People used to talk smack about Stanford's dynasty-in-the-making, too. Notice they don't say much about it anymore.
People used to talk smack about Stanford's dynasty-in-the-making, too. Notice they don't say much about it anymore.
CU will win the men's race next year going away.
please explain ****ss.... I can think of no insulting word that fills those *'s and s's.
jama wrote:
Nope and *****ss I would love to take those bets. Sure taking 2nd may get old, but I know of a few hundred Div I teams that would love to get one 2nd place finish in their history!!! Have you noticed CU's off years??? Just watch and make sure that you let me know in the next few years what you think of the 4,5, and 6th place finishes compared to Wisco's 1st and 2nd's!!!!!!!!!!!
This is the dumbest posts ever. How did talking about Bumbalough's college choices turn into a Wetmore Love hate post off. This seems to happen anytime CU or Wetmore get mentioned. Good on them for their great success, and too bad for all the injuries, but is this really what the post is all about. I am very interested to see where Bumbalough goes, and was pretty keen to read this thread, but you guys have turned it into a shit thread, because of all of your bullshit.
his post is perhaps the dumbest post ever here - and that's saying something...
if you're gonna bash cu be a little more creative than bashing 3 guys - OH WAIT - I mean the ONLY 3 American guys to win an NCAA cross title since kennedy...coincidence? f*** no.
and you would never want to make world champ and olympic finals in years where you're the ONLY Americans to do so as Goucher and Torres did, and make an Olympic team as a collegian, as ritz did - oh shoot and he was the fastest american collegian EVER at 10k damn you're right that would suck royal.
oh and yeah, he also wouldn't want to follow in their footsteps and sign - outside of Webb - the 3 largest contracts in US distance running. no, that would be terrible. why would you ever want to go to CU??????