Muslims hack American blogger to death

agip wrote:

...I mean conservatives were all for breaking the constitution in terror of an illusionary communist conspiracy. Like you are in terror of a bunch of liberals.

agip - those weren't conservatives, at least when they made those decisions - don't automatically confuse someone with an "R" after their name with someone that has conservative principles (particularly fiscal and state-governance conservatives).

And I actually don't mind paying taxes - we live in a complex society that requires a level of central governance, no doubt. Any one that wants to "get rid of government" is either crazy or trolling. My argument is where the line is drawn and I think the state can and should get by on less taxes and focus on real issues not fancifulness, Candy Land policies.

And most of the liberals I talk to have ridiculously biased/racist/emotional/ignorant beliefs underlying the majority of their policies. My goal is to unearth them.

Sash wrote:

Muslims ....rape women at an alarming rate.

Hey, sounds like they'd fit right at the average fraternity in the US. Especially if they were on the football or lacrosse team!

Sash wrote:They are filled with hate.

Then the Republican Party should welcome them with open arms. "Filled with Hate" is the key personality trait of people in the conservative party.

Sash wrote:They kill people who do not agree with them.

.

Again, they'd fit in perfect in the USA. 1000's of people die here every year because of an argument or disagreement.

If the above is what will happen when "the muslims take over", no one will even notice because it will be jus more of the same ol', same ol', in the good ol' USA.

Hi Kermit wrote:

Ki11ing Terrorist wrote:

2,200 TERRORIST killed in 1 day?

Why wouldn't they cheer!!!

That is a lot of suicidal bombers disposed of at one time.

Hi Frogman/Jeffrey Boomhauer/MAURICE/biggest scumbag to ever post on this board.

How's your empty, phony, sad, lonely life treating you? one shot could end all your pain bro'. You know you want out. Do the right thing....for yourself, for everyone. Put one of those guns to good use. They can be used for good, right?

I love that I make you so angry and emotionally disturbed...you fckn freak!

Haaaaaa haaaa haaaa

agip wrote:

I'm not clear on why you are comparing events of 160 years ago in the US to events happening today in muslim countries.

Please explain why these actions are equivalent and should shame us into silence. Seems to me that if an act was done 160 years ago, the current living people don't carry any blame and should therefore be free to criticize barbaric behavior by brown people in the third world. But maybe I am wrong, so please, explain your view.

I did explain it my more recent post, but I'll re-iterate at your request because I don't want my intentions misinterpreted. KK is holding his head high because he feels superior to others who are born into different circumstances and as a result hold different beliefs. That line of thinking does a great disservice to humanity as a whole.

We shouldn't be shamed into silence, or silent at all. The atrocities being committed by ISIS, Boko Haram and other extreme groups should be foremost in our conversations and we need to find quick and effective solutions to stopping them.

This xenophobic, anti-Muslim rhetoric is only making things worse.

I'm just trying to prevent these inane generalizations that he's making towards one group based on the actions of a few from that group while pointing to the average behavior of his group and glossing over the fact that his culture isn't perfect either.

Muslims and their apologists have forfeit their status as human beings as far as I'm concerned.

krispy kremlin wrote:

And I actually don't mind paying taxes - we live in a complex society that requires a level of central governance, no doubt. Any one that wants to "get rid of government" is either crazy or trolling.

Well, that's more or less what many tea partiers say. So, there you go.

krispy kremlin wrote:And most of the liberals I talk to have ridiculously biased/racist/emotional/ignorant beliefs underlying the majority of their policies. My goal is to unearth them.

lol. Pretty sure you described conservatives to a tee (especially the biased/racist/emotional/ignorant part. Wait, that was the whole thing!)

Nuke Palestine wrote:

Muslims and their apologists have forfeit their status as human beings as far as I'm concerned.

Really. Keep it down. I don't want to read about any LR posters having an unfortunate run-in with some ca-ra-zy terrorists.

Then the masses would come take a lurk to LR to see what it's all about.

Christians crashed commercial planes into the Twin Towers in the name of Religion? Killing 3000 People...

A jihadist POS Army Officer killed American Soldiers in Ft Hood in the name of religion...

A Christian cut the head off of a female co-worker recently in the name of religion...

Yeah, Muslims don't commit terrorist acts in America...or as you say "almost never."

You are beyond fckn stupid dude!

krispy kremlin wrote:

yes, and I want to de-bunk the idiot bleeding-heart liberal who brought up Native Americans (which oddly enough I've been hearing more and more about from my stable of brainless northeastern liberal sheep - which by the way is an attempt to mitigate the Elizabeth Warren "I am a Native American" lie by once again distracting the american public from the truth). Native Americans were slaughter by European disease and European technology. Game over. We've since granted them land that they can spend their lives drunk on or build casinos on. Deal with it.

In summary: early anglo-saxon culture dominated native american culture - and the wheels of history roll on.

Well said. People should know when they're conquered.

Yet you will never leave!

Ha ha ha.

You turd.

Well duh wrote:

I'm just trying to prevent these inane generalizations that he's making towards one group based on the actions of a few from that group while pointing to the average behavior of his group and glossing over the fact that his culture isn't perfect either.

Don't bother. This is what people like him do, exactly what you described above. They do it to blacks (too) all the time on here (and everywhere else)- focus on black crime, wait, change that, OBSESS about black crime, and then paint the entire black race as "criminals", "animals", etc, while completely ignoring the horrendous crimes committed by whites every day in our country.

