Brack P. wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
1) CORRECT!
2) Change "most" to "vast majority", and it's even more right. Those who don't need to invest the way I do are those who...have an enormous salary (I'm talking millions each year for years and years...think Major League baseball players), people who are retired and now just withdrawing money, people who are independently wealthy (through inheritance, divorce, whatever). If you have anywhere from below average income all the way up to a million dollars a year even, you would be best served my following my strategies.
3) Remember that my way DOES allow people to invest in individual stocks or anything else really. You just have to meet some criteria first...NO debt at all, a paid-for house OR enough extra money to handle rent increases the rest of your life, a million dollars minimum in the stock market, continuing to put in 15% or more into your retirement accounts if working. Have all that, THEN you can invest in individual stocks or a restaurant or whatever else.
Personally, I couldn't live like Flagpole. Having to scrimp and save for 40-50 years before even thinking about having enough to retire is not for me. Fortunately, I got a great job out of college which led to some lucrative opportunities early in life. I was able to spend on travel, nice homes, etc. throughout my life and still save and retire early.
Flagpole's strategy is great for someone who perhaps didn't make wise decisions on their education choices and career path. People like that HAVE to save and grow every dollar in order to be able to retire since their lifetime income is so low. They can't take investment risks because there is no way to recover from loses without the ability to generate significant future income. One loss could devastate them. These people have to play it conservatively and hope everything works in their favor.
A prime example of poking the bear.