Did ProPublica ever investigate this? Did they pay for these all out of pocket on their justice salary? Agip? Trollminator? Bueller?
-
32
-
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
You do the crime do the time
Unless you're a Democrat or in Antifa.
Or Hunter and Joe Biden. Or leaving a boatload of cocaine in the White House.
32 -
Whatever his condition was, if you point a loaded gun at someone when they come to serve a warrant then every option is on the table to respond to that threat.
But lets wait for the cam before jumping to conclusions.
10 -
JustWonderingAloud wrote:
Whatever his condition was, if you point a loaded gun at someone when they come to serve a warrant then every option is on the table to respond to that threat.
But lets wait for the cam before jumping to conclusions.
Yes that's why they kicked his door in at 6am. It's easy to arrange an execution if you're the FBI.
10 -
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
JustWonderingAloud wrote:
Whatever his condition was, if you point a loaded gun at someone when they come to serve a warrant then every option is on the table to respond to that threat.
But lets wait for the cam before jumping to conclusions.
Yes that's why they kicked his door in at 6am. It's easy to arrange an execution if you're the FBI.
If this idiot was black he'd be a Democrat folk hero like Breonna Taylor.
31 -
Sally Vix wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
If you don't like law and order you too can get lost
If you love law and order why were you not saying the crazies protesting outside of the Supreme Court justices' homes should be arrested and charged with crimes?
Who?
02 -
Sally Vix wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Unless you're a Democrat or in Antifa.
Or Hunter and Joe Biden. Or leaving a boatload of cocaine in the White House.
Cry harder for all the things on your list of things that didn't happen
03 -
Academic Discussion wrote:
Did ProPublica ever investigate this? Did they pay for these all out of pocket on their justice salary? Agip? Trollminator? Bueller?
Are you aware of any other justice with such glaring ethical abuses? If so please share your info with the wacko right wing people you follow. Maybe they can get to the bottom of it.
14 -
Trollminator wrote:
Academic Discussion wrote:
Did ProPublica ever investigate this? Did they pay for these all out of pocket on their justice salary? Agip? Trollminator? Bueller?
Are you aware of any other justice with such glaring ethical abuses? If so please share your info with the wacko right wing people you follow. Maybe they can get to the bottom of it.
You're like a toddler with your eyes closed and sticky fingers jammed in your ears...
21 -
Remind me, when will Biden get impeached or indicted again? 😆
02 -
Meanwhile Mowaiu burns like cinder cakes due to the liberal's ecological policies and woke arsonist ideology.
10 -
Academic Discussion wrote:
Did ProPublica ever investigate this? Did they pay for these all out of pocket on their justice salary? Agip? Trollminator? Bueller?
show me some good, quality journalism that makes Ginsburg etc roughly equal to Thomas and we'll talk.
And why won't you just condemn them all? I sure would if they did similar things. Note how dems turned on Andrew Cuomo, Al Franken, Bill Clinton when dirt came out. Whereas when dirt comes out on Rs they clap and shout 'make the lib ethicists cry more!'
In any case, I'm all for tighter ethics rules for SCOTUS. Rs are rarely for ethics rules. They hate ethics rules. That's one reason they vote for trump - they appreciate his lack of ethics and see it as a conservative value.
13 -
Trollminator wrote:
Remind me, when will Biden get impeached or indicted again? 😆
The corrupt DoJ wouldn't indict Biden if he killed and gutted a baby on the White House lawn.
He will be impeached before the 2024 election.
01 -
agip wrote:
Academic Discussion wrote:
Did ProPublica ever investigate this? Did they pay for these all out of pocket on their justice salary? Agip? Trollminator? Bueller?
show me some good, quality journalism that makes Ginsburg etc roughly equal to Thomas and we'll talk.
And why won't you just condemn them all? I sure would if they did similar things. Note how dems turned on Andrew Cuomo, Al Franken, Bill Clinton when dirt came out. Whereas when dirt comes out on Rs they clap and shout 'make the lib ethicists cry more!'
In any case, I'm all for tighter ethics rules for SCOTUS. Rs are rarely for ethics rules. They hate ethics rules. That's one reason they vote for trump - they appreciate his lack of ethics and see it as a conservative value.
Were you calling for tighter ethics rules when Steve Bryer and RBG were making all those overseas trips? Of course not, you only attack conservatives.
