D = Denial/Delusion/Dumb wrote:
No, it's all related... you just live in denial.
No it's not related. Thanks for playing. Grown-ups are talking here.
D = Denial/Delusion/Dumb wrote:
No, it's all related... you just live in denial.
No it's not related. Thanks for playing. Grown-ups are talking here.
Grown ups... in this political BS environment?
You = delusional
Trump has not rescinded his demand to Russia to hack Clinton's emails.
trump don't backtrack wrote:
Trump has not rescinded his demand to Russia to hack Clinton's emails.
Of course, he never admits he's wrong about anything, although he is proven wrong day in and day out.
A great leader admits it when he is wrong. An egomaniac cannot admit he is wrong.
trump don't backtrack wrote:
Trump has not rescinded his demand to Russia to hack Clinton's emails.
The liberal outrage over this is blowing my mind. Are you guys stupid?
1) Who cares if Russia hacks Hillary's private emails from years ago? She says she only deleted the personal ones. So if the 30,000 are found, they'll all be personal and nothing to worry about.
If they hacked all of her emails, and there is sensitive stuff on there, then it proves the GOP's point that she should'nt have been emailing via a private server in her basement.
2) He's making fun of the liberals for trying to make a legitimate story that should be all shameful for the DNC instead be about the Russians.
DNC staffers were aiding Hillary and questioning the religion of Bernie Sanders. The Dems want us instead to be upset wtih the Russians.
Seriously. For a minute, let's imagine the roles are reversed. Let's imagine GOP emails are uncovered and they were questioning whether Barack Obama was atheist or Christian or Muslim and they were making fun of black staffer's name. Do you think the media would care about the excuse of "Oh it doesn't matter what's in the emails because no one would know about them if the evil Russian hadn't hacked us?" No one would care about the excuse (which of course isn't proven and could just be made up).
Why does it matter who hacked the DNC emails? The DNC isn't a govt entitty. It's a private organization. I could care less if the Russians hacked it or if it was 13-year old acne filled boy. Well I take that back, the Russians could use it for blackmail. But then again, so could a 13-year old.
Ever heard of sarcasm? Trump is making fun of excuse and then the media at the same time.
I said it last week, Trump will do something outrageous to put the attention back on him during the DNC, and here it is
Funny clip
http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/07/donald-trump-to-katy-tur-be-quiet-226286
rojo wrote:
trump don't backtrack wrote:Trump has not rescinded his demand to Russia to hack Clinton's emails.
The liberal outrage over this is blowing my mind. Are you guys stupid?
1) Who cares if Russia hacks Hillary's private emails from years ago? She says she only deleted the personal ones. So if the 30,000 are found, they'll all be personal and nothing to worry about.
If they hacked all of her emails, and there is sensitive stuff on there, then it proves the GOP's point that she should'nt have been emailing via a private server in her basement.
2) He's making fun of the liberals for trying to make a legitimate story that should be all shameful for the DNC instead be about the Russians.
DNC staffers were aiding Hillary and questioning the religion of Bernie Sanders. The Dems want us instead to be upset wtih the Russians.
Seriously. For a minute, let's imagine the roles are reversed. Let's imagine GOP emails are uncovered and they were questioning whether Barack Obama was atheist or Christian or Muslim and they were making fun of black staffer's name. Do you think the media would care about the excuse of "Oh it doesn't matter what's in the emails because no one would know about them if the evil Russian hadn't hacked us?" No one would care about the excuse (which of course isn't proven and could just be made up).
Why does it matter who hacked the DNC emails? The DNC isn't a govt entitty. It's a private organization. I could care less if the Russians hacked it or if it was 13-year old acne filled boy. Well I take that back, the Russians could use it for blackmail. But then again, so could a 13-year old.
Ever heard of sarcasm? Trump is making fun of excuse and then the media at the same time.
Hey dumb dumb, the liberals I know aren't upset at the possibility of the emails being found - they are pointing out the hypocrisy of saying that Hillary jeopardized national security with her private server and then turning around and asking her emails to be distributed to everyone in the world.
"So then I says to Putin, I says..."
The oympics are coming. A few people, I am guessing Rojo and a few mods, start thread after thread about The election and only seems to care about doping if it could possibly involve NOP.
What about the sport?
rojo wrote:
trump don't backtrack wrote:Trump has not rescinded his demand to Russia to hack Clinton's emails.
The liberal outrage over this is blowing my mind. Are you guys stupid?
1) Who cares if Russia hacks Hillary's private emails from years ago? She says she only deleted the personal ones. So if the 30,000 are found, they'll all be personal and nothing to worry about.
If they hacked all of her emails, and there is sensitive stuff on there, then it proves the GOP's point that she should'nt have been emailing via a private server in her basement.
2) He's making fun of the liberals for trying to make a legitimate story that should be all shameful for the DNC instead be about the Russians.
DNC staffers were aiding Hillary and questioning the religion of Bernie Sanders. The Dems want us instead to be upset wtih the Russians.
Seriously. For a minute, let's imagine the roles are reversed. Let's imagine GOP emails are uncovered and they were questioning whether Barack Obama was atheist or Christian or Muslim and they were making fun of black staffer's name. Do you think the media would care about the excuse of "Oh it doesn't matter what's in the emails because no one would know about them if the evil Russian hadn't hacked us?" No one would care about the excuse (which of course isn't proven and could just be made up).
Why does it matter who hacked the DNC emails? The DNC isn't a govt entitty. It's a private organization. I could care less if the Russians hacked it or if it was 13-year old acne filled boy. Well I take that back, the Russians could use it for blackmail. But then again, so could a 13-year old.
Ever heard of sarcasm? Trump is making fun of excuse and then the media at the same time.
rojo, for Pre's sake these are not the DNC emails we're talking about.
these are emails sent by the Secretary of State of the USA
ya maybe see the difference there? Encouraging spying on the sitting Secretary of State??????
(and by the way, re Benghazi and what she may have said to the victim's families:
1) NYT reporters on the scene at Benghazi interviwed attackers. The reporters asked what was their motivation. You know what the attackers said? They said it was the video.
Here's the orginal NYT story, with the interview:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09...illed.html"Interviewed at the scene on Tuesday night, many attackers and those who backed them said they were determined to defend their faith from the video’s insults."
2) A ringleader of the attack has said unconditionally that the video was the cause of the attack:
"He also maintained that the violence in Benghazi that night grew out of a protest against a movie produced in the United States that lampooned Islam and the Prophet Muhammad, rather than being a planned action by militants."
http://www.newyorker.com/news/...u-khattalaSo Rojo - why do you think Hillary was lying?)
stryker drilling wrote:
rojo wrote:The liberal outrage over this is blowing my mind. Are you guys stupid?
1) Who cares if Russia hacks Hillary's private emails from years ago? She says she only deleted the personal ones. So if the 30,000 are found, they'll all be personal and nothing to worry about.
If they hacked all of her emails, and there is sensitive stuff on there, then it proves the GOP's point that she should'nt have been emailing via a private server in her basement.
2) He's making fun of the liberals for trying to make a legitimate story that should be all shameful for the DNC instead be about the Russians.
DNC staffers were aiding Hillary and questioning the religion of Bernie Sanders. The Dems want us instead to be upset wtih the Russians.
Seriously. For a minute, let's imagine the roles are reversed. Let's imagine GOP emails are uncovered and they were questioning whether Barack Obama was atheist or Christian or Muslim and they were making fun of black staffer's name. Do you think the media would care about the excuse of "Oh it doesn't matter what's in the emails because no one would know about them if the evil Russian hadn't hacked us?" No one would care about the excuse (which of course isn't proven and could just be made up).
Why does it matter who hacked the DNC emails? The DNC isn't a govt entitty. It's a private organization. I could care less if the Russians hacked it or if it was 13-year old acne filled boy. Well I take that back, the Russians could use it for blackmail. But then again, so could a 13-year old.
Ever heard of sarcasm? Trump is making fun of excuse and then the media at the same time.
Hey dumb dumb, the liberals I know aren't upset at the possibility of the emails being found - they are pointing out the hypocrisy of saying that Hillary jeopardized national security with her private server and then turning around and asking her emails to be distributed to everyone in the world.
The very idea of asking a country like Russia to help to dig up dirt of a public servant for political gain is treasonous. I don't know any thoughtful, reasonable conservative who would disagree with that statement. Ronald Reagan would agree, no question.
NPSFlib wrote:
It was meant as a joke you Hillary loving morons.
forget it, they're in la la land
Rick Wilson â€@TheRickWilson 22m22 minutes ago
If Hillary Clinton was into some trolling, she'd come out and ask CHY-NA to hack Trump's tax returns.
agip wrote:
Rick Wilson â€@TheRickWilson 22m22 minutes ago
If Hillary Clinton was into some trolling, she'd come out and ask CHY-NA to hack Trump's tax returns.
Trump has first dibs on Chy-na. He asked them to help the Russia find the 30,000 emails. Do try to keep up.
agip wrote:
ya maybe see the difference there? Encouraging spying on the sitting Secretary of State??????
She's not the sitting Secretary of State, that would be John Kerry, and her emails are supposed to be public. Not spying.
NotSo wrote:
agip wrote:ya maybe see the difference there? Encouraging spying on the sitting Secretary of State??????
She's not the sitting Secretary of State, that would be John Kerry, and her emails are supposed to be public. Not spying.
she wrote the emails when she was sitting sec state
agip wrote:
NotSo wrote:She's not the sitting Secretary of State, that would be John Kerry, and her emails are supposed to be public. Not spying.
she wrote the emails when she was sitting sec state
the troll you replied to also fails to understand that many of those emails are not public. Classified documents are not in the public domain, same way Trump is treating his tax returns.
Bush and his 20 million emails wrote:
Debbie Devronica wrote:What do presidential candidates who destroyed 30,000 emails - which belong to you and me and the US - do? Should they be given ANY clearance to top secret information? Or should they be spending their time in a gulag???
Bush had more than 20 MILLION emails on secret servers controlled by the Republican National Committee destroyed. ONE THOUSAND TIMES MORE.
Right on bro! What about all the emails Abe Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt deleted! Those mofos!
Back to reality... what's relevant now is what the evil witch Hillary did and whether or not you morons think it was wrong or not, it definitely was wrong and jeopardized US interests regardless of what her corrupt cronies decided.
0/10
not a liberal wrote:
Back to reality... what's relevant now is what the evil witch Hillary did and whether or not you morons think it was wrong or not, it definitely was wrong and jeopardized US interests regardless of what her corrupt cronies decided.
So you're in agreement that Trump's Russian request jeopardizes US interests?