Really, Bro? wrote: There's a lot of hype on Lalang because he's destroying everyone, and apparently just on 50 or so miles a week. I mean we've seen runners just as good and maybe better than him, but not many. But, there's definitely reason to be talking about him I mean the guy broke 4 minutes in the mile the first time he ever ran on a track.
The flack that Lalang is rightfully getting has nothing to do with his achievements, which are laudable. It has everything to do with establishing an AMERICAN college running scene that provides a forum for AMERICAN college runners to compete head-to-head, not interlopers from other countries, imported by unethical coaches who want to gain an unfair advantage for their teams.
Let Lalang run in Kenya, his mother country. He will be able to compete against the best runners from other countries, including Americans, in international competition.
As a separate matter, the NCAA MUST establish upper limits on the age at which you can compete in NCAA competition. Period. To have 25 year olds competing against teenagers is laughable and undermines the concept of fair play.
Right now, the competitive landscape in American college running is slanted in too many ways to the detriment of the sport, as well as to the consternation of the majority of runners who want to race on a level playing field.
Am I wrong?