Viking21 wrote:
sustainable earth wrote:
The radical idea is respectfully tell your school coach the truth and pursue private coaching irrespective of how it is received. If they try to ban you from participating in meets, go to the Athletic Director and complain. If they continue to block you from your right to participate in the meet as a high school athlete, go to the board of education, superintendent and local body overseeing state high school athletics. Welcome.
Alternately, you could just show up for practice every day just like all of the other athletes, thus saving yourself the trouble of tilting at windmills. Is there a set mark at a particular distance that exempts an athlete from following team rules, or is it entirely at the discretion of a private "coach" who likely has no concept of the realities of running a high school team?
No set mark and no particular distance for exemption. And no, it is entirely at the discretion of the individual involved. If I want to pay for supplementary side coaching who are you to tell me no? The difference in this country is that high school sports are paid for by residents who pay taxes and fund salaries of administrators, coaches and... yes, board members overseeing those high school sports. Now, if you want to argue the merits of whether the US should move to a more European set-up of club sports where the parent pays for entry on a specific team with a coach of their choosing, we can. But, as I'm sure you understand, the current system requires my tax money to operate but provides me with zero alternatives and zero flexibility. if we moved to a club sport set up, that would mean fewer coaching positions in general because anyone with talent will be vying for slots on competitive teams with talented coaches and the untalented would not bother spending their money on a crappy team.