A few thoughts here.When I was at Cornell, kids often wanted to leave the home meets early as they take forever. My boss wanted them there the entire meet so they could support their teammates. I see both sides to it. I think we were successful in track as we had a great culture but Ivy League kids often don't have 10 hours to blow every weekend. Yes a soccer team player would never leave mid game but a soccer player isn't in season all year long and doesn't have games that last 10 hours either. But with us it was clear, you didn't leave without talking to the head coach.To me, the key thing is what is the team rule? And what transpired with the assistant coach? Did she ask the assistant for permission? Or when she told the assistant did the assistant not tell her it wasn't allowed? If she either got permission or wasn't told it was against the rules, I don't think she should be dismissed. But if she knew it was an important rule and brazenly told the assistant, "I'm leaving" then I can sort of get it.Moving on.
nick83 wrote:
Update: the coach said he was going to call her and talk to her and her parents about it two days ago. She has tried to call him 4 times, and apparently, according to an assistant coach (same one she told that she was leaving) that he's on vacation for a week. Unbelievable. This guy needs to be fired. What coach vacations in the middle of the season?
The more I read the more I think the coach is seeing this kid as a problem maker. You, a supporter of hers, clearly have an attitude. Your mad that the kid was kicked off the team for leaving a team competition in the 'middle of the contest.' Again, a soccer player would never do this. We can debate whether the coach is overrreacing, but it's clearly a coaches right to do it or not.
Yet you want the coach fired for going on vacation in the 'middle of the season.' I'd say that right now the kids are in exams and the coach went on vacation 'during exams or the christmas holidays' not 'in the middle of the season.' The only person abandoning their duty was the athlete in question who rather than support her teammates went home so her parents could save on some gas money.
It sounds like you think the athletes and coaches are on an even playing field. They aren't. The coach is in charge.
You want the coach to let the kid leave early so the parents can save on an 'hour of gas?' Really? What is that worth $6?