Every moment a hi-lite wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-Zm0K0YzxE
Where's Wohl's mommy?
Another non-news watcher wrote:
The accuser's name is Carolyne Cass of Cass Fashion.
Fearing for her life, she took a plane out of DC before the news conference revealed her name.
Those bussed-in Antifa mobs/npcs (funded by Soros money) scared her off... ?
Credible, corroborated claims are not allowed against your deep state overlords. An investigation will happen but we will turn the tables and investigate you.
LOL! Proven liars get caught in the middle of a scam. Instead of running for cover and lawyers, they are pushing forward because they've confused their sociopathy for strategic genius. This is the best story ever.
The "credible" witness they had didn't show. She claims that the fact that the press was invited to a press conference made her fearful for her life. But for some reason she was okay with Jacob giving out her name anyway. Unforuntely, Wohl and Burkman could not agree on how her name is actually spelled.
Wohl accused Mueller of "leaking" proof that he had jury duty in DC on the day the woman he is paying to make these claims said it happened. That proof is in a Washington Post story that anyone can google. Wohl and Burkman maintain that Mueller is magic and managed to be in two places at once, saying "sometimes people go to jury duty but they're also somewhere else."
Wohl referred to Surefire Intelligence as "my company" even though he'd repeatedly denied that he had anything to do with it. Then says he lied to preserve his anonymity.
Wohl claimed that antifa had been bused in to disrupt their little press conference, but there was no one there.
The story Wohl told about how the woman had been raped conflicted with the accusatory documents he produced for the occasion (which have already been debunked).
According to Jack Burkman, Jacob Wohl, whose incompetence and shameless lying got him a lifetime ban from securities trading as a teenager, "is a child prodigy who has eclipsed Mozart." (According to reporters who were there, Burkman left his fly unzipped for the entire press conference.)
None of this is a joke! And here's something to keep in mind from one of the reporters who broke the original story about Wohl attempting to bribe women to come forward with stories:
data watcher wrote:
Curiously, the FBI.gov "press release" page is suddenly turning up EMPTY searches from 2010 press releases, like those that described Mueller's visit to NYC at the time when he raped Miss Cass.
Fortunately, the press conference had hard copies, so that the Internet memory hole deletion trick (as seen in so many other coverups, like Comey, McCabe, HRC) won't work here.
It's still not clear whether the Aug 2 date is accurate and he travelled up to NYC after his "jury duty" (clearly a photo-op virtue-signalling issue, as he was immediately excused, obviously, for being in law enforcement).
Exactly, no end to the rabbit holes that exist when Deep State is involved.
data watcher wrote:
Curiously, the FBI.gov "press release" page is suddenly turning up EMPTY searches from 2010 press releases, like those that described Mueller's visit to NYC at the time when he raped Miss Cass.
.
"The complete absence of evidence that Mueller traveled to NYC on the date in question proves that he was there and it's been covered up!!!"
You guys can't get any dumber.
The Gallant Pig Man wrote:
data watcher wrote:
Curiously, the FBI.gov "press release" page is suddenly turning up EMPTY searches from 2010 press releases, like those that described Mueller's visit to NYC at the time when he raped Miss Cass.
.
"The complete absence of evidence that Mueller traveled to NYC on the date in question proves that he was there and it's been covered up!!!"
You guys can't get any dumber.
Explain to me again the actual FBI press release (NYC office) detailing Mueller's visit (2010), or do such actual facts just not exist in your world because they are too inconvenient? So why is this exact press release (distributed at press conference) not available online Internet, when the search mechanism goes back to 2010? When such obvious discrepancies are roundly denoted "conspiracy theories" by establishment media (MSM), you can see why no one trusts the self-chosen gate-keepers anymore, to do their so-called "investigative reporting" only when it leads to their preformed conclusion.
BTW, there is no (specific) "date in question", as the victim (Carolyne Cass) attested that it was "on or about" (actual words). Of/c MSM crazies immediately latch on to "August 2" and exaggerate this importance, just as they always do in their attempts to coverup.
Another non-news watcher wrote:
The accuser's name is Carolyne Cass of Cass Fashion.
Fearing for her life, she took a plane out of DC before the news conference revealed her name.
The whole Carolyne Cass story has been out there for a couple hours now, and lazy MSM can't even be bothered to verify her story. They just call her lawyer/agents conspiracy nutters, and ignore them. How differently were leftist darlings treated just a month ago... So much for their pious moralizings in other events!
