la la land wrote:
Many tracks, however, are not regular geometrical shapes.
That is, the turns aren't designed from a fixed center.
Source?
la la land wrote:
Many tracks, however, are not regular geometrical shapes.
That is, the turns aren't designed from a fixed center.
Source?
really, never knew wrote:
la la land wrote:Many tracks, however, are not regular geometrical shapes.
That is, the turns aren't designed from a fixed center.
Source?
They're around (sort of).
Here's one:
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&ie=UTF8&om=1&z=18&ll=34.240943,-118.590358&spn=0.00212,0.003245&t=hBlowing.Rock Master wrote:
figure8 wrote:Interesting - so was this track 400m along the inside edge of lane 1, rather than the 30cm-out line? The difference is about 2m.
Don't know. But if she measured it along the inside edge and it was 2m long, and measuring properly 30cm out adds 2m, wouldn't that make it 4m too long?
Yes.
that is not a track
D shaped track
The Stanford track, FWIW
devo wrote:
The Stanford track, FWIW
http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=3911889
It's actually worth nothing.