are farthest apart on your map?

mmmmhhhmmmm wrote:

Okay, flat earther, what are the two cities that are farthest apart on your map?

Here is their map:

So probably Ushuaia and somewhere on the tip of Tasmania or the South Island of NZ.

I don't know why but this topic fascinates me. So if Antarctica is a ring of ice surrounding our flat world, why is the center of the world also ice?

>40 IQ score wrote:

fast Eddie f wrote:

[quote]>40 IQ score wrote:

[quote]fast Eddie f wrote:

No, Einstein. My point was that if you're going to start defining the difference in the amount of gravity, then start with the correct information, which you won't have. What you're missing in your little geezimsofreekinsmartithurtslookimadewordtithaha brain is that the amount of gravity is irrelevant. It's the angle. But that's using your physics.

You have made it very, very clear that you have absolutely no comprehension of basic physics (which is not surprising at all since you think the Earth is flat.) Under no circumstances humanly possible could the curvature of the Earth affect the pool ball enough so it rolls to the center.

I'm asking you a third time, Are you retarded?

I'm not the one making up numbers here. Are you referring to the same humanly possible world that can mass produce a semiconductor with a 14 nanometer gate size, or fabricate a high-definition camera lens with such precision, it fits on the tip of a pencil?

You do have an A -game, don't you? Or maybe this was it.

Yeah but those things were done by people who aren't stupid.

You are stupid.

Wow, just wow wrote:

I don't know why but this topic fascinates me. So if Antarctica is a ring of ice surrounding our flat world, why is the center of the world also ice?

I already asked this.

It is because the path of the sun is located at half the radius from the center to the outer edge.

This means that the temperature, sizex and distance of the sun are different from commonly accepted numbers, meaning this is an exciting new brach of physics.

How come flat Earthers never try to get their own proof? Instead of using scotch-tape physics to convince the uneducated, why not tie a 50$ camera to a balloon and expose the truth? Why not try to visit the thousands of miles of "ice wall" that prevents us from rolling off our perfectly flat frisbee? If you got ONE legit picture, your "argument" would seem much more plausible. I think I know why this doesn't happen though.

ansnsnnssnnssnsnsnansn wrote:

Yeah but those things were done by people who aren't stupid.

I know, and it went right over your head.

It's very telling that the globalists have to resort to name-calling to get their point across. Very telling, indeed.

Uncommon sense wrote:

How come flat Earthers never try to get their own proof? Instead of using scotch-tape physics to convince the uneducated, why not tie a 50$ camera to a balloon and expose the truth? Why not try to visit the thousands of miles of "ice wall" that prevents us from rolling off our perfectly flat frisbee? If you got ONE legit picture, your "argument" would seem much more plausible. I think I know why this doesn't happen though.

This is a balloon flight that was used to support flat-earth on a website I read.

When you put flight patterns on a flat earth map they become straight lines. Hmm...