After seeing this, I wouldn't let my child go to the Youth Olympics even if they qualified.
After seeing this, I wouldn't let my child go to the Youth Olympics even if they qualified.
I wouldn't let my childs go if I had any either. They are there to run not mess around and be reckless.
Banana Bread wrote:
I wouldn't let my childs go if I had any either. They are there to run not mess around and be reckless.
Well, fortunately for humanity, you never will.
eeeasy peasy wrote:
After seeing this, I wouldn't let my child go to the Youth Olympics even if they qualified.
Which only goes to show that you have zero confidence in the quality of your own parenting. Frankly, I agree with you on that.
STSBO wrote:
eeeasy peasy wrote:
After seeing this, I wouldn't let my child go to the Youth Olympics even if they qualified.
Which only goes to show that you have zero confidence in the quality of your own parenting. Frankly, I agree with you on that.
No, I have zero confidence in the quality of other people's parenting. Like yours, for example.
With our morals, your mother wouldn't have been born.
Banana Bread wrote:
Maybe I just have more morals I guess. I have never used one and would never degrade myself. I'm sure Bekele wouldn't. He is married and wouldn't go around to random people in the Olympic village evan though I'm sure they would want him. Surely other people here have ethics
With your morals, your mother and you wouldn't have been born. For every kid born, there's a mother who once had her feet up in the air. Just life.
Your grandmother wrote:
With our morals, your mother wouldn't have been born.
Banana Bread wrote:
Maybe I just have more morals I guess. I have never used one and would never degrade myself. I'm sure Bekele wouldn't. He is married and wouldn't go around to random people in the Olympic village evan though I'm sure they would want him. Surely other people here have ethics
eeasy peasy wrote:
STSBO wrote:
Which only goes to show that you have zero confidence in the quality of your own parenting. Frankly, I agree with you on that.
No, I have zero confidence in the quality of other people's parenting. Like yours, for example.
So you're saying you'll raise kids that can't resist peer pressure?
eeasy peasy wrote:
STSBO wrote:
Which only goes to show that you have zero confidence in the quality of your own parenting. Frankly, I agree with you on that.
No, I have zero confidence in the quality of other people's parenting. Like yours, for example.
In case you were not aware, it takes two to tango. Unless you are talking about rape then any sex act that might be engaged in would involve your offspring's own choice in the matter.
As I said, your earlier post only goes to show that you have zero confidence in the quality of your own parenting. Frankly, I still agree with you on that.
STSBO wrote:
eeasy peasy wrote:
No, I have zero confidence in the quality of other people's parenting. Like yours, for example.
In case you were not aware, it takes two to tango. Unless you are talking about rape then any sex act that might be engaged in would involve your offspring's own choice in the matter.
As I said, your earlier post only goes to show that you have zero confidence in the quality of your own parenting. Frankly, I still agree with you on that.
No need to get hostile, dude. If you want your children to frequent dens of iniquity under the guise of competing for the US, go for it.
comedyrelief wrote:
What is peoples fascination with the number of condoms they give out at sporting events (and really why do they have to give them away, people should buy their own)? They don't publicize how much toilet paper they go through, how much soap and shampoo they use or how many bottles of water they go through. Just more horse crap from the big latex lobby.
If there were people who didn't use toilet paper, because "it doesn't feel good" it would be given out for free and there would be campaigns about it. I don't think this happens so much with toilet paper, but in countries like India there are campaigns to get people to use toilets (especially in rural places) instead of just using fields.
It was probably partially a financial choice to get so many. Likely 10,000 was $X and 144,000 was $X times 2.
Spare me the puritan moral crap. Why can't you live your life and let others live theirs without loudly judging everyone for not being just like you? Even if they were, you would probably find some way to denigrate others to try to elevate yourself. It just makes you sound pitiful.
Anyone who has coached H.S. sports know that when you stay overnight at an event, keeping the sexes separated is always a concern. Btw, this is not just an issue for the boys, but girls can tend to get a little out of character at events.
messi wrote:
Banana Bread wrote:
You mad bro? Your the disgusting one. If these people can easily get up to such unethical debauchery then it is likely they would dope without hesitation. I would never act that way if I was in the village.
Age of consent in Argentina is 13, so yeah, provide condoms.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_South_America
God, to be a coach at this event.
pipe layer wrote:
Subway Surfers wrote:
That is a lot of sex. Too exhausted to compete.
Obviously you were never 18.
Yes I was once young and virile but 40 condoms in two weeks. That's a lot of effort.
Subway Surfers wrote:
pipe layer wrote:
Obviously you were never 18.
Yes I was once young and virile but 40 condoms in two weeks. That's a lot of effort.
If only it were possible to take them home and store them for use later.
eeasy peasy wrote:
STSBO wrote:
Which only goes to show that you have zero confidence in the quality of your own parenting. Frankly, I agree with you on that.
No, I have zero confidence in the quality of other people's parenting. Like yours, for example.
So, your parenting style has you teaching your kids to raw dawg it like the POTUS? Is that it? Because you know abstinence is a myth created by delusional folks that believe in a magic sky wizard, right? It’s well documented in the peer reviewed literature that the majority of people in the US (girls and boys) have been having premarital sex even if you go back to people born in the 20s and 30s. The rates among even those geezers was over 90% having got it on before marriage.
You should really teach your kids to wrap it up bro. Otherwise you’ll wind up with a kid like Bristol Palin—who was taught abstinence only and then got knock up TWICE before marriage because she decided to raw dawg in like the POTUS.
Raw Dawg it like the POTUS!?! wrote:
eeasy peasy wrote:
No, I have zero confidence in the quality of other people's parenting. Like yours, for example.
So, your parenting style has you teaching your kids to raw dawg it like the POTUS? Is that it? Because you know abstinence is a myth created by delusional folks that believe in a magic sky wizard, right? It’s well documented in the peer reviewed literature that the majority of people in the US (girls and boys) have been having premarital sex even if you go back to people born in the 20s and 30s. The rates among even those geezers was over 90% having got it on before marriage.
You should really teach your kids to wrap it up bro. Otherwise you’ll wind up with a kid like Bristol Palin—who was taught abstinence only and then got knock up TWICE before marriage because she decided to raw dawg in like the POTUS.
Um, I don't presume to speak on behalf of eeasy peasy. But, he very well may be intending to keep his children away from heathens who condone gratifying their every impulse. Premarital sex with someone you know well is very different from premarital sex with someone you just met at the Olympic village. And your vulgar description of sex likely makes you a perfect example of someone who he likely is trying to shield his children from.
Banana Bread wrote:
If I was in charge of the IAF I would ban this from the Olympic Village. Promiscuous and debauchery people don't deserve to be in the Olympics and I wouldn't be a fan of anyone who excepted a condom. I would hand it back. What ever happened to waiting for your soulmate and marriage? It is sick that the IAAF would allow and encourage people to act this way. What a joke.
Is this a serious post?
Also, improve your grammar. Until then, you are not likely to be put "in charge of the IAF" or anything else.
eeeasy peasy wrote:
After seeing this, I wouldn't let my child go to the Youth Olympics even if they qualified.
If your kid is over the age of 12, you're doing them a favor by teaching them about safe sex and condoms. But yeah, just see if they don't become a statistic as a result of abstinence-only stance by puritanical parenting.