[President Trump] won everything because the American people resoundingly chose him over Kamala.
If you're talking about the "American people," then you're talking about the popular vote. He got something over two million more votes than Harris.
And in 2016, H. Clinton got nearly three million more votes than he did. Are you saying the American people "resoundingly" chose her?
He won. Let that be enough. Stop trying to pretend that the vote of the American people gave him carte blanche to do whatever he wanted--which is what you're really trying to say when you talk about a fictitious "mandate."
(a) He won--and (b) we, the American voters, did not give him permission to break the law and flout the Constitution during his presidency. BOTH of those statements are true.
This post was edited 9 minutes after it was posted.
No true conservative/Republican here wants Trump to be able to run roughshod to pursue his agenda. I certainly want restraints on the guy and think most do as well.
So Alligator Alcatraz is not a true conservative?
No, not at all: Whether sincere or trolling, s/he is (or is cosplaying) a cultist and a fascist.
Wrong. another flat out wrong liberal expose which is meaningless because 👇
education does not equal competence.
Do better.
There are plenty of Ivy league guys, virtually all of them, who do not have basic competence. they try to excel at one thing, this means 90% or so of your brain is dead on arrival.
take some Harvard grad, without the use of materials to study, and point him to a construction lift and have him operate it. not a chance. but, 90% of kids who don’t graduate high school could think ot thru and figure it out. Examples are endless. there is no correlation between education and general competence.
I may have to disagree. Any monkey can operate a forklift. Not anyone can learn how to describe physics.
Oh, and do you really think quoting Jesus Christ makes any sense after saying this:
"you're changing your tune like some pencil necked, flip flopping geek who gets beat up by blacks on his own lawn because of his inherent weaknesses that blacks can sense a mile away."
You're a hypocritical chump, dude. A joke. A self-righteous nobody in real life. You work for someone like a slave and take out your insecurities and unhappiness in this cute little thread because it gives you confidence. LMAO.
You get likes because people think your insane nonsense is entertaining. Like a monkey. On coke and alcohol. Dance monkey, dance. Otherwise, empty brained.
You biff-faced liar. You get likes because you are a fatuous liar on 'ludes and beans. You said the MAGA Capitol riots of 1/6/21 were a "guided tour" and a "setup." And now you're changing your whole tune when presented with uncontroverted testimonial evidence of the Chief of Capitol Police, Steven Sund:
"The mob was violently and ruthlessly attacking law enforcement officers in an effort to breach their lines. The officers fought courageously against the violent attackers for over an hour before any individuals in the mob were able to breach the Capitol Building."
"As the crowds breached the building, USCP attempted to secure the hallways and prevent the mob from advancing further into the building. The USCP initiated evacuations of the two Chambers and USCP officers began to move Members of Congress to safe locations."
"an insurrection of thousands of armed, violent, and coordinated individuals focused on breaching a building at all costs"
Steven Sund thinks you are a liar. People like him (Steven Sund) don't like people like you (geeks, liars). You know what J. Christ said about you liar types? He said: "For by your words you will be acquitted, and by your words you will be condemned." Matthew 12:37 (Synod 2.0 Edib.)
Yawn.
It could have been avoided, numb nuts. And you know it.
I personally cannot wait for the 2040 ads that say, "¡La señorita Ocasio-Cortez está a favor del Latinx/el socialismo; el presidente Rubio está a favor de tú!"
Igual--pero tengo preguntas sobre tu gramática española. Any native speakers want to weigh in (and correct my own Spanish where needed)?
Trump now wants US taxpayers to pay for his criminal legal bills..
“Breaking News: President Trump wants $230 million from the Justice Department for investigating him, people familiar with the matter say. Any settlement might ultimately be approved by senior department officials who defended him or those in his orbit.”
This is great! The federal government can give Trump $230 million and he can then use that money to build his ballroom! Everyone wins!
Ballroom is already funded by private philanthropists, Nancy.
Hey, while we're on the subject, what do you think of Obama's $376 million White House renovation costs? (2010-2014).
All core building renovations were funded by U.S. taxpayers, through the Architect of the Capitol and the General Services Administration (GSA) budgets.
“Things are getting so bad in Europe that we are reaching out to the Germans to ask them if they can crack down on it a little bit”
Rob Schneider SNL
Haa!! truth in humor of the day
If you want some real dark comedy, go read some of Moron Mamdani's tweets. It's a mix of pro-terroristic socialism and idiotic, nonsensical horse sh!t.
