Do? The million dollar question. I don't know that there's anything that you, me, and everyone who reads this site could do. Never mind that there'd not be enough of a consensus on exactly what to do let alone the motivation to follow through. The BroJos possess great power as opinion-makers with a large audience, but they're clearly not activists and probably never will be. I don't mean to enable apathy, but I don't see significant openings in areas that matter to make a meaningful difference. I think some very macro changes need to be made. I know people were hopeful that the USOC would decertify and reform USATF, but the USOC doesn't have enough integrity itself to give much hope that such an outcome would result in a real improvement over what we've got. USATF needs to do a lot of things, there is just too much conflict of interest (Masback to Nike is a prime and obvious example, there are surely many others that don't see the light of day) to expect any of it to ever happen. USATF has an interest in protecting high-profile athletes, whether it means placating agents or covering up doping positives or whatever else. Sponsors are not wanting to put anything into distance running or road races like they are with sprints, so why would USATF want to bother much with road racing and distance running? My answer is that the sport (distance running road racing) probably wouldn't do any worse by divorcing itself from USATF and either aligning with a more supportive governing body (RRCA or AIMS or whatever) or create its own supportive network umbrella. My other thought is that USATF should foster only the highest levels of competition (international seniors and juniors and national championships for each) in track and field and farm out things like youth track, masters running, mountain running, road running, cross country, etc. to other organizations such as AAU and RRCA. A tighter, leaner focus for USATF might help what they both retain and jettison. Just some rambling thoughts....