Hey, here's an idea: if you want to draw a black and white picture of who is pure good and who is pure evil, which what they seem to like to do (white americans on one side, blacks and muslims on the other) based on which groups commit more horrific violent acts, then let's do it by gender instead. What do we have now? If these clowns like KK were consistent they'd say:

'MALES ARE EVIL! We need to stop males from being so violent and committing such horrific acts. Don't even try to compare the few crimes by women to what MALES do, it's simply not comparable. MEN have a violence problem. MEN have a crime problem. MEN ARE A SCOURGE ON SOCIETY."

But do they say this? no of course not. But they don't mind making such blanket statements about blacks in this country, or muslims elsewhere. Hypocrites.

Wow you are really stupid dude wrote:

Christians crashed commercial planes into the Twin Towers in the name of Religion? Killing 3000 People...

A jihadist POS Army Officer killed American Soldiers in Ft Hood in the name of religion...

A Christian cut the head off of a female co-worker recently in the name of religion...

Yeah, Muslims don't commit terrorist acts in America...or as you say "almost never."

You are beyond fckn stupid dude!

ok, of course it has happened.

But how many 1000s upon 1000s of times has it happened where a "good christian" person (I am sure they were viewed that way by some, or it was the image they created, i.e., they went to church) murdered people in this country?? Oh wait, I already answered it for you.

The odds of you getting killed in this country by a muslim terrorist are 1,000,000,000 x less than your odds of getting killed by american "christian" (maybe not a devout follower, but goes to church sometimes and describes himself that way) Bank on it.

Kk, if mccarthyites were not conservatives, then Isis members are not Muslim.

Seriously - the mccarthyites sure thought they were conservatives, just like Isis guys think they are Muslim what's the difference? And why are you able to magically shed the mccarthyites from conservatism and Muslims are not allowed to shed the jihadis from Islam?

Well duh wrote:

agip wrote:

let's stick to current events, shall we?

Why? My aim isn't to deny that people affiliated with Islam are currently the head-and-shoulders leaders in extreme violence. I just want to point out that no group of people based on religion, creed, ethnicity, location, or any of these tangibles, is better than anyone else. It's easy to sit and poo-poo other parts of the world where people don't have the opportunities that are essentially exclusive in America and some parts of Europe, opportunities that came at no small cost.

Xenophobia needs to be squashed, and any culture that uses terms such as "bleeding-heart" as a derogatory term for people who have compassion, or the ability to step back and compare their situation to others without bias, certainly can't be considered very good.

Right now, right here, it seems very obvious to me that Europe and the English speaking foreign colonies are indeed exactly better than other societies. At other times that was not true. But your moral equivalencing the west and Islamic countries is nonsensical.

In other words, it is meaningless to do what you are doing- trying to fling the turd of hypocrisy on the west. Let's just look at the now.

As you know, crime in this country is not committed in the name of Christianity, while untold hundreds of thousands are killed in the name of Islam.

Your logic is impeachable.

First, I'll say I appreciate the gender analogy. It's an even more consistent line than grouping by religion or ethnicity because it's not geographically determined.

I must also point out that there is substantial statistical evidence that blacks in America are more likely to commit crime (by a percentage of total population). This we can't ignore. That said, it has nothing to do with the fact that they are black; it has everything to do with the situations they are born into, and how they respond to it. People from lower socio-economic statuses are more likely to commit crime, or at least have higher incarceration rates. But it is no one's fault if they are born into poor situations. It is the fault of past white Americans that blacks are on average more disadvantaged than whites. And the current people in power are not doing nearly enough to remedy the situation; the widening of the gap between the rich and poor is worsening it. I will add to that that clearly socio-economic status is not the only determining factor in one's criminal inclinations.

You can't look at one factor, be it race, religion, social class, location, whatever, and say pointedly that you know how that person will turn out or what their behavior will be. Humans are more complex than that. But it's convenient for people like KK to do that because then he can continue to perpetuate the beliefs and actions that have afforded him so much more than most people in the world, past and present.

How about citing a single incident.

Better yet give us an incident where an NRA ("gun culture") Christian went on a killing spree in the name of Christianity.

Just 1!

You are a liberal blowhard terrorist apologist nothing more, nothing less.

We will be waiting for your findings.....

I honestly tired reading this a couple times and while your grasp on the english language does exist to a certain degree, I believe it is your ability to thoroughly develop and express a coherent, cogent argument that is absent.

On a side note, I vividly remember the last time I listened to "right wing talk radio". It was over a decade ago when I was interning at a major accounting firm. They put me in a cube next to the mail room where some old dude would listen to it all day. I remember thinking how fanatical and convincing it all was. For the past ten years I've consistently listened to NPR while commuting to work - I only change the channel to music stations when the conversation becomes racists or saturated with ridiculous cultural irrelevance (about 3 or 4 times a week).

Agip wrote:

Right now, right here, it seems very obvious to me that Europe and the English speaking foreign colonies are indeed exactly better than other societies. At other times that was not true. But your moral equivalencing the west and Islamic countries is nonsensical.

In other words, it is meaningless to do what you are doing- trying to fling the turd of hypocrisy on the west. Let's just look at the now.

I will grant you that my method of trying to bring my point to fruition was convoluted.

That said, I feel you're still missing what I'm trying to get at. KK thinks that he is better than Muslims, has more of a right to live here than they do, etc. My point is that he is not, and does not. My point is that people will do what they will do to get what they want, and because he already has most of what he wants, he can sit on the internet and participate in a fear-based wave of anti-Islam rhetoric. If he had been born 200 years ago he would probably be pro-slavery and all that mess.

I'm, again, not trying to refute that now extreme fundamentalist Muslims are the predominate source of terrorist activity globally. That doesn't make Muslims worse people than anyone else.