Why not 2 millons? Under 2 hours is out of this era.
Maybe in 30 years, when a Kenyan or Ethiopian run 56.xx or 57 flat in HM...
Why not 2 millons? Under 2 hours is out of this era.
Maybe in 30 years, when a Kenyan or Ethiopian run 56.xx or 57 flat in HM...
someone had to do it wrote wrote:
The wind and net drop in boston negated the difficult hills. The times are legit and have always been legit, and today just proves that.
Ice wrote:
You have a very loose definition of "prove". If Ocsar Pistorius runs 42.06 seconds for the 400, and then LaShawn Merritt comes out and runs 42.31, does that "prove" that Pistorius's blades don't provide an advantage? Because that's basically your logic.
^^THIS^^