Sorry. That was the wrong letter. Read this one:
chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/
-
01
-
Sorry again. the 3rd time is a charm. Here is the latest letter. I know you won't read it. But normal people did.
00 -
idiocy rater wrote:
Sorry again. the 3rd time is a charm. Here is the latest letter. I know you won't read it. But normal people did.
Instead of determining which of your links is the correct one, instead list them out. I made it easy for you.
Debunked Hunter Biden stories:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
31 -
Sally Vix wrote:
idiocy rater wrote:
Sorry again. the 3rd time is a charm. Here is the latest letter. I know you won't read it. But normal people did.
Instead of determining which of your links is the correct one, instead list them out. I made it easy for you.
Debunked Hunter Biden stories:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Reading is a skill. Learn it sometime. I will not do any of your work for you. You are a partisan hack. And a dumb one at that.
No offense.
But we do see the truthfulness of the statement: Trumpicans do not want the truth. They refuse to read anything that counters what they want to believe. They love the lies. They would rather live in Fox New bubble than read sworn testimony of a Trumper that was with Guliani digging up dirt.
23 -
idiocy rater wrote:
Sorry again. the 3rd time is a charm. Here is the latest letter. I know you won't read it. But normal people did.
Classic, Idiocy rater. LOL. The guy who wrote that, Lev Parnas, is a convicted felon and sitting in prison right now. I have a inclination to not believe convicted felons.
21 -
idiocy rater wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Instead of determining which of your links is the correct one, instead list them out. I made it easy for you.
Debunked Hunter Biden stories:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Reading is a skill. Learn it sometime. I will not do any of your work for you. You are a partisan hack. And a dumb one at that.
No offense.
But we do see the truthfulness of the statement: Trumpicans do not want the truth. They refuse to read anything that counters what they want to believe. They love the lies. They would rather live in Fox New bubble than read sworn testimony of a Trumper that was with Guliani digging up dirt.
Please don't call me a Trumpican. Am anything but. You Libs make up names for those on the other side because they don't argue with facts. Easier to just name call.
21 -
Sally Vix wrote:
idiocy rater wrote:
Sorry again. the 3rd time is a charm. Here is the latest letter. I know you won't read it. But normal people did.
Classic, Idiocy rater. LOL. The guy who wrote that, Lev Parnas, is a convicted felon and sitting in prison right now. I have a inclination to not believe convicted felons.
Exactly! You will not read it. Like I predicted.
He is a felon because of what he was doing for Trump. Acting as foreign agent digging up dirt for Trump. Trump surrounds himself with felons and will soon be one.
You are pathetic.
04 -
idiocy rater wrote:
For those that are slooooow on the uptake, when indictments are imminent Fox News creates "Breaking News about Hunter Biden". This is a pattern that repeats itself. Some story that has already been out there or has already been debunked or researched as yet another nothing burger gets repackaged as "BREAKING NEWS!!!".
And the right wingers rush to post it here.
Looks like about 17 GOP indictments coming out of Georgia Tomorrow afternoon or Wednesday. That is real "Breaking news".
How does Fox News always know, in advance of the rest of the media, when a Trump indictment is coming?
You're right that Trump indictments always seem to follow explosive bombshells about Biden family corruption. More damning news about the Bidens, and whaddya know time for another Trump indictment. But how does Fox News orchestrate this while every other media organization is several days behind? Do Jack Smith and Alvin Bragg give Fox News advance warning?
31 -
Academic Discussion wrote:
idiocy rater wrote:
For those that are slooooow on the uptake, when indictments are imminent Fox News creates "Breaking News about Hunter Biden". This is a pattern that repeats itself. Some story that has already been out there or has already been debunked or researched as yet another nothing burger gets repackaged as "BREAKING NEWS!!!".
And the right wingers rush to post it here.
Looks like about 17 GOP indictments coming out of Georgia Tomorrow afternoon or Wednesday. That is real "Breaking news".
How does Fox News always know, in advance of the rest of the media,
Everybody and their brother know indictments are coming this week. What are you smokin?
02 -
idiocy rater wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Classic, Idiocy rater. LOL. The guy who wrote that, Lev Parnas, is a convicted felon and sitting in prison right now. I have a inclination to not believe convicted felons.
