that website is so pretty, it didnt make me want to pour booze all over my eyes at all!
that website is so pretty, it didnt make me want to pour booze all over my eyes at all!
Drake is shit!!
Bryant Univ is pretty pathetic. Their coach is a classic example of someone who could run but can't reach athletes.
Results aren't as good as a half way decent high school team.
This is the third time you have posted about Bryant University. You pick any thread to try and bring down the coach and the program. From the look of things, the program is doing quite well, adjusting to Division I with little scholarship money. This thread is on fully funded programs. stop posting pk...
I actually noticed that too. this guys is a real c*ck smoke. He must be one of those, I quit the team, but still run and hang around the guys on the team, fellows. those guys are the worst. ever. they think they understand running better than the coach so they quit. and won't leave everyone still on the team alone. good riddance sir
The guys are fine, it's the girls who are hurting. I know that a few years ago a bunch quit.
Northern Colorado University
San Jose State. Coach is some old guy who makes the team run 15 miles per day. For intervals, he makes the team do only 800,1000, and mile repeats on the grass.. But then SJSU doesnt have a track..
How about we call out the least funded teams for doing to WELL and making the well funded teams look bad? Richmond anybody?
This article might as well have been written by Charlie Sheen....it is just a bunch of crap spewing out of his keyboard. I see almost no statistical reasoning or common denominator that this list is based on other than his desire to slam some schools.
Seriously, there is no way that UK, Purdue, & Colorado are in the bottom five of ALL fully funded teams in the nation. I could probably come up with 5 schools in 5 minutes in Ohio, Indiana, and Tennessee that would get absolutely crushed in a dual meet with any of these 3 school.
First of all, why do people keep posting about programs that are not fully funded throughout this thread. It was made pretty clear that this thread and that article were about FULLY funded programs.
Second of all, do people realize how few men's track teams are fully funded? There are not many. I have no idea if these five schools are really the worst, but most men's track programs are not fully funded and the five mentioned are and have done poorly in their conference meets.