Are you surprised? These are the same people that believe the “ hands up don’t shoot” lie, and they believe black people are intentionally shot by police 24/7.
( 10 unarmed blacks killed by police in 2019; 23 whites)
BLM has continued the lie and we’re seeing the results in our streets.
Samuel Mahele Akili wrote:
https://www.usada.org/athletes/substances/marijuana-faq/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CBased%20on%20current%20animal%20and,some%20athletes%20and%20sports%20disciplines.%E2%80%9DThis to shed some light weed has some performance benefits
I finally took the time to read through the Marijuana FAQs chronicling USDA's extensive opinions from this official statement which seems to be barely updated from when it was created around 2011. Spice is emphasized and most of the points are from a prohibition (we know what's best for you) viewpoint. There's a tremendous knowledge gap and I would expect this viewpoint so as to sync with Federal Law. The article is so old it doesn't mention CBD via acronym but rather used the fuller chemical name and explains it is banned, though I believe the THC free versions are now permitted.
For those who advocate changing the US Federal law to reflect the shifting cultural norms and state laws, I would think that would come from a change on the Federal schedule 1 Cannabis Designation in the US before we would have effective moral ground to push for a change at the WADA level. I believe that after arguably the most conservative current Supreme Court Justice would like to see that Federal prohibition go away as a matter of constitutional principles and dare I say... common sense. You might well see Congress's view change and bipartisan support with a President's signature on it. Justice Thomas almost seems to be requesting that the right case come before SCOTUS. When it come to pot in the US on the Federal vs State leval, it's Law and Disorder.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/28/supreme-court-justice-clarence-thomas-says-federal-marijuana-laws-may-be-outdated-.htmlBack to the actual topic at hand... I hope to see the situation change that Sha'Carri Richardson competes in the OG 100. Seems like it's not carved in stone yet as to whether she will be able to or not. Other opinions will continue vary wildly whether or not she should be allowed to compete. I've read all your different views and why. Thanks! We'll see how it shakes out
i have no problem with people using weed.
I have no belief that the only substance Sha’Carri is getting jacked on is weed. but i guess thats how it goes looking at elites. but she looks jacked beyond belief. so i belive she is using much more performance enhancing things than weed and practice. give it a few years. perhaps we'll find out.
Yawn^7 wrote:
2600 bro wrote:
1) Cosby was released due to prosecutorial misconduct. Anyone with a brain knows that the truth is he’s still guilty. But we can’t just have prosecutors lying to defendants. It was the correct decision.
2) You missed the point AGAIN. You’re having a rough day. You were bemoaning how we have pages and pages of discussion if she’s obviously guilty by-the-letter. Clearly we are discussing the moral aspect and how things should be handled in the future and what’s “fair.” Just like you did with Chauvin verdict - he’s guilty but we still had endless debates about what’s right or not outside of the narrow confines of the law.
Each post just increases your “internal inconsistency” score. I applaud your dedication to being so dumb.
Lol I’m having the rough day?
The smart people like myself have already told you why the DQ stands and why it is proper. I have also openly said many times that if people want to change the rule they are free to do so.
There isn’t anything really moral to argue here. I’m actually starting to feel concerned for your mental health.
I do enjoy reading your nonsense don’t worry :)
There’s plenty moral here to argue. Many laws, rules, guidelines, etc. are immoral or unfair!
Surely you can’t argue that existence of a law inherently defends its morality. Then I will have to become the worried one!
Just read an article on CNN about “how we and usa track should treat Richardson”. Jesus. I’m all for peds and anything else being legal but the shear idiocy of this is unreal. I have zero sympathy for her dumb a$$ and that’s exactly what she is. Young and effn stupid. We’ve all been there. Now she’ll just go down as one of the dumbest athletes ever. Which, tbh, we all knew she belonged in that category well before the failed test lol.
She’s obviously cheated before so maybe some karma getting her.
She wasn’t beating an insanely juiced up SAFP anyway. Would of liked to see it tho.
Now can we worry about the athletes who rep this country that we can be proud of. Felix, Muhammad, Sydney, Prandeni, Norman, Lyles, Crouser, Rai, Harrison, the unhealthy looking distance peeps. Lets goooo
kjbacieub wrote:
mordechai wrote:
I am sure non-blacks have been banned for marijuana use.........plenty of them.
Michael Phelps was treated like a criminal, and yes, he served a ban.
Forgot all about Phelps lol. Yeah he got hammered.
from the usada page about marriage;
Long-term, chronic use of marijuana is associated with impaired thinking and memory, and even a loss of IQ among teenage users.
pupil3142 wrote:
Long-term, chronic use of marijuana is associated with impaired thinking and memory, and even a loss of IQ among teenage users.
That's why back in the sixties it was called dope, cos that's what it turned you in to.
Then sports people discovered it was a masking agent for PEDs
ok, i havent read all 23 pages, but i have seen this 'masking agent' stuff tossed around nilly willy with no evidence.
a banned drug cannot be a masking agent.
by definition, a masking agent is a substance that would otherwise not be banned, but is banned because it hides banned drugs.
you cannot have a masking agent that is banned for being itself.
please post wada statement that cannabis is banned as a masking agent. i have read all the usada stuff, and it aint there.
Lmao at Felix, Crouser, Lyles etc not being insanely juiced. Classic American take.
She is an adult who should be punished for her idiocy.
Says she doesn’t want to make excuses or get any sympathy then directly goes into excuse making and trying to get sympathy lol.
Honestly after hearing she did this while in Oregon for the trials I think she didn’t want to run at the Olympics and she found an easy out. That or she couldn’t count how far thirty days into the future would be lol.
Onward to the next female sprinter that comes out of nowhere from most likely LSU or another sec school.
How is nobody realizing the timing of her taking this may have been deliberate as she was either paid by a heavily invested marijuana company or has a beau who is involved running one.
A $250k or $500k payment to skip the Olympics and pittance $50k prize money yet generate massive press worth millions to have everyone talking about weed. Same way the person who paid $65 million for an NFT actually owned an NFT selling platform.
Watch for a company to announce sponsorship with her in 3-2-1
Interesting that the Jamaican publisher chooses not to write the words marijuana, cannabis, THC.
But do know the ban could be 3 months.
Richardson was on the right track when she said, “ I was wrong… I broke the rules… I’m only 2- so there will be other olympics… lesson learned”
Bingo!
If only other rule breakers and lawbreakers would react that way.
Accept responsibility, and use it as a lesson learned so it doesn’t happen again.
Turn a negative into a positive.
Instead, we get the usual racists and race baiters.
Richardson seems more ok with it than some of you fools.
You went and got my comments calling your b.s out deleted. I see how you work. Screw you and your pandering sob story.
rojo togo wrote:
You went and got my comments calling your b.s out deleted. I see how you work. Screw you and your pandering sob story.
I did not report you why would I do that we were having a simple conversation
rojo togo wrote:
You went and got my comments calling your b.s out deleted. I see how you work. Screw you and your pandering sob story.
I have never reported a post from anyone you were giving your opinion it must have been someone else
[quote]Stevu wrote:
Are you surprised? These are the same people that believe the “ hands up don’t shoot” lie, and they believe black people are intentionally shot by police 24/7.
( 10 unarmed blacks killed by police in 2019; 23 whites)
The cops kill at least 1,100 citizens in the USA every year.
We are supposed to believe only 33 of them were unarmed.
Apply a little common sense