Does anyone else find Paula Radcliffe quite sexy?

When you think 2:15 and female it conjures up images of Martina Navratilova type "women". Paula isn't a "10"

but she's definitely cute, especially in a time when most top female athletes are more manly than the men. BTW

the bubble shot was great. Hard to look at that pic and say "yeah....2:15".

Most female athletes aren´t looking that masculine or that "not hot" when they are off the track. And a lot of those are looking very good when they are made up.

I don´t like Paula Radcliff. But I have lots of respect for her accomplishments. I don´t think she´s ugly, but she ain´t pretty either. She´s got nothing that would make anybody I know say "damn, she´s special". And she surely ain´t hot?

To me she looks like the track version of Celine Dion.

Paula isn't a stunner, but she is certainly 'pretty'. And in light of the current hot news story and the fact that some people think Paula is on drugs it's interesting to note that she simply doesn't look as if she on something. Other than being very skinny she looks totally natural. She is also intelligent, articulate has a warm generous personality and is damn fast. A great combination.

It's all about that quirky smile and the glint in her eye. Perhaps it's just something about athletic English chicks that can run 2:15. Maybe it's the thought she can go for several hours. Then again, she does have nice legs. I see lots of good things.

[quote]Bazza wrote:

Paula isn't a stunner, but she is certainly 'pretty'. And in light of the current hot news story and the fact that some people think Paula is on drugs it's interesting to note that she simply doesn't look as if she on something. quote]

How is it that one would look if they were on EPO?

kind of like Uma Thurman after getting hit by a semi