Peace Deals & Trade Deals in Malaysia "Together, we'll create incredible prosperity for the nations on both sides of the Pacific Ocean, and seize new opportunities for all of our people." - President Donald J. Trump
But he DOESN'T. I'll link to Nate Silver's poll-of-polls, but I defy you to produce ANY averager of polls that has his approval numbers at their highest ever. (Sorry, cherry-picked individual polls don't count.)
yeah the DOJ that indicted Hunter Biden and Dem senator mendendez was clearly being ordered around by the WH.
And trump didn't commit all those crimes.
You are on to something. Probably meth, given you are a trumper, but you are on to something.
You ran your experiment and it didn’t go so well. now we run ours.
Ar the end of our experiment, we will have turned the anti gun rights crowd into the biggest gun rights advocates. then our mission will be accomplished.
This guy isn't worth your time, man. He's an extremist Jihadist. Lights are off.
But he DOESN'T. I'll link to Nate Silver's poll-of-polls, but I defy you to produce ANY averager of polls that has his approval numbers at their highest ever. (Sorry, cherry-picked individual polls don't count.)
This is great! The federal government can give Trump $230 million and he can then use that money to build his ballroom! Everyone wins!
Ballroom is already funded by private philanthropists, Nancy.
Hey, while we're on the subject, what do you think of Obama's $376 million White House renovation costs? (2010-2014).
All core building renovations were funded by U.S. taxpayers, through the Architect of the Capitol and the General Services Administration (GSA) budgets.
Don't be such a naive fool, Nancy.
Obama renovations? Congress approved the funding in 2008 following a report by the administration of then-President George W. Bush, and the renovations aimed to upgrade the building's aging infrastructure. Upgrades included replacing decades-old heating, cooling, electrical, and fire-alarm equipment as well as unspecified security systems.
Sounds like they did it the right way. A study of the structure and existing systems, followed by Congress approving funds, etc.
Really nothing at all like the Big Beautiful Ballroom.
Hey, while we're on the subject, what do you think of Obama's $376 million White House renovation costs? (2010-2014).
I think that simple statement, without its context, isbullshit. Feel free to fact-check each part of this summary:
Publicly funded infrastructure project Funding and approval: A four-year project to upgrade the White House's heating, cooling, electrical, and fire-alarm systems was approved by Congress in2008, during the George W. Bush administration. Purpose: The $376 million was allocated to replace decades-old, failing infrastructure. It was not used for cosmetic or decorative purposes. Oversight: The work was overseen by the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) and was part of a planned modernization, not an initiative by the Obama administration.
Privately funded aesthetic updates Family quarters: The Obama family paid for the redecoration of their personal living quarters using private funds, declining to use the $100,000 allowance provided to incoming presidents for that purpose. Oval Office: The Oval Office was redecorated with new furnishings and a custom-made rug. These updates were paid for with private money from the White House Endowment Trust. Outdoor spaces: First Lady Michelle Obama planted the White House Kitchen Garden on the South Lawn. The family also paid for the resurfacing of the existing tennis court to double as a basketball court.
Obama won by a landslide but he was expected to win. Trump’s victory is more historic because of the amount of lawfare he endured and that he wasn’t expected to win the popular vote. But he won everything because the American people resoundingly chose him over Kamala.
So, you're saying that a rich white guy beating a multi-racial woman was more unexpected and historic than a black man becoming POTUS?
This is great! The federal government can give Trump $230 million and he can then use that money to build his ballroom! Everyone wins!
Ballroom is already funded by private philanthropists, Nancy.
Hey, while we're on the subject, what do you think of Obama's $376 million White House renovation costs? (2010-2014).
All core building renovations were funded by U.S. taxpayers, through the Architect of the Capitol and the General Services Administration (GSA) budgets.
Don't be such a naive fool, Nancy.
I usually don't go on social media to call people an idiot but you win the title. You Idiot!!! The $376 million was approved in 2008 when Bush was president. Remember him???
But he DOESN'T. I'll link to Nate Silver's poll-of-polls, but I defy you to produce ANY averager of polls that has his approval numbers at their highest ever. (Sorry, cherry-picked individual polls don't count.)
But he DOESN'T. I'll link to Nate Silver's poll-of-polls, but I defy you to produce ANY averager of polls that has his approval numbers at their highest ever. (Sorry, cherry-picked individual polls don't count.)
Nate Silver??? He's inaccurate with a far left bias. You have got to do better than posting his garbage. C'mon man.
At the risk of repetition: I defy you to produce ANY averager of polls that has his approval numbers at their highest ever.
In fact, I'll go farther: I defy you to pick any two polls of your choice that show he currently has "approval numbers at their highest ever." Many or most polls had him with 50+% percent approval, immediately post-inauguration; now many or most have him underwater.
Shoot, I'll go even farther: Find ONE poll of your choice that has him NOW with his highest approval numbers ever. If you can, I'll donate $100 to the charity of your choice. Fair?