Official LRC President Joseph R Biden Thread

More lies from dementia joe’s handlers. 👎👎👎🤡🥊❤️🍗 Even Dems are turning in him.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-admins-photos-of-empty-migrant-facility-are-misleading-texas-democrat-says-theyre-just-next-door

Libs need to admit he needs to go now. Enough with lying to America 👎👎👎💤💤🥊🐧👌

Hambeau wrote:

More lies from dementia joe’s handlers. 👎👎👎🤡🥊❤️🍗 Even Dems are turning in him.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-admins-photos-of-empty-migrant-facility-are-misleading-texas-democrat-says-theyre-just-next-door

Libs need to admit he needs to go now. Enough with lying to America 👎👎👎💤💤🥊🐧👌

I would agree that more needs to be done to help these kids. Funny how there was no outrage from the likes of you when Trump was doing worse. But, point taken.

So how you feeling about your 401K? You property value not too shabby either, eh?

call it like it is. wrote:

Independents and moderates (assuming some still exist) will be hesitant to vote for candidates embracing the big lie. Most are sick of trump and although his support will help a republican candidate earn the nomination, it will hurt them in general elections.

If the economy continues to do well and if Joe doesn't get too progressive with identity politics, police bashing and open borders, the Republicans are in trouble.

Don't count Liz Cheney out in the long game though. Her very effective letter in the Washington post made her truly a difficult person to attack without selling your soul.

Unfortunately:

It is apparent that there are LOTS of districts that are plenty red enough that pretty much anything the Rs do, the rep will still be an R.

It has been difficult to attack the "Up is up, day is day, white is white" non-lying comments of people like Romney and Cheney for a few years now without selling your soul. But still happening. Maybe worse.

The main measure of being "effective" would be her changing R minds. So far, that's not happening. And since 5+ years of horrendous Trump behavior and R enabling didn't do it, unfortunately, I highly doubt that Cheney will accomplish it. But yes, good for her (non-sarcastically).

Apparently Coward Kevin is terrified of being called as a witness to a Jan 6 commission, where he'd be asked by Dems what he and the Chief Seditionist chatted about on the day.

and another coach wrote:

Hambeau wrote:

More lies from dementia joe’s handlers. 👎👎👎🤡🥊❤️🍗 Even Dems are turning in him.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-admins-photos-of-empty-migrant-facility-are-misleading-texas-democrat-says-theyre-just-next-door

Libs need to admit he needs to go now. Enough with lying to America 👎👎👎💤💤🥊🐧👌

I would agree that more needs to be done to help these kids. Funny how there was no outrage from the likes of you when Trump was doing worse. But, point taken.

So how you feeling about your 401K? You property value not too shabby either, eh?

Let’s play hide and go seek with illegal immigrant kids just for political purposes. Does the dementia joe administration have no shame 👎🤡🥊💤💤🐧👌

agip wrote:

Apparently Coward Kevin is terrified of being called as a witness to a Jan 6 commission, where he'd be asked by Dems what he and the Chief Seditionist chatted about on the day.

Yes, McQarthy is very implicated in that and has all the incentive in the world to bury any prospect of accountability for Jan 6. At the very least he will keep pretending it was all one big nothingburger. The Rs went all in on trump and like I've said many times they are way beyond the event horizon now. It's of course very problematic for the country that whereas before trump stood out as the chief liar and crook on the right, now most of the party is happily filling his shoes. In the GQP it's a mix of Q anon nuts (especially the newly elected ones), those who crimed with trump and need to keep the lies going to shield themselves (e.g. McQarthy, Gaetz, Nunes), and those who stood by, supported all trump policies, and did nothing to confront the issues or speak out when it counted (the RINOs). The deplorables as HRC put it.

It's less that McCarthy is implicated so much as that he'd have to say 'yes, I called Trump to call off his goons and Trump said eh whatever maybe good luck shoulda been more Trumpy I'll see you later unless the magas get you first.'

McC would have to admit that the attackers were trumpists and trump refused to help.

Number of immigrant children in Border Patrol custody down 80+% last Thursday, compared to a month earlier.

NOT a permanent crisis.

I don't really get the terror. Not ideal, but hard to see terror. We all know 2 things:

1) Lots of Trumpers have said very bad things about Trump in the past.

2) If they subsequently pledge allegiance to him, everything seems to be fine.

Trump and the Trumpers know how McCarthy described 6 Jan. And OK, maybe they'll have to be reminded of it again during a hearing. Not ideal. But what will it really change?

present, m.s. wrote:

Number of immigrant children in Border Patrol custody down 80+% last Thursday, compared to a month earlier.

NOT a permanent crisis.

Yes. They moved them from border patrol to hhs . But you knew that. They are all still there and the numbers continue to grow. 👎👎👎🤡💤🥊👌🍗

Why aren’t any of you concerned about the $10 trillion in additional spending (infrastructure and budget increases) on top of $5.3 trillion spent on Covid recovery? That’s the only issue you should be focusing on, as it will effect you more than any other policy.

😂😂😂😂😂

https://www.foxnews.com/media/nbc-knocked-report-low-expectations-biden-opening-schools

present, m.s. wrote:

Number of immigrant children in Border Patrol custody down 80+% last Thursday, compared to a month earlier.