41 -
agip wrote:
Academic Discussion wrote:
Did ProPublica ever investigate this? Did they pay for these all out of pocket on their justice salary? Agip? Trollminator? Bueller?
show me some good, quality journalism that makes Ginsburg etc roughly equal to Thomas and we'll talk.
And why won't you just condemn them all? I sure would if they did similar things. Note how dems turned on Andrew Cuomo, Al Franken, Bill Clinton when dirt came out. Whereas when dirt comes out on Rs they clap and shout 'make the lib ethicists cry more!'
In any case, I'm all for tighter ethics rules for SCOTUS. Rs are rarely for ethics rules. They hate ethics rules. That's one reason they vote for trump - they appreciate his lack of ethics and see it as a conservative value.
157 (RBG) is more than 108 (Thomas).
I don't condemn any of them because I don't have a problem with any of them. It's clear they all have their ideology and not one of these has ever appeared to affect a court case.
Democrats never turned on Bill Clinton. They only "turn on" their own when they can appoint a Democrat replacement without an election.
20 -
Academic Discussion wrote:
agip wrote:
show me some good, quality journalism that makes Ginsburg etc roughly equal to Thomas and we'll talk.
And why won't you just condemn them all? I sure would if they did similar things. Note how dems turned on Andrew Cuomo, Al Franken, Bill Clinton when dirt came out. Whereas when dirt comes out on Rs they clap and shout 'make the lib ethicists cry more!'
In any case, I'm all for tighter ethics rules for SCOTUS. Rs are rarely for ethics rules. They hate ethics rules. That's one reason they vote for trump - they appreciate his lack of ethics and see it as a conservative value.
157 (RBG) is more than 108 (Thomas).
I don't condemn any of them because I don't have a problem with any of them. It's clear they all have their ideology and not one of these has ever appeared to affect a court case.
Democrats never turned on Bill Clinton. They only "turn on" their own when they can appoint a Democrat replacement without an election.
ok so mark it that you have no problem with hundreds of thousands of dollars of unreported funds being given to SCOTUS justices from highly politico types.
Got it.
No idea how or why you came to the conclusion that ethics rules are bad, but I guess that comes with being a Republican and seeing the GOP Crime Blotter every day revealing the awfulness of American conservatives.
But seriously. Your stance against ethics is indefensible.
02 -
Sally Vix wrote:
agip wrote:
show me some good, quality journalism that makes Ginsburg etc roughly equal to Thomas and we'll talk.
And why won't you just condemn them all? I sure would if they did similar things. Note how dems turned on Andrew Cuomo, Al Franken, Bill Clinton when dirt came out. Whereas when dirt comes out on Rs they clap and shout 'make the lib ethicists cry more!'
In any case, I'm all for tighter ethics rules for SCOTUS. Rs are rarely for ethics rules. They hate ethics rules. That's one reason they vote for trump - they appreciate his lack of ethics and see it as a conservative value.
Were you calling for tighter ethics rules when Steve Bryer and RBG were making all those overseas trips? Of course not, you only attack conservatives.
If I read good journalism saying Breyer or RBG did something wrong I will certainly call them out. 100%. This is not hard. This should be easy for us all. Ask yourself why it is not easy for you.
This post was edited 9 minutes after it was posted.12 -
Trollminator wrote:
agip wrote:
Bribes given to ‘conservative’ Supreme Court Justice John Thomas and you morans don’t care. What you do care about is Hunter Biden. Tools. Utter tools.
Propublica:
At least 38 destination vacations, including a previously unreported voyage on a yacht around the Bahamas; 26 private jet flights, plus an additional eight by helicopter; a dozen VIP passes to professional and college sporting events, typically perched in the skybox; two stays at luxury resorts in Florida and Jamaica; and one standing invitation to an uber-exclusive golf club overlooking the Atlantic coast.
No way! He has always claimed he prefers RVs and walmart parking lots... a simple conservative
RV? You mean, his "Rolls-Royce of motor coaches”? Who paid for it?
12 -
agip wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Were you calling for tighter ethics rules when Steve Bryer and RBG were making all those overseas trips? Of course not, you only attack conservatives.
If I read good journalism saying Breyer or RBG did something wrong I will certainly call them out. 100%. This is not hard. This should be easy for us all. Ask yourself why it is not easy for you.
By YOUR standard, every single one of these is corruption:
20 -
Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
No way! He has always claimed he prefers RVs and walmart parking lots... a simple conservative
RV? You mean, his "Rolls-Royce of motor coaches”? Who paid for it?
Shut up, racist.
11
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.