OFFICIAL LRC President Donald Trump SECOND TERM Thread

gnarlysheen wrote:

Nancy S. wrote:

The NCPC says they have not issued any permits nor did they approve demolition of the East Wing.

I wonder what the AIA thinks?

Haha. What the hell would the AIA have to do with anything? If your point is what I think it may be, but hard to tell due to your cluelessness, perhaps the state board of architectural examiners may have something to say? That is, only if the practicing architects are not licensed or operating within the bounds of the rules of practice issued by the AIA, not enforced by the AIA.

Further, I highly doubt the architects are not registered with their examination board.

In fact, I just looked up McCrery Architects.

I think what you're trying to say is that the local authority have jurisdiction (AHJ) may have something to say if they are constructing buildings without approved building permits within that authority which governs D.C.

What you don't know is none of this really matters much since the White House is federal property, so city building permits are not required.

So, to answer your question, it doesn't matter what the AIA thinks. McCrery Architects is a legally licensed entity operating within the law.

gnarlysheen wrote:

El Runkin wrote:

You biff-faced liar. You get likes because you are a fatuous liar on 'ludes and beans. You said the MAGA Capitol riots of 1/6/21 were a "guided tour" and a "setup." And now you're changing your whole tune when presented with uncontroverted testimonial evidence of the Chief of Capitol Police, Steven Sund:

"The mob was violently and ruthlessly attacking law enforcement officers in an effort to breach their lines. The officers fought courageously against the violent attackers for
over an hour before any individuals in the mob were able to breach the Capitol Building."

"As the crowds breached the building, USCP attempted to secure the hallways and prevent the mob from advancing further into the building. The USCP initiated evacuations of the two Chambers and USCP officers began to move Members of Congress to safe locations."

"an insurrection of thousands of armed, violent, and coordinated individuals focused
on breaching a building at all costs"

Steven Sund thinks you are a liar. People like him (Steven Sund) don't like people like you (geeks, liars). You know what J. Christ said about you liar types? He said: "For by your words you will be acquitted, and by your words you will be condemned." Matthew 12:37 (Synod 2.0 Edib.)

Yawn.

It could have been avoided, numb nuts. And you know it.

You aren't doing so well these days.

Nancy S. wrote:

gnarlysheen wrote:

Haha. What the hell would the AIA have to do with anything? If your point is what I think it may be, but hard to tell due to your cluelessness, perhaps the state board of architectural examiners may have something to say? That is, only if the practicing architects are not licensed or operating within the bounds of the rules of practice issued by the AIA, not enforced by the AIA.

Further, I highly doubt the architects are not registered with their examination board.

In fact, I just looked up McCrery Architects.

I think what you're trying to say is that the local authority have jurisdiction (AHJ) may have something to say if they are constructing buildings without approved building permits within that authority which governs D.C.

What you don't know is none of this really matters much since the White House is federal property, so city building permits are not required.

So, to answer your question, it doesn't matter what the AIA thinks. McCrery Architects is a legally licensed entity operating within the law.

YOU were the one that claimed they needed permits on the previous page:

"More TDS. Classic keyboard architect response. Did you forget I am an architect/ developer and Ivy League trained? All of what you say is nonsense because it is required to obtain permits. Your sense of things is adolescent at best."

Now you're saying they don't need permits or don't have them.

Make up your mind.

El Runkin wrote:

gnarlysheen wrote:

Yawn.

It could have been avoided, numb nuts. And you know it.

You aren't doing so well these days.

Here's that Steven Sund testimony you were inquiring about earlier. Sund was Chief of Capitol Police during the January 6, 2021 MAGA Capitol riot. He was there. You kept mentioning Steven Sund, then when you were provided a link to his testimony before the Senate, you ran away. Bring it up, then run away. Up, run. Up, then run. It's a pattern with you.

Link:www.rules.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/BA0...

"The events on January 6, 2021, constituted the worst attack on law enforcement that I have seen in my entire career. This was an attack that we are learning was pre-planned, and involved participants from a number of states who came well equipped, coordinated, and prepared to carry out a violent insurrection at the United States Capitol. I witnessed insurgents beating police officers with fists, pipes, sticks, bats, metal barricades, and flag poles. These criminals came prepared for war."

"As the crowds breached the building, USCP attempted to secure the hallways and prevent the mob from advancing further into the building."

"While the violent attack that took place was unspeakable, and those responsible for this violent insurrection should be held accountable, I am proud of the men and women of the U.S. Capitol Police, the vast majority of whom fought valiantly and risked their lives to protect Members of Congress, their staff, and the Capitol building."

"The mob was violently and ruthlessly attacking law enforcement officers in an effort to breach their lines. The officers fought courageously against the violent attackers for over an hour before any individuals in the mob were able to breach the Capitol Building."

gnarlysheen wrote:

Nancy S. wrote:

YOU were the one that claimed they needed permits on the previous page:

"More TDS. Classic keyboard architect response. Did you forget I am an architect/ developer and Ivy League trained? All of what you say is nonsense because it is required to obtain permits. Your sense of things is adolescent at best."

Now you're saying they don't need permits or don't have them.

Make up your mind.

LMAO. First you're concerned about the AIA of which you have no clue about, now you're confused about what to get mad about.

All of that stuff is required to obtain permits, Nancy. In this case since the AHJ doesn't issue permits for federal buildings, the governing agencies must approve construction plans in a similar manner, requiring the same documentation, which they did, otherwise construction would have been halted. But they didn't issue permits, Nancy, like you implied they should have, because they do not release federal building information to the public due to security concerns.

Let's see what you come back with. There must be something else you don't like that I could explain to you.