NOT a permanent crisis.

another trump crisis fixed. thanks biden

nonequals wrote:

agip wrote:

It's less that McCarthy is implicated so much as that he'd have to say 'yes, I called Trump to call off his goons and Trump said eh whatever maybe good luck shoulda been more Trumpy I'll see you later unless the magas get you first.'

McC would have to admit that the attackers were trumpists and trump refused to help.

I don't really get the terror. Not ideal, but hard to see terror. We all know 2 things:

1) Lots of Trumpers have said very bad things about Trump in the past.

2) If they subsequently pledge allegiance to him, everything seems to be fine.

Trump and the Trumpers know how McCarthy described 6 Jan. And OK, maybe they'll have to be reminded of it again during a hearing. Not ideal. But what will it really change?

your power in DC, if you are a Republican, depends on how Trump treats you.

look at cheney. She is on the outs with Trump, so she loses her leadership position and probably her seat in congress next year.

look at romney. He's booed by his state GOP convention and probably has bodyguards.

look at anyone named Bush. Totally personal non grata.

Look at Pence. He's trying real hard to get back into magaworld but trump keeps pushing him away and making him the scapegoat. That has to hurt his future in politics.

But you are right - if you are willing to kiss the ring, trump will forgive a lot.

I guess some of this depends on how many GOPers really think it was antifa and not trumpists who seditioned the capitol. Probably most think it was MS-13, antifa and the US Socialist Party.

I don't know what the rubes think and I never will.

AlohaState wrote:

Why aren’t any of you concerned about the $10 trillion in additional spending (infrastructure and budget increases) on top of $5.3 trillion spent on Covid recovery? That’s the only issue you should be focusing on, as it will effect you more than any other policy.

The Covid "recovery" bill had the majority of it spent on expansions of liberal programs. It was more a pork bill than a Covid recovery bill

The "infrastructure" bill is again a big lie by Biden and Liberals. Please pay attention to the following: Only 1/20 or 5% is slated for actual infrastructure stuff like bridges and highways. 25% or 1/4 is slated for phony-baloney Global Warming crap ... I e., we are throwing the money down the crapper. The Liberals in Congress are about as dishonest of anyone in history. Really reprehensible people. Just a shame.

Sally Vix wrote:

AlohaState wrote:

Why aren’t any of you concerned about the $10 trillion in additional spending (infrastructure and budget increases) on top of $5.3 trillion spent on Covid recovery? That’s the only issue you should be focusing on, as it will effect you more than any other policy.

The Covid "recovery" bill had the majority of it spent on expansions of liberal programs. It was more a pork bill than a Covid recovery bill

The "infrastructure" bill is again a big lie by Biden and Liberals. Please pay attention to the following: Only 1/20 or 5% is slated for actual infrastructure stuff like bridges and highways. 25% or 1/4 is slated for phony-baloney Global Warming crap ... I e., we are throwing the money down the crapper. The Liberals in Congress are about as dishonest of anyone in history. Really reprehensible people. Just a shame.

Maybe you are just stuck in a 50s definition of infrastructure. Besides, the guy is actually trying to address stuff like clean drinking water which everyone assumes we already have. You should be happy we now have a president who gives a crap.

Trollminator wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

The Covid "recovery" bill had the majority of it spent on expansions of liberal programs. It was more a pork bill than a Covid recovery bill

The "infrastructure" bill is again a big lie by Biden and Liberals. Please pay attention to the following: Only 1/20 or 5% is slated for actual infrastructure stuff like bridges and highways. 25% or 1/4 is slated for phony-baloney Global Warming crap ... I e., we are throwing the money down the crapper. The Liberals in Congress are about as dishonest of anyone in history. Really reprehensible people. Just a shame.

Maybe you are just stuck in a 50s definition of infrastructure. Besides, the guy is actually trying to address stuff like clean drinking water which everyone assumes we already have. You should be happy we now have a president who gives a crap.

Just note that calling it an infrastructure bill isn't quite true. Dems shouldn't be doing that.

It's mostly Repubs who call it that.

It's called the American Jobs Bill. Because it isn't meant to be just infrastructure. It's about building the lower and middle class up so they can power the economy.

Trollminator wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

The Covid "recovery" bill had the majority of it spent on expansions of liberal programs. It was more a pork bill than a Covid recovery bill

The "infrastructure" bill is again a big lie by Biden and Liberals. Please pay attention to the following: Only 1/20 or 5% is slated for actual infrastructure stuff like bridges and highways. 25% or 1/4 is slated for phony-baloney Global Warming crap ... I e., we are throwing the money down the crapper. The Liberals in Congress are about as dishonest of anyone in history. Really reprehensible people. Just a shame.

Maybe you are just stuck in a 50s definition of infrastructure. Besides, the guy is actually trying to address stuff like clean drinking water which everyone assumes we already have. You should be happy we now have a president who gives a crap.

Perhaps I AM stuck back in the 50s - maybe even the 30s but this is what Oxford Languages define as infrastructure CURRENTLY:

the basic physical and organizational structures and facilities (e.g. buildings, roads, power supplies) needed for the operation of a society or enterprise.

"the social and economic infrastructure of a country"

No mention of expansions of liberal pork projects, no mentions of increasing the salaries of liberal administrators, no mention of HALF OF TRILLION for Global Warming crap, no mention ....