Exactly! You will not read it. Like I predicted.
He is a felon because of what he was doing for Trump. Acting as foreign agent digging up dirt for Trump. Trump surrounds himself with felons and will soon be one.
You are pathetic.
This is how you argue your points:
Calling me pathetic
Calling me a partisan hack
Calling me a dumb partisan hack
Calling me lazy
Calling me one with simple brain.
I haven't called you one pejorative.
Won't be responding to you any more. Are you 12?
42 -
idiocy rater wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Instead of determining which of your links is the correct one, instead list them out. I made it easy for you.
Debunked Hunter Biden stories:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Reading is a skill. Learn it sometime. I will not do any of your work for you. You are a partisan hack. And a dumb one at that.
No offense.
But we do see the truthfulness of the statement: Trumpicans do not want the truth. They refuse to read anything that counters what they want to believe. They love the lies. They would rather live in Fox New bubble than read sworn testimony of a Trumper that was with Guliani digging up dirt.
Albert Einstein once said if you can't explain something simply, you don't understand it well enough. That's all Sally is asking for here. A simple explanation.
31 -
idiocy rater wrote:
Academic Discussion wrote:
How does Fox News always know, in advance of the rest of the media,
Everybody and their brother know indictments are coming this week. What are you smokin?
Looks like they already knew last week.
41 -
Inspiring leadership!
#FJB
This post was edited 2 minutes after it was posted.11 -
Academic Discussion wrote:
idiocy rater wrote:
Reading is a skill. Learn it sometime. I will not do any of your work for you. You are a partisan hack. And a dumb one at that.
No offense.
But we do see the truthfulness of the statement: Trumpicans do not want the truth. They refuse to read anything that counters what they want to believe. They love the lies. They would rather live in Fox New bubble than read sworn testimony of a Trumper that was with Guliani digging up dirt.
Albert Einstein once said if you can't explain something simply, you don't understand it well enough. That's all Sally is asking for here. A simple explanation.
FFS I just googled "hunter biden debunked" and got pages of fact checks on Hunter Biden. You can do the same.
If you people want to live in a fantasy world where Fox is trustworthy but the NYT isn't, that is your right, but don't bring us into that nihilistic hellscape.
01 -
let's just note here how successful Bannon has taken over the political landscape.
It's Hunter Biden over and over again and the zone will continue to be flooded, keeping the truth about the R party submerged. We'll just keep talking about Hunter Biden until enough people say 'well where there's smoke there's fire' and vote in the don't-tax-but-spend insurrectionists again.
11 -
Biden practices an "America Last" policy.
#FJB
11 -
agip wrote:
let's just note here how successful Bannon has taken over the political landscape.
It's Hunter Biden over and over again and the zone will continue to be flooded, keeping the truth about the R party submerged. We'll just keep talking about Hunter Biden until enough people say 'well where there's smoke there's fire' and vote in the don't-tax-but-spend insurrectionists again.
Wrong thread.
01 -
11
-
agip wrote:
Academic Discussion wrote:
Albert Einstein once said if you can't explain something simply, you don't understand it well enough. That's all Sally is asking for here. A simple explanation.
FFS I just googled "hunter biden debunked" and got pages of fact checks on Hunter Biden. You can do the same.
If you people want to live in a fantasy world where Fox is trustworthy but the NYT isn't, that is your right, but don't bring us into that nihilistic hellscape.
I have never had my suspicions more confirmed then on this last thread page, that right wingers are living in la, la land and simply refuse to learn anything that counters what they want to believe.
Mueller report: Won't read it.
Trump's indictments: Won't read any of them. Not one single word.
The guy that was in the rooms with all the dirt gathering attempt on Hunter Biden with Rudy and knows how it all went down is not a good source because he is a felon. And he is a felon for working with Rudy!
If you choose to be ignorant, that is your choice. Many people don't care either. But don't post hundreds of times on political threads while remaining oblivious.
21 -
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Do you think either of the George Bushes would have offered up "no comment" when asked about a catastrophe like the one happening now in Hawaii?
20
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.