July 30 - August 5
Sunday 7.04 @6:52
Monday 7.07 @6:47
Tuesday 6.00 @7:18
Wednesday 7.00 @6:51
Thursday 6.01 @6:51
Friday 7.1 @6:50
Saturday 10.1 @6:47
Weekly total 50.32mi
July 30 - August 5
Sunday 7.04 @6:52
Monday 7.07 @6:47
Tuesday 6.00 @7:18
Wednesday 7.00 @6:51
Thursday 6.01 @6:51
Friday 7.1 @6:50
Saturday 10.1 @6:47
Weekly total 50.32mi
Hey guys
I'm just looking for some feedback on whether I should drop my mileage when racing starts or continue and start to drop when states come around.
Thanks for any input.
alabama runner wrote:
J.S., I have ragged on you before, but now that I understand what you're talking about, I understand your ideas and apologize for my earlier comments. I was really just annoyed at how Island thinks you're a god when in my opinion there are glaring flaws with some of the things that you have posted.
1)Easy runs is the same and should be done at about 65-80 % of MHR. Steady running where the runner improves aerob capacity and at same time recovers from the quality work .
2) Long runs differs a little. Same princip that the long run should not be only slow....but....in DANCAN the long run mostly is done at the easy pace and finish at LT-pace in intervals or sustained fast run.
3) That you should need more easy days then one between quality work is only true if the quality is really demanding for example in a repetition workout at race pace 800m/ 1500m/3000m. The runner needs 48 - 72 hours recovery between quality workouts.
4) In Canova`s system there is no scheduled rest days but in DANCAN-system there is always one scheduled restday in the week where the runner recharge "batteries" to 100%.
5) Canova`s system is a phase-system that goes from slower to faster runs over the periods. DANCAN is not. In DANCAN the runner improves at the 3 most important factors for the result every week year around in a well mixed balance. Same as in the Canova system is that every run has a special purpose. The exact control of the runs have highest priority.
6) Injury? In the Canova system there is a philosophy about that you got to do high mileage to back up or prepare for the quality work and that means also a higher risk of overtraining or injury. In DANCAN the mileage is fairly low and only enough to back up the quality.
Good luck with your training !
And remember....Train, don`t strain.....or .....Less is more.
Point 1, we are in agreement. Point 2, your idea is probably best for new runners. For experienced runners who have developed a large base over the years, they should do the vast majority of the long runs fast. Point 3, you are probably right, but some HS runners have trouble with long steady runs, so it's best to take recovery like it's a workout. Point 4, you are right, but I modified it because infrequent scheduled rest days are good in my opinion. Point 5, Canova starts at high and low ends of race pace, and then slowly converges on race pace. Basically improving multiple factors of race readiness and then making them more and more relevant to the race as the season progresses. I will look into your DANCAN system. Point 6, In my experience, myself and my teammates have become injured when they did speedwork without the base to support it. People get injured from quality, not quantity, unless the quantity is ridiculous, or there is both quality and quantity. I would advise the runner to have lots of QUANTITY in the base/fundamental period, and then decrease steadily until the specific period. To second that, I agree that less is more, but in the quality running. You need a base with quantity.
"mystic summer" ~~alabama runner~~
Just some comments again... :) Point 2, My experience from the training of all my runners shows that even the experienced runners with a large base over the years improves best with my specifik long run with only a shorter part of fast finish in the run. A couple of my new runners are very experienced with f.ex 59.56 at half and the other one 13.28 at 5 k (high altitude ) . Both tells that the new training system they are on feels so relaxed and perfect calibrated and is something they have never felt before. One of them did 10 x 1600m LT-intervals at close to 4.32min some days ago and told it was not hard ,just relaxing pace.
Just add that most runners don`t get injured from quality and quantity if they are right performed in intensity and amount.
Speeeeeed wrote:
You have absolutely no speed
He has more speed than me and I've run 15:30.
You are doing your easy steady runs too fast. All that 6xx miling will end up stalling your development. Trust me I did the same mistake you improve then suddenly plateau or worse get injured
Where is your weekly long run- 10 miles
You goal of sub 16 is achievable though.
Mixing up long run and Intervals is nonsese. Elites only do some of this to cope with race surges at the front.
Long run is classed as s hard session. Doing Intervals at end when tired will less to injury.
If your athletes threshold was really 4:32 pace they'd be sub 60 for half marathon. You don't know what effort they are putting in as you are 'coaching' them online.
ukathleticscoach wrote:
Mixing up long run and Intervals is nonsese. Elites only do some of this to cope with race surges at the front.
Long run is classed as s hard session. Doing Intervals at end when tired will less to injury.
If your athletes threshold was really 4:32 pace they'd be sub 60 for half marathon. You don't know what effort they are putting in as you are 'coaching' them online.
That "nonsense" has so far given 9 international winners in 2,5 years time and a 2.07.38 marathon win in Valencia last year ........my elites do this stuff to be able to stand the surges that will occur in the later stages of a half or marathon, also be able to pick up pace when tired.
In contrary to your theories this is very effective and have so far not given more injuries than normal.
Didn`t I tell the guy running 4.32 pace at 10 x 1600m already is a sub 60 min runner?
Totally forgot about this thread but if anyone’s interested I did end up having a pretty good year and running 15:54
Congrats!
Do you mind sharing your general workouts, macro cycles, mileage, etc?