Literally on social media
Would like to thank my world class representation, @Jack_Burkman and @JacobAWohl , they are both geniuses and treating this matter in a serious and sensitive manner
I don't mind being dehumanized on the internet, as long as no one photoshops me into a corn costume!
If you've ever chanted "Believe All Women" or "We Believe Survivors", where is your support now?
Members of the media: Please stop attempting to reach me or members of my family. We would appreciate respect for our privacy during this difficult time.
@CassCarolyne
People kept asking me to create a twitter account so here it is! I have no comments on the Mueller accusation at this time.
Self-described genius wrote:
Literally on social media
Heh.
@CassCarolyne
LA Fashionista. Well-renowned designer that has studied at some of the top fashion schools in the world. This is a parody account.
http://twitter.com/CassCarolyneThis is actually just the first woman who will accuse Mueller from these genius representations.They will get more preposterous as time progresses, such as the who claims she went to multiple parties where FBI agents led by Mueller gang-raped her repeatedly.
So the accuser just happens to be a client of a non-existent company at identically the same time she saw Mueller on TV. Even if she really was a client the odds are millions to one. And then, instead of contacting a high profile attorney, she has two absolute morans represent her.
And then there is the affidavit:
He said he is a cop and she lets him buy her a drink. She quickly tires of him and moves down a seat to get away from him. He follows her and claims to work for the FBI which proves he lied about being a cop. She now knows he is a liar, but still believes he is a powerful man with the FBI. Although she can leave or tell him to F-off at anytime, she is now powerless to resist following him to his room.
She obediently lies on the bed, he checks the weather, she yells at him to stop and then he rapes her. He is so confident of his power over her that he risks destroying an extremely successful career by unloading a wad of DNA. Not only is he evil; he's an idiot as well.
Her story is ridiculous and it was no surprise that she didn't show up today.
. He follows her and claims to work for the FBI which proves he lied about being a cop. She now knows he is a liar, but still believes he is a powerful man with the FBI.
Yes, because everyone immediately knows that FBI agents aren't "cops", even though Hollywood itself often refers to them as such.
Seriously, this is the best you've got to "dispel" her torrid story, complete with all its lurid details?
straw grasping wrote:
. He follows her and claims to work for the FBI which proves he lied about being a cop. She now knows he is a liar, but still believes he is a powerful man with the FBI.
Yes, because everyone immediately knows that FBI agents aren't "cops", even though Hollywood itself often refers to them as such.
Seriously, this is the best you've got to "dispel" her torrid story, complete with all its lurid details?
It just shows how far some ppl will go to find "ticky-tack" details that don't fit their self-made impressions, even when they lapdog up the bizarro story of CBF that was openly acclaimed by so many (including in so-called "rightwing" media).
They are just looking for an excuse to bury the story, not to find truth. Every investigation has some loose-ends that don't seem right at first, if they didn't you'd know the whole thing was re-hearsed anyway.
Why is Surefire Intelligence denoted an LLC (International Private Intelligence), rather than incorporated in USA?
Fear of reprisials? Is there a sinister foreign element?
He is so confident of his power over her that he risks destroying an extremely successful career by unloading a wad of DNA. Not only is he evil; he's an idiot as well.
When you grow up and learn about real-world power structures, trying posting again.
Why do you think Harvey Weinstein was "an idiot" as well? He knew how the real power worked. No "DNA evidence" would make it past his "friends" (including Mossad on some occasions) or whoever he had going for him that day. If a Hollywood flunkie has such power to silence, imagine (just try, I know from our own experience you have no concept) how a 25yo woman when raped by head of FBI is going to act. Psychologically, there's NO CHANCE of recriminations. He knows it, she knows it. Until #MeToo started outing these rapists there was largely silence IN GENERAL, all the more so in this case where it was someone "you don't say know to" as Mueller was here.
Being assaulted by those in power is VERY threatening (cf. Juanita Broaddrick, among other WJC liaisons). Mocking the victims is totally uncalled for.
Gross sexperved corruption at the head of the FBI? Coverups of the various heinous crimes they commit by other law enforcement, local and otherwise? Threats against those who would accuse them from speaking out?
I'm SHOCKED, literally SHOCKED, to find this out!
Russkie Me wrote:
Why is Surefire Intelligence denoted an LLC (International Private Intelligence), rather than incorporated in USA?
Fear of reprisials? Is there a sinister foreign element?
No, LLCs are now available in USA. But it's "organized", not incorporated.
http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/limited-liability-company-llchttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limited_liability_company