Geez, Jaguar1, no one can disagree with you on a subject you have yet to be credentialed in (you're still in school, right? are you an RD yet? I didn't think you were) without you coming back with a flurry of information that may or may not have anything to do with subject at hand. Just because you post a ton of links and abstracts, it doesn't mean your initial points were valid. No, I say they were still absolutely shots in the dark.
1) You have absolutely no proof that Ritz was "severaly calorie restricted" in college which is what several of the studies you looked at were measuring the effects of. None. Sure people can always improve their diets, but someone can still get a stress fracture while still eating a very well-rounded diet. Part of it is certainly genetic, some people's bodies can handle more punishment than others. Look at many of the Africans. I am sure we could point to plenty of African runners that grew up with a less than ideal diet on paper (less than recommened calories, or less than the reccommened amount of certain nutrients) and who still did not get stresss fractures. An offhand comment by Ritz or Goucher does demonstrate what he Ritz was eating in college.
2) Besides "calorie restriction", there are countless other reasons Ritz might have had stress fractures, such as not enough calcium, or vitamin D, or vitamin K (which all play roles in bone health/strength). Or his diet could have been fine, and the fact that he was growing while training so much could have been related to his injuries. Maybe altitude and not enough soft surface running could have been a factor, maybe if he strength trained more, he could have avoided some injuries. Again, just because you post a bunch studies showing that either anorexia or lots of running can reduce one's testosterone, it doesnt = "ritz's stress fractures were due to not enough calories." Most of your studies (if any) did NOT even discuss a relationship between calorie restriction in male runners and stress fractures. You've made a big leap in the dark in figuring out what Ritz's injury issues were related to in college, pretty much based on nothing.
3) Whatever Ritz has been eating or doing for training the last 2+ years, he should continue doing it, because he has been quite healthy during that time, training very consistenlty and extensively. He had a minor "stress reaction" which he only took a litle time off for, and then came back better than ever with his 10k road win over Mottram and then his 8:11 2-mile. He's been very healthy lately, so it seems a waste of time to be debating "how can Ritz remain healthy", when he's BEEN HEALTHY! And you mentioned Ritz's rivals....wasn't Teg injured a lot in college? It hasn't hurt his overall developlment, since he has run brilliantly lately. runners get hurt sometimes.
Lastly, you wrote...
" In the book "The Marathon: Physiological, Medical, Epidemiological, and Psychological Studies", one thing they point out that separates the elites from everyone else is their inner awareness of themself and how they feel. Highly introverted."
That's the ONE THING that separate elites from everybody else? I don't believe it. Physical talent is the "one thing" that separates them. Ritz seems plenty "introverted" to me. I don't think that is his issue either, though I have no idea why you brought that into the discussion (and look at Haile Geb, he's every extroverted in ways. Just because you read something in a book, it doesn't make it true. I ain't buying their theory one bit).