I wonder who is responsible for the latest attack in Nice?

That sounds like a GREAT idea!

No chance that any more Muslims would become radicalized as a result. And even if they did, so what? Even if the result of this most excellent plan is that 10 times more Westerners get blown up by Jihadists who cares? We'd be so damned right and they'd be so damned wrong with this most excellent plan that such body counts wouldn't really matter to real men like the Disco Kid and me.

Who's with me?

Oh Barry wrote:

Just wondering if there have been more Islamic terrorist attacks during the Obama Administration than under GW Bush?

You probably need to qualify this somehow. There have been far fewer attacks, for example, on American diplomatic facilities under Obama than under Bush.

Far, far, far fewer American victims of FOREIGN jihadis under Obama than Bush (9/11 alone was nearly 3,000).

More victims of homegrown radicalized Islamists under Obama than Bush.

There have been more large-scale attacks in Europe than I remember happening in the past, but I'm not sure that says much about Obama...probably says more about the millions of Muslim immigrants IN Europe, which is their policy, not ours.

A mixed bag.

Remember, Americans have been targeted by Islamic terrorists since the 1970s. Hundreds of Americans were killed during the Reagan years, for example, despite all the tough talk.

There is No wrote:

No chance that any more Muslims would become radicalized as a result.

Why would they? Islam is the religion of peace. He makes fun of Republicans all the time and they don't go around terrorizing, so I certainly don't think the religion of peace would either, right?

Oh okay - you will be timid and just stand by like a pansy and allow these terrorists to continue to blow up women and children with bombs that have nails and shrapnel in them to cause most severe maiming. Hey pansy - get out of the effing way!

Obama will call this workplace violence and will talk about how this affects him.

IT Guy wrote:

Oh Barry wrote:

Just wondering if there have been more Islamic terrorist attacks during the Obama Administration than under GW Bush?

You probably need to qualify this somehow. There have been far fewer attacks, for example, on American diplomatic facilities under Obama than under Bush.

Far, far, far fewer American victims of FOREIGN jihadis under Obama than Bush (9/11 alone was nearly 3,000).

More victims of homegrown radicalized Islamists under Obama than Bush.

There have been more large-scale attacks in Europe than I remember happening in the past, but I'm not sure that says much about Obama...probably says more about the millions of Muslim immigrants IN Europe, which is their policy, not ours.

A mixed bag.

Remember, Americans have been targeted by Islamic terrorists since the 1970s. Hundreds of Americans were killed during the Reagan years, for example, despite all the tough talk.

Maybe we should start limiting Muslim immigration into the US?

IT Guy wrote:

Oh Barry wrote:

Just wondering if there have been more Islamic terrorist attacks during the Obama Administration than under GW Bush?

You probably need to qualify this somehow. There have been far fewer attacks, for example, on American diplomatic facilities under Obama than under Bush.

Far, far, far fewer American victims of FOREIGN jihadis under Obama than Bush (9/11 alone was nearly 3,000).

More victims of homegrown radicalized Islamists under Obama than Bush.

There have been more large-scale attacks in Europe than I remember happening in the past, but I'm not sure that says much about Obama...probably says more about the millions of Muslim immigrants IN Europe, which is their policy, not ours.

A mixed bag.

Remember, Americans have been targeted by Islamic terrorists since the 1970s. Hundreds of Americans were killed during the Reagan years, for example, despite all the tough talk.

Americans have been targeted by Islamic terrorism since our founding days with the Barbary pirates. These people have NEVER been peaceful. Jefferson put a stop to it by ending ransom payments and sending the navy to defeat them.

Do Muslims worry about radicalizing us when they kill us by the dozen? No. why not?

Islam says it has retaliated for French support of the US occupations and US puppet regimes in Islamic lands.

From Cankle's Twitter:

"Let’s be clear: Islam is not our adversary. Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people and have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism."

Pander alert.

Watching french TV.

Police found ID of the driver.

31 yo.

French/tunisian guy..

I see Muslims are being Muslims once again today in France. Hillary and the Democratic Party wants to bring that shit here. 75+ very dead mangled bodies in the street all in the name of Allah.

sallly V wrote:

Obama is the most pathetic "president" ever. He knows that these terrorist attacks are done in the name of Islam. He is putting his radical ideology above the safety of American citizens. He cares only about the Democratic party. Just despicable what this "man" has done to this country. Treasonous is not even a strong enough statement.

What the hell? What color is the sky in your world? To say Obama is radical and treasonous is ignorant beyond words. You might disagree with his politics and his statements, but spewing vitriolic hate does nothing to further real discussion of the actual facts of the last 7 years of relative peace and stable (but not great) economy. And if you think Trump is going to wave a magic economy wand, you are sadly mistaken. There's never been a man more in it for himself than Trump.

Let me add that it is also time for mainstream Muslims to step up and shout these murderers down. Your silence paints you with the radical brush.

can't possibly happen wrote:

There is No wrote:

No chance that any more Muslims would become radicalized as a result.

Why would they? Islam is the religion of peace. He makes fun of Republicans all the time and they don't go around terrorizing, so I certainly don't think the religion of peace would either, right?

So you are agreeing then that there is no chance that this most excellent plan would backfire, right? And if it ended up with 10 times more people getting blown up you're definitely OK with that, right?

OK, we've got 3 (with me and the Disco Kid)! Damned the results - as long as I can call myself a macho man!

Who else is with us?

Sallly V wrote:

There is No wrote:

That sounds like a GREAT idea!

No chance that any more Muslims would become radicalized as a result. And even if they did, so what? Even if the result of this most excellent plan is that 10 times more Westerners get blown up by Jihadists who cares? We'd be so damned right and they'd be so damned wrong with this most excellent plan that such body counts wouldn't really matter to real men like the Disco Kid and me.

Who's with me?

Oh okay - you will be timid and just stand by like a pansy and allow these terrorists to continue to blow up women and children with bombs that have nails and shrapnel in them to cause most severe maiming. Hey pansy - get out of the effing way!

Make that 4 macho men! Who else is with us Real Men? Damned the collateral damage - full speed ahead!

pandaQC wrote:

Watching french TV.

Police found ID of the driver.

31 yo.

French/tunisian guy..

It isn't his fault. Blaim trucks and everyone who owns them. Ban Trucks!

don't jump to conclusions wrote:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/14/truck-crashes-into-crowd-at-bastille-day-celebrations-in-nice2/

Was it a reaction to a video someone made that no one has ever seen?

Every legal Truck Owner is responsible for the massacre in Nice, France.

Dude I like it.

I was going to propose the French Army declare martial law, post soldiers everywhere, and drag the families of the terrorists into the streets to be forcefully deported... onto a trash barge... towed into the sea by a warship... toward Saudi Arabia. These "people" do not exist in a vacuum.

Cleave the fvcking cancer.

France should not support US